DNA-Cytometry of Progressive and Regressive Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

A retrospective analysis was performed on archival cervical smears from a group of 56 women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), who had received follow‐up by cytology only. Automated image cytometry of Feulgen‐stained DNA was used to determine the differences between progressive and regre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonius G. J. M. Hanselaar, Neal Poulin, Martin M. M. Pahlplatz, David Garner, Calum MacAulay, Jasenka Matisic, Jean LeRiche, Branko Palcic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 1998-01-01
Series:Analytical Cellular Pathology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1998/649024
id doaj-2b0eda0b2bc649a3ad9bfb25c80a2489
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b0eda0b2bc649a3ad9bfb25c80a24892020-11-24T22:52:53ZengHindawi LimitedAnalytical Cellular Pathology0921-89121878-36511998-01-01161112710.1155/1998/649024DNA-Cytometry of Progressive and Regressive Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaAntonius G. J. M. Hanselaar0Neal Poulin1Martin M. M. Pahlplatz2David Garner3Calum MacAulay4Jasenka Matisic5Jean LeRiche6Branko Palcic7Department of Pathology, University Hospital Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, NetherlandsCancer Imaging Department, Medical Physics Division, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, CanadaDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, NetherlandsCancer Imaging Department, Medical Physics Division, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, CanadaCancer Imaging Department, Medical Physics Division, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, CanadaCancer Imaging Department, Medical Physics Division, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, CanadaCancer Imaging Department, Medical Physics Division, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, CanadaCancer Imaging Department, Medical Physics Division, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, CanadaA retrospective analysis was performed on archival cervical smears from a group of 56 women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), who had received follow‐up by cytology only. Automated image cytometry of Feulgen‐stained DNA was used to determine the differences between progressive and regressive lesions. The first group of 30 smears was from women who had developed cancer after initial smears with dysplastic changes (progressive group). The second group of 26 smears with dysplastic changes had shown regression to normal (regressive group). The goal of the study was to determine if differences in cytometric features existed between the progressive and regressive groups. CIN categories I, II and III were represented in both groups, and measurements were pooled across diagnostic categories. Images of up to 700 intermediate cells were obtained from each slide, and cells were scanned exhaustively for the detection of diagnostic cells. Discriminant function analysis was performed for both intermediate and diagnostic cells. The most significant differences between the groups were found for diagnostic cells, with a cell classification accuracy of 82%. Intermediate cells could be classified with 60% accuracy. Cytometric features which afforded the best discrimination were characteristic of the chromatin organization in diagnostic cells (nuclear texture). Slide classification was performed by thresholding the number of cells which exhibited progression associated changes (PAC) in chromatin configuration, with an accuracy of 93 and 73% for diagnostic and intermediate cells, respectively. These results indicate that regardless of the extent of nuclear atypia as reflected in the CIN category, features of chromatin organization can potentially be used to predict the malignant or progressive potential of CIN lesions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1998/649024
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antonius G. J. M. Hanselaar
Neal Poulin
Martin M. M. Pahlplatz
David Garner
Calum MacAulay
Jasenka Matisic
Jean LeRiche
Branko Palcic
spellingShingle Antonius G. J. M. Hanselaar
Neal Poulin
Martin M. M. Pahlplatz
David Garner
Calum MacAulay
Jasenka Matisic
Jean LeRiche
Branko Palcic
DNA-Cytometry of Progressive and Regressive Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Analytical Cellular Pathology
author_facet Antonius G. J. M. Hanselaar
Neal Poulin
Martin M. M. Pahlplatz
David Garner
Calum MacAulay
Jasenka Matisic
Jean LeRiche
Branko Palcic
author_sort Antonius G. J. M. Hanselaar
title DNA-Cytometry of Progressive and Regressive Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_short DNA-Cytometry of Progressive and Regressive Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_full DNA-Cytometry of Progressive and Regressive Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_fullStr DNA-Cytometry of Progressive and Regressive Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_full_unstemmed DNA-Cytometry of Progressive and Regressive Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_sort dna-cytometry of progressive and regressive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Analytical Cellular Pathology
issn 0921-8912
1878-3651
publishDate 1998-01-01
description A retrospective analysis was performed on archival cervical smears from a group of 56 women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), who had received follow‐up by cytology only. Automated image cytometry of Feulgen‐stained DNA was used to determine the differences between progressive and regressive lesions. The first group of 30 smears was from women who had developed cancer after initial smears with dysplastic changes (progressive group). The second group of 26 smears with dysplastic changes had shown regression to normal (regressive group). The goal of the study was to determine if differences in cytometric features existed between the progressive and regressive groups. CIN categories I, II and III were represented in both groups, and measurements were pooled across diagnostic categories. Images of up to 700 intermediate cells were obtained from each slide, and cells were scanned exhaustively for the detection of diagnostic cells. Discriminant function analysis was performed for both intermediate and diagnostic cells. The most significant differences between the groups were found for diagnostic cells, with a cell classification accuracy of 82%. Intermediate cells could be classified with 60% accuracy. Cytometric features which afforded the best discrimination were characteristic of the chromatin organization in diagnostic cells (nuclear texture). Slide classification was performed by thresholding the number of cells which exhibited progression associated changes (PAC) in chromatin configuration, with an accuracy of 93 and 73% for diagnostic and intermediate cells, respectively. These results indicate that regardless of the extent of nuclear atypia as reflected in the CIN category, features of chromatin organization can potentially be used to predict the malignant or progressive potential of CIN lesions.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1998/649024
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniusgjmhanselaar dnacytometryofprogressiveandregressivecervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT nealpoulin dnacytometryofprogressiveandregressivecervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT martinmmpahlplatz dnacytometryofprogressiveandregressivecervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT davidgarner dnacytometryofprogressiveandregressivecervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT calummacaulay dnacytometryofprogressiveandregressivecervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT jasenkamatisic dnacytometryofprogressiveandregressivecervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT jeanleriche dnacytometryofprogressiveandregressivecervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT brankopalcic dnacytometryofprogressiveandregressivecervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
_version_ 1725664174326939648