Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol

IntroductionThe anatomic variants of congenital heart disease (CHD) are multiple. The increased survival of these patients and disposition into communities has led to an increase in their acute presentation to non-CHD experts in primary care clinics and emergency departments. Given the vulnerability...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patricia Trbovich, Azadeh Assadi, Peter Laussen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/3/e035313.full
id doaj-2ac1adc9735c4b2b84b9df3197c5cba2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2ac1adc9735c4b2b84b9df3197c5cba22021-06-02T11:32:39ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-03-0110310.1136/bmjopen-2019-035313Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocolPatricia Trbovich0Azadeh Assadi1Peter Laussen24 Human Era, Department of Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 1 Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 1 Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada IntroductionThe anatomic variants of congenital heart disease (CHD) are multiple. The increased survival of these patients and disposition into communities has led to an increase in their acute presentation to non-CHD experts in primary care clinics and emergency departments. Given the vulnerability and fragility of these patients in the face of acute illness, new clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are urgently needed to better translate the best practice recommendations for the care of these patients. This study aims to understand the perceived confidence and macrocognitive processes of non-CHD experts (emergency medicine physicians) and CHD experts (paediatric cardiac intensivists) when treating children with CHD during acute illness and apply this to optimise the design of a CDSS (MyHeartPass™) for these patients.Methods and analysisThe first phase of the study involves a survey of non-CHD experts and CHD experts to understand their perceived confidence as it relates to treating acutely ill patients with CHD. The second phase is a qualitative cognitive task analysis using critical decision method to characterise and compare the macrocognitive processes used by non-CHD experts and CHD experts during the critical decision making. In phases 3 and 4, heuristic evaluation and usability testing of the CDSS will be completed. These results will be used to inform design changes to the chosen CDSS (MyHeartPass™). In the final phase, a within-participant simulation design will be used to study the effect of the CDSS on clinical decision making compared with baseline (without use of CDSS).Ethics and disseminationEthics approval from The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ontario, Canada has been obtained for all phases. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. On successful completion of these studies, it is anticipated that there will be a controlled implementation of the redesigned CDSS.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/3/e035313.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patricia Trbovich
Azadeh Assadi
Peter Laussen
spellingShingle Patricia Trbovich
Azadeh Assadi
Peter Laussen
Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol
BMJ Open
author_facet Patricia Trbovich
Azadeh Assadi
Peter Laussen
author_sort Patricia Trbovich
title Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol
title_short Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol
title_full Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol
title_fullStr Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol
title_sort mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-03-01
description IntroductionThe anatomic variants of congenital heart disease (CHD) are multiple. The increased survival of these patients and disposition into communities has led to an increase in their acute presentation to non-CHD experts in primary care clinics and emergency departments. Given the vulnerability and fragility of these patients in the face of acute illness, new clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are urgently needed to better translate the best practice recommendations for the care of these patients. This study aims to understand the perceived confidence and macrocognitive processes of non-CHD experts (emergency medicine physicians) and CHD experts (paediatric cardiac intensivists) when treating children with CHD during acute illness and apply this to optimise the design of a CDSS (MyHeartPass™) for these patients.Methods and analysisThe first phase of the study involves a survey of non-CHD experts and CHD experts to understand their perceived confidence as it relates to treating acutely ill patients with CHD. The second phase is a qualitative cognitive task analysis using critical decision method to characterise and compare the macrocognitive processes used by non-CHD experts and CHD experts during the critical decision making. In phases 3 and 4, heuristic evaluation and usability testing of the CDSS will be completed. These results will be used to inform design changes to the chosen CDSS (MyHeartPass™). In the final phase, a within-participant simulation design will be used to study the effect of the CDSS on clinical decision making compared with baseline (without use of CDSS).Ethics and disseminationEthics approval from The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ontario, Canada has been obtained for all phases. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. On successful completion of these studies, it is anticipated that there will be a controlled implementation of the redesigned CDSS.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/3/e035313.full
work_keys_str_mv AT patriciatrbovich mixedmethodsapproachtounderstandingclinicianmacrocognitioninthedesignofaclinicaldecisionsupporttoolastudyprotocol
AT azadehassadi mixedmethodsapproachtounderstandingclinicianmacrocognitioninthedesignofaclinicaldecisionsupporttoolastudyprotocol
AT peterlaussen mixedmethodsapproachtounderstandingclinicianmacrocognitioninthedesignofaclinicaldecisionsupporttoolastudyprotocol
_version_ 1721404603525758976