Subgroup Analysis of Patients with Cancer in XALIA: A Noninterventional Study of Rivaroxaban versus Standard Anticoagulation for VTE

Abstract Background The noninterventional XALIA study compared rivaroxaban with standard anticoagulation for deep vein thrombosis treatment. This substudy describes the demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of the patients with cancer. Methods Therapy type, d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Walter Ageno, Lorenzo G. Mantovani, Sylvia Haas, Reinhold Kreutz, Danja Monje, Jonas Schneider, Martin van Eickels, Martin Gebel, Alexander G. G. Turpie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-06-01
Series:TH Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0037-1603924
id doaj-2b10d9c1b2014d6fb4dec36a52549924
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b10d9c1b2014d6fb4dec36a525499242020-11-25T03:24:18ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGTH Open2512-94652017-06-010101e33e4210.1055/s-0037-1603924Subgroup Analysis of Patients with Cancer in XALIA: A Noninterventional Study of Rivaroxaban versus Standard Anticoagulation for VTEWalter Ageno0Lorenzo G. Mantovani1Sylvia Haas2Reinhold Kreutz3Danja Monje4Jonas Schneider5Martin van Eickels6Martin Gebel7Alexander G. G. Turpie8Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, ItalyCESP-Center for Public Health Research, University of Milan Bicocca, Monza, ItalyTechnical University of Munich, Munich, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, GermanyBayer AG, Leverkusen, GermanyBayer AG, Berlin, GermanyBayer AG, Berlin, GermanyBayer AG, Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Medicine, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaAbstract Background The noninterventional XALIA study compared rivaroxaban with standard anticoagulation for deep vein thrombosis treatment. This substudy describes the demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of the patients with cancer. Methods Therapy type, dose, and duration were at the physician's discretion. The cohorts identified were rivaroxaban (rivaroxaban alone or after heparin or fondaparinux for ≤48 hours); early switchers (rivaroxaban after heparin or fondaparinux for >48 hours to 14 days and/or a vitamin K antagonist [VKA] for 1–14 days); standard anticoagulation (heparin or fondaparinux and a VKA); low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) alone; and miscellaneous (other heparins, fondaparinux alone, VKA alone). Primary outcomes were major bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and all-cause mortality. Results In XALIA, 587 patients (11.4% of the XALIA cohort) were with cancer: 146 (24.9%) rivaroxaban, 30 (5.1%) early switchers, 141 (24.0%) standard anticoagulation, 223 (38.0%) LMWH, and 47 (8.0%) miscellaneous. Patients with gastrointestinal or lung cancer more commonly received LMWH than rivaroxaban; the opposite occurred in patients with breast or genitourinary cancer. Rates of primary outcome in the rivaroxaban group were as follows: major bleeding, 1.4% (n = 2); recurrent venous thromboembolism, 3.4% (n = 5); and all-cause mortality, 4.8% (n = 7). Conclusion In XALIA, physicians treated cancer-associated thrombosis with various anticoagulant regimens, most commonly LMWH. In addition, the choice of anticoagulant varied with cancer type. In rivaroxaban-treated patients, rates for the primary outcomes were low, suggesting that patients administered rivaroxaban were a good prognosis group.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0037-1603924cancer-associated thrombosislow-molecular-weight heparinrivaroxabanroutine clinical practicevenous thromboembolism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Walter Ageno
Lorenzo G. Mantovani
Sylvia Haas
Reinhold Kreutz
Danja Monje
Jonas Schneider
Martin van Eickels
Martin Gebel
Alexander G. G. Turpie
spellingShingle Walter Ageno
Lorenzo G. Mantovani
Sylvia Haas
Reinhold Kreutz
Danja Monje
Jonas Schneider
Martin van Eickels
Martin Gebel
Alexander G. G. Turpie
Subgroup Analysis of Patients with Cancer in XALIA: A Noninterventional Study of Rivaroxaban versus Standard Anticoagulation for VTE
TH Open
cancer-associated thrombosis
low-molecular-weight heparin
rivaroxaban
routine clinical practice
venous thromboembolism
author_facet Walter Ageno
Lorenzo G. Mantovani
Sylvia Haas
Reinhold Kreutz
Danja Monje
Jonas Schneider
Martin van Eickels
Martin Gebel
Alexander G. G. Turpie
author_sort Walter Ageno
title Subgroup Analysis of Patients with Cancer in XALIA: A Noninterventional Study of Rivaroxaban versus Standard Anticoagulation for VTE
title_short Subgroup Analysis of Patients with Cancer in XALIA: A Noninterventional Study of Rivaroxaban versus Standard Anticoagulation for VTE
title_full Subgroup Analysis of Patients with Cancer in XALIA: A Noninterventional Study of Rivaroxaban versus Standard Anticoagulation for VTE
title_fullStr Subgroup Analysis of Patients with Cancer in XALIA: A Noninterventional Study of Rivaroxaban versus Standard Anticoagulation for VTE
title_full_unstemmed Subgroup Analysis of Patients with Cancer in XALIA: A Noninterventional Study of Rivaroxaban versus Standard Anticoagulation for VTE
title_sort subgroup analysis of patients with cancer in xalia: a noninterventional study of rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for vte
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
series TH Open
issn 2512-9465
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Abstract Background The noninterventional XALIA study compared rivaroxaban with standard anticoagulation for deep vein thrombosis treatment. This substudy describes the demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of the patients with cancer. Methods Therapy type, dose, and duration were at the physician's discretion. The cohorts identified were rivaroxaban (rivaroxaban alone or after heparin or fondaparinux for ≤48 hours); early switchers (rivaroxaban after heparin or fondaparinux for >48 hours to 14 days and/or a vitamin K antagonist [VKA] for 1–14 days); standard anticoagulation (heparin or fondaparinux and a VKA); low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) alone; and miscellaneous (other heparins, fondaparinux alone, VKA alone). Primary outcomes were major bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and all-cause mortality. Results In XALIA, 587 patients (11.4% of the XALIA cohort) were with cancer: 146 (24.9%) rivaroxaban, 30 (5.1%) early switchers, 141 (24.0%) standard anticoagulation, 223 (38.0%) LMWH, and 47 (8.0%) miscellaneous. Patients with gastrointestinal or lung cancer more commonly received LMWH than rivaroxaban; the opposite occurred in patients with breast or genitourinary cancer. Rates of primary outcome in the rivaroxaban group were as follows: major bleeding, 1.4% (n = 2); recurrent venous thromboembolism, 3.4% (n = 5); and all-cause mortality, 4.8% (n = 7). Conclusion In XALIA, physicians treated cancer-associated thrombosis with various anticoagulant regimens, most commonly LMWH. In addition, the choice of anticoagulant varied with cancer type. In rivaroxaban-treated patients, rates for the primary outcomes were low, suggesting that patients administered rivaroxaban were a good prognosis group.
topic cancer-associated thrombosis
low-molecular-weight heparin
rivaroxaban
routine clinical practice
venous thromboembolism
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0037-1603924
work_keys_str_mv AT walterageno subgroupanalysisofpatientswithcancerinxaliaanoninterventionalstudyofrivaroxabanversusstandardanticoagulationforvte
AT lorenzogmantovani subgroupanalysisofpatientswithcancerinxaliaanoninterventionalstudyofrivaroxabanversusstandardanticoagulationforvte
AT sylviahaas subgroupanalysisofpatientswithcancerinxaliaanoninterventionalstudyofrivaroxabanversusstandardanticoagulationforvte
AT reinholdkreutz subgroupanalysisofpatientswithcancerinxaliaanoninterventionalstudyofrivaroxabanversusstandardanticoagulationforvte
AT danjamonje subgroupanalysisofpatientswithcancerinxaliaanoninterventionalstudyofrivaroxabanversusstandardanticoagulationforvte
AT jonasschneider subgroupanalysisofpatientswithcancerinxaliaanoninterventionalstudyofrivaroxabanversusstandardanticoagulationforvte
AT martinvaneickels subgroupanalysisofpatientswithcancerinxaliaanoninterventionalstudyofrivaroxabanversusstandardanticoagulationforvte
AT martingebel subgroupanalysisofpatientswithcancerinxaliaanoninterventionalstudyofrivaroxabanversusstandardanticoagulationforvte
AT alexanderggturpie subgroupanalysisofpatientswithcancerinxaliaanoninterventionalstudyofrivaroxabanversusstandardanticoagulationforvte
_version_ 1724602234795196416