Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: Lower is Not Always Better

<p><strong>Background:</strong>&nbsp; It has been observed that low-frequency stimulation (LFS) may be effective for dystonia, and the use of LFS may alleviate the need for frequent battery changes in a subset of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze LFS as a strate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frances M. Velez-Lago, Genko Oyama, Kelly D. Foote, Nelson Hwynn, Pamela Zeilman, Charles Jacobson, Samuel Wu, Michael S. Okun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2012-02-01
Series:Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements
Online Access:https://tremorjournal.org/index.php/tremor/article/view/55
id doaj-2a824bae3c2442dc816819436ef106ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a824bae3c2442dc816819436ef106ee2021-03-02T05:17:51ZengUbiquity PressTremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements2160-82882012-02-01210.7916/D85X27PH11Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: Lower is Not Always BetterFrances M. Velez-LagoGenko OyamaKelly D. FooteNelson HwynnPamela ZeilmanCharles JacobsonSamuel WuMichael S. Okun<p><strong>Background:</strong>&nbsp; It has been observed that low-frequency stimulation (LFS) may be effective for dystonia, and the use of LFS may alleviate the need for frequent battery changes in a subset of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze LFS as a strategy to treat deep brain stimulation (DBS) patients with various dystonias.</p> <p><strong>Methods:&nbsp;</strong>Subjects had to receive a minimum of 6 months of clinical follow-up at the University of Florida, and were required to have a minimum of 3 months on a LFS trial. Twenty-seven dystonia DBS patients were retrospectively analyzed from the UF-INFORM database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen subjects met inclusion criteria. Of the 13 subjects, all had bilateral internal pallidum (GPi) DBS, and five (38.5%) remained with at least one side on LFS settings at their last follow up (average follow up 24 months, range 6&ndash;46 months). Within the first 6 months, six (46%) subjects remained on LFS and seven (54%) were changed to high-frequency stimulation (HFS). Those who remained on LFS settings at 6 months were characterized by shorter disease durations than those on HFS settings. There were no significant differences in dystonia severity (Unified Dystonia Rating Scale and Burke&ndash;Fahn&ndash;Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale) at baseline between the two settings. The estimated battery life for LFS (79.9&plusmn;30.5) was significantly longer than for HFS settings (32.2&plusmn;13.1, p&lt;0.001)</p> <p><strong>Discussion: </strong>LFS was ultimately chosen for 38.5% of all subjects. Although this study failed to yield solid predictive features, subjects on LFS tended to have shorter disease durations.</p>https://tremorjournal.org/index.php/tremor/article/view/55
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frances M. Velez-Lago
Genko Oyama
Kelly D. Foote
Nelson Hwynn
Pamela Zeilman
Charles Jacobson
Samuel Wu
Michael S. Okun
spellingShingle Frances M. Velez-Lago
Genko Oyama
Kelly D. Foote
Nelson Hwynn
Pamela Zeilman
Charles Jacobson
Samuel Wu
Michael S. Okun
Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: Lower is Not Always Better
Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements
author_facet Frances M. Velez-Lago
Genko Oyama
Kelly D. Foote
Nelson Hwynn
Pamela Zeilman
Charles Jacobson
Samuel Wu
Michael S. Okun
author_sort Frances M. Velez-Lago
title Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: Lower is Not Always Better
title_short Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: Lower is Not Always Better
title_full Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: Lower is Not Always Better
title_fullStr Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: Lower is Not Always Better
title_full_unstemmed Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: Lower is Not Always Better
title_sort low frequency deep brain stimulation for dystonia: lower is not always better
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements
issn 2160-8288
publishDate 2012-02-01
description <p><strong>Background:</strong>&nbsp; It has been observed that low-frequency stimulation (LFS) may be effective for dystonia, and the use of LFS may alleviate the need for frequent battery changes in a subset of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze LFS as a strategy to treat deep brain stimulation (DBS) patients with various dystonias.</p> <p><strong>Methods:&nbsp;</strong>Subjects had to receive a minimum of 6 months of clinical follow-up at the University of Florida, and were required to have a minimum of 3 months on a LFS trial. Twenty-seven dystonia DBS patients were retrospectively analyzed from the UF-INFORM database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen subjects met inclusion criteria. Of the 13 subjects, all had bilateral internal pallidum (GPi) DBS, and five (38.5%) remained with at least one side on LFS settings at their last follow up (average follow up 24 months, range 6&ndash;46 months). Within the first 6 months, six (46%) subjects remained on LFS and seven (54%) were changed to high-frequency stimulation (HFS). Those who remained on LFS settings at 6 months were characterized by shorter disease durations than those on HFS settings. There were no significant differences in dystonia severity (Unified Dystonia Rating Scale and Burke&ndash;Fahn&ndash;Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale) at baseline between the two settings. The estimated battery life for LFS (79.9&plusmn;30.5) was significantly longer than for HFS settings (32.2&plusmn;13.1, p&lt;0.001)</p> <p><strong>Discussion: </strong>LFS was ultimately chosen for 38.5% of all subjects. Although this study failed to yield solid predictive features, subjects on LFS tended to have shorter disease durations.</p>
url https://tremorjournal.org/index.php/tremor/article/view/55
work_keys_str_mv AT francesmvelezlago lowfrequencydeepbrainstimulationfordystonialowerisnotalwaysbetter
AT genkooyama lowfrequencydeepbrainstimulationfordystonialowerisnotalwaysbetter
AT kellydfoote lowfrequencydeepbrainstimulationfordystonialowerisnotalwaysbetter
AT nelsonhwynn lowfrequencydeepbrainstimulationfordystonialowerisnotalwaysbetter
AT pamelazeilman lowfrequencydeepbrainstimulationfordystonialowerisnotalwaysbetter
AT charlesjacobson lowfrequencydeepbrainstimulationfordystonialowerisnotalwaysbetter
AT samuelwu lowfrequencydeepbrainstimulationfordystonialowerisnotalwaysbetter
AT michaelsokun lowfrequencydeepbrainstimulationfordystonialowerisnotalwaysbetter
_version_ 1724242541378797568