Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools

Abstract Aim This study aimed to review the literature on patient classification tools (PCTs) for assessing nursing strength and to compare South Korean and international tools. Design Integrative literature review. Methods We searched the relevant literature published from 2000–2017 in PubMed and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yukyung Ko, Bohyun Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-09-01
Series:Nursing Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.757
id doaj-2ac4e0e6e2c148e9953088bc67efbd0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2ac4e0e6e2c148e9953088bc67efbd0d2021-08-13T22:37:04ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582021-09-01852105211610.1002/nop2.757Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international toolsYukyung Ko0Bohyun Park1Department of Nursing College of Medicine Wonkwang University Iksan South KoreaDepartment of Nursing Changwon National University Changwon South KoreaAbstract Aim This study aimed to review the literature on patient classification tools (PCTs) for assessing nursing strength and to compare South Korean and international tools. Design Integrative literature review. Methods We searched the relevant literature published from 2000–2017 in PubMed and two electronic databases in Korea in March 2017. Twenty‐five published studies were reviewed. Results In most Korean studies, patients were classified by PCT, which were tested to ensure validity and reliability, followed by measurement of nursing time and development of the conversion index. In international studies, PCTs used were simpler than those in Korean studies; the results of estimation for optimum nurse staffing were reported. Most studies insufficiently reflected indirect nursing needs and patients’ non‐clinical factors. The current PCTs used in Korean studies inadequately reflect the reality of nursing field. Therefore, development of new PCTs reflecting nursing intensity based on direct and indirect nursing activities is necessary.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.757economicsnursingnursing staffpersonnel staffing and schedulingreviewworkforce
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yukyung Ko
Bohyun Park
spellingShingle Yukyung Ko
Bohyun Park
Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools
Nursing Open
economics
nursing
nursing staff
personnel staffing and scheduling
review
workforce
author_facet Yukyung Ko
Bohyun Park
author_sort Yukyung Ko
title Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools
title_short Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools
title_full Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools
title_fullStr Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools
title_full_unstemmed Integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: Focusing on comparison of South Korean and international tools
title_sort integrative literature review of patient classification tools for nursing intensity evaluation: focusing on comparison of south korean and international tools
publisher Wiley
series Nursing Open
issn 2054-1058
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Aim This study aimed to review the literature on patient classification tools (PCTs) for assessing nursing strength and to compare South Korean and international tools. Design Integrative literature review. Methods We searched the relevant literature published from 2000–2017 in PubMed and two electronic databases in Korea in March 2017. Twenty‐five published studies were reviewed. Results In most Korean studies, patients were classified by PCT, which were tested to ensure validity and reliability, followed by measurement of nursing time and development of the conversion index. In international studies, PCTs used were simpler than those in Korean studies; the results of estimation for optimum nurse staffing were reported. Most studies insufficiently reflected indirect nursing needs and patients’ non‐clinical factors. The current PCTs used in Korean studies inadequately reflect the reality of nursing field. Therefore, development of new PCTs reflecting nursing intensity based on direct and indirect nursing activities is necessary.
topic economics
nursing
nursing staff
personnel staffing and scheduling
review
workforce
url https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.757
work_keys_str_mv AT yukyungko integrativeliteraturereviewofpatientclassificationtoolsfornursingintensityevaluationfocusingoncomparisonofsouthkoreanandinternationaltools
AT bohyunpark integrativeliteraturereviewofpatientclassificationtoolsfornursingintensityevaluationfocusingoncomparisonofsouthkoreanandinternationaltools
_version_ 1721208076125601792