A Pilot Evaluation of Mhealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities

Growing evidence demonstrates that people with disabilities face more challenges in accessing healthcare and wellness resources, compared to non-disabled populations. As mobile applications focused on health and wellness (mHealth apps) become prevalent, it is important that people with disabilities...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erin Radcliffe, Ben Lippincott, Raeda Anderson, Mike Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3669
id doaj-2a7a61cedde54094907aaaa7dad80f82
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a7a61cedde54094907aaaa7dad80f822021-04-01T23:04:20ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-04-01183669366910.3390/ijerph18073669A Pilot Evaluation of Mhealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with DisabilitiesErin Radcliffe0Ben Lippincott1Raeda Anderson2Mike Jones3Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, USAShepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, USAShepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, USAShepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, USAGrowing evidence demonstrates that people with disabilities face more challenges in accessing healthcare and wellness resources, compared to non-disabled populations. As mobile applications focused on health and wellness (mHealth apps) become prevalent, it is important that people with disabilities can access and use mHealth apps. At present, there is no source of unified information about the accessibility and usability of mHealth apps for people with disabilities. We set out to create such a source, establishing a systematic approach for evaluating app accessibility. Our goal was to develop a simple, replicable app evaluation process to generate useful information for people with disabilities (to aid suitable app selection) and app developers (to improve app accessibility and usability). We collected data using two existing assessment instruments to test three top-rated weight management apps with nine users representing three disability groups: vision, dexterity, and cognitive impairment. Participants with visual impairments reported the lowest accessibility ratings, most challenges, and least tolerance for issues. Participants with dexterity impairments experienced significant accessibility-related difficulties. Participants with cognitive impairments experienced mild difficulties and higher tolerances for issues. Our pilot protocol will be applied to test mHealth apps and populate a “curation” website to assist consumers in selecting mHealth apps.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3669mHealthmobile applicationsaccessibilityusabilityevaluation methodsuser needs discovery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erin Radcliffe
Ben Lippincott
Raeda Anderson
Mike Jones
spellingShingle Erin Radcliffe
Ben Lippincott
Raeda Anderson
Mike Jones
A Pilot Evaluation of Mhealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
mHealth
mobile applications
accessibility
usability
evaluation methods
user needs discovery
author_facet Erin Radcliffe
Ben Lippincott
Raeda Anderson
Mike Jones
author_sort Erin Radcliffe
title A Pilot Evaluation of Mhealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
title_short A Pilot Evaluation of Mhealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
title_full A Pilot Evaluation of Mhealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
title_fullStr A Pilot Evaluation of Mhealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Evaluation of Mhealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
title_sort pilot evaluation of mhealth app accessibility for three top-rated weight management apps by people with disabilities
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Growing evidence demonstrates that people with disabilities face more challenges in accessing healthcare and wellness resources, compared to non-disabled populations. As mobile applications focused on health and wellness (mHealth apps) become prevalent, it is important that people with disabilities can access and use mHealth apps. At present, there is no source of unified information about the accessibility and usability of mHealth apps for people with disabilities. We set out to create such a source, establishing a systematic approach for evaluating app accessibility. Our goal was to develop a simple, replicable app evaluation process to generate useful information for people with disabilities (to aid suitable app selection) and app developers (to improve app accessibility and usability). We collected data using two existing assessment instruments to test three top-rated weight management apps with nine users representing three disability groups: vision, dexterity, and cognitive impairment. Participants with visual impairments reported the lowest accessibility ratings, most challenges, and least tolerance for issues. Participants with dexterity impairments experienced significant accessibility-related difficulties. Participants with cognitive impairments experienced mild difficulties and higher tolerances for issues. Our pilot protocol will be applied to test mHealth apps and populate a “curation” website to assist consumers in selecting mHealth apps.
topic mHealth
mobile applications
accessibility
usability
evaluation methods
user needs discovery
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3669
work_keys_str_mv AT erinradcliffe apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT benlippincott apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT raedaanderson apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT mikejones apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT erinradcliffe pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT benlippincott pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT raedaanderson pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT mikejones pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
_version_ 1724175641813712896