The Comparison Of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (Propofol, Alfentanyl Plus Midazolam, Alfentanyl) With General Anesthesia In D&C Patients

Background: Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) compared to general anesthesia has some pits and falls. Many drugs have been employed for this anesthesia. Propofol is accounted as the last advent anesthetic drug. It belongs to alkyl phenol families and has been accounted one of the best choices for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shoeibi G, Akbari Nejad M, Hosein Gholizadeh A
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2004-07-01
Series:Tehran University Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/990.pdf&manuscript_id=990
id doaj-2a79bafbf517444db1ada5d9be9f4b08
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a79bafbf517444db1ada5d9be9f4b082020-11-24T21:55:37ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesTehran University Medical Journal1683-17641735-73222004-07-01622115122The Comparison Of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (Propofol, Alfentanyl Plus Midazolam, Alfentanyl) With General Anesthesia In D&C PatientsShoeibi GAkbari Nejad MHosein Gholizadeh ABackground: Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) compared to general anesthesia has some pits and falls. Many drugs have been employed for this anesthesia. Propofol is accounted as the last advent anesthetic drug. It belongs to alkyl phenol families and has been accounted one of the best choices for the continuous infusion. Invention of midazolam as the first water soluble benzodiazepine was also an important event in anesthesia and it can be used as continuous infusion for the anesthesia. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, alfentanyl plus propofol or midazolam were used for TIVA anesthesia in 60 female patients undergoing Dilatation and Curettage (D&C) in Dr.Shariati hospital in March 2002 till March 2003. They were allocated reandomly in two group of alfentanyl plus propofol (propofol group) or alfentanyl plus midazolam (midazolam group) Results: There was no significant difference in mean of age between propofol group and midazolam group (P>0.05), also There was no significant difference in preanesthesia condition such as blood pressure and heart rate between propofol group and midazolam group (p>0.05). After induction of anesthesia there was a gross blood pressure decrease in both group that it was greater in midazolam group (85 mmHg versus 73 mmHg, P0.05) also there was just one naloxane injection in midazolam group that have no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). Recovery room stay was significantly lower in propofol group (25 minutes versus 39 minutes, P<0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study was similar to Vuyk et.al.In their study there was a significant lower recovery time estimated by psychomotor reflexes and there was significant lower drowsiness, place and time orientation time compared to midazolam group. Finally according to the results of this study it can be resulted that TIVA with propofol is more suitable than midazolam and it can lower hospitalization time and cost. In future studies using other narcotics and other narcotics-anesthetic compounds with various dose can be mentioned. http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/990.pdf&manuscript_id=990Total intravenous anesthesiaalfentanyl
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shoeibi G
Akbari Nejad M
Hosein Gholizadeh A
spellingShingle Shoeibi G
Akbari Nejad M
Hosein Gholizadeh A
The Comparison Of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (Propofol, Alfentanyl Plus Midazolam, Alfentanyl) With General Anesthesia In D&C Patients
Tehran University Medical Journal
Total intravenous anesthesia
alfentanyl
author_facet Shoeibi G
Akbari Nejad M
Hosein Gholizadeh A
author_sort Shoeibi G
title The Comparison Of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (Propofol, Alfentanyl Plus Midazolam, Alfentanyl) With General Anesthesia In D&C Patients
title_short The Comparison Of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (Propofol, Alfentanyl Plus Midazolam, Alfentanyl) With General Anesthesia In D&C Patients
title_full The Comparison Of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (Propofol, Alfentanyl Plus Midazolam, Alfentanyl) With General Anesthesia In D&C Patients
title_fullStr The Comparison Of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (Propofol, Alfentanyl Plus Midazolam, Alfentanyl) With General Anesthesia In D&C Patients
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison Of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (Propofol, Alfentanyl Plus Midazolam, Alfentanyl) With General Anesthesia In D&C Patients
title_sort comparison of total intravenous anesthesia (propofol, alfentanyl plus midazolam, alfentanyl) with general anesthesia in d&c patients
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Tehran University Medical Journal
issn 1683-1764
1735-7322
publishDate 2004-07-01
description Background: Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) compared to general anesthesia has some pits and falls. Many drugs have been employed for this anesthesia. Propofol is accounted as the last advent anesthetic drug. It belongs to alkyl phenol families and has been accounted one of the best choices for the continuous infusion. Invention of midazolam as the first water soluble benzodiazepine was also an important event in anesthesia and it can be used as continuous infusion for the anesthesia. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, alfentanyl plus propofol or midazolam were used for TIVA anesthesia in 60 female patients undergoing Dilatation and Curettage (D&C) in Dr.Shariati hospital in March 2002 till March 2003. They were allocated reandomly in two group of alfentanyl plus propofol (propofol group) or alfentanyl plus midazolam (midazolam group) Results: There was no significant difference in mean of age between propofol group and midazolam group (P>0.05), also There was no significant difference in preanesthesia condition such as blood pressure and heart rate between propofol group and midazolam group (p>0.05). After induction of anesthesia there was a gross blood pressure decrease in both group that it was greater in midazolam group (85 mmHg versus 73 mmHg, P0.05) also there was just one naloxane injection in midazolam group that have no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). Recovery room stay was significantly lower in propofol group (25 minutes versus 39 minutes, P<0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study was similar to Vuyk et.al.In their study there was a significant lower recovery time estimated by psychomotor reflexes and there was significant lower drowsiness, place and time orientation time compared to midazolam group. Finally according to the results of this study it can be resulted that TIVA with propofol is more suitable than midazolam and it can lower hospitalization time and cost. In future studies using other narcotics and other narcotics-anesthetic compounds with various dose can be mentioned.
topic Total intravenous anesthesia
alfentanyl
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/990.pdf&manuscript_id=990
work_keys_str_mv AT shoeibig thecomparisonoftotalintravenousanesthesiapropofolalfentanylplusmidazolamalfentanylwithgeneralanesthesiaindampcpatients
AT akbarinejadm thecomparisonoftotalintravenousanesthesiapropofolalfentanylplusmidazolamalfentanylwithgeneralanesthesiaindampcpatients
AT hoseingholizadeha thecomparisonoftotalintravenousanesthesiapropofolalfentanylplusmidazolamalfentanylwithgeneralanesthesiaindampcpatients
AT shoeibig comparisonoftotalintravenousanesthesiapropofolalfentanylplusmidazolamalfentanylwithgeneralanesthesiaindampcpatients
AT akbarinejadm comparisonoftotalintravenousanesthesiapropofolalfentanylplusmidazolamalfentanylwithgeneralanesthesiaindampcpatients
AT hoseingholizadeha comparisonoftotalintravenousanesthesiapropofolalfentanylplusmidazolamalfentanylwithgeneralanesthesiaindampcpatients
_version_ 1725861523017957376