Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools
Abstract Aim This study aimed to review the literature on patient classification tools (PCTs) for assessing nursing strength and to compare South Korean and international tools. Design Integrative literature review. Methods We searched the relevant literature published from 2000–2017 in PubMed and t...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Nursing Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.757 |
id |
doaj-2ac4e0e6e2c148e9953088bc67efbd0d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2ac4e0e6e2c148e9953088bc67efbd0d2021-08-13T22:37:04ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582021-09-01852105211610.1002/nop2.757Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international toolsYukyung Ko0Bohyun Park1Department of Nursing College of Medicine Wonkwang University Iksan South KoreaDepartment of Nursing Changwon National University Changwon South KoreaAbstract Aim This study aimed to review the literature on patient classification tools (PCTs) for assessing nursing strength and to compare South Korean and international tools. Design Integrative literature review. Methods We searched the relevant literature published from 2000–2017 in PubMed and two electronic databases in Korea in March 2017. Twenty‐five published studies were reviewed. Results In most Korean studies, patients were classified by PCT, which were tested to ensure validity and reliability, followed by measurement of nursing time and development of the conversion index. In international studies, PCTs used were simpler than those in Korean studies; the results of estimation for optimum nurse staffing were reported. Most studies insufficiently reflected indirect nursing needs and patients’ non‐clinical factors. The current PCTs used in Korean studies inadequately reflect the reality of nursing field. Therefore, development of new PCTs reflecting nursing intensity based on direct and indirect nursing activities is necessary.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.757economicsnursingnursing staffpersonnel staffing and schedulingreviewworkforce |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yukyung Ko Bohyun Park |
spellingShingle |
Yukyung Ko Bohyun Park Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools Nursing Open economics nursing nursing staff personnel staffing and scheduling review workforce |
author_facet |
Yukyung Ko Bohyun Park |
author_sort |
Yukyung Ko |
title |
Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools |
title_short |
Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools |
title_full |
Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools |
title_fullStr |
Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools |
title_full_unstemmed |
Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools |
title_sort |
integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: focusing on comparison of south korean and international tools |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Nursing Open |
issn |
2054-1058 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Aim This study aimed to review the literature on patient classification tools (PCTs) for assessing nursing strength and to compare South Korean and international tools. Design Integrative literature review. Methods We searched the relevant literature published from 2000–2017 in PubMed and two electronic databases in Korea in March 2017. Twenty‐five published studies were reviewed. Results In most Korean studies, patients were classified by PCT, which were tested to ensure validity and reliability, followed by measurement of nursing time and development of the conversion index. In international studies, PCTs used were simpler than those in Korean studies; the results of estimation for optimum nurse staffing were reported. Most studies insufficiently reflected indirect nursing needs and patients’ non‐clinical factors. The current PCTs used in Korean studies inadequately reflect the reality of nursing field. Therefore, development of new PCTs reflecting nursing intensity based on direct and indirect nursing activities is necessary. |
topic |
economics nursing nursing staff personnel staffing and scheduling review workforce |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.757 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yukyungko integrativeliteraturereviewofpatientclassificationtoolsfornursingintensityevaluationfocusingoncomparisonofsouthkoreanandinternationaltools AT bohyunpark integrativeliteraturereviewofpatientclassificationtoolsfornursingintensityevaluationfocusingoncomparisonofsouthkoreanandinternationaltools |
_version_ |
1721208076125601792 |