The accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with polymerase chain reaction to diagnose human papillomavirus infection in the uterine cervix

<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Indonesia and other developing countries cancer is still a health problem besides infectious disease. Cervical cancer is the second most common after breast cancer. Early detection of high risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection as the causati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: I G.A.S. Mahendra Dewi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: DiscoverSys 2016-06-01
Series:Bali Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://balimedicaljournal.org/index.php/bmj/article/view/221
id doaj-2b1c69ce36bf4ad3a18100d6621c965e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b1c69ce36bf4ad3a18100d6621c965e2020-11-25T03:14:17ZengDiscoverSysBali Medical Journal2089-11802302-29142016-06-015236236510.15562/bmj.v5i2.221339The accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with polymerase chain reaction to diagnose human papillomavirus infection in the uterine cervixI G.A.S. Mahendra Dewi0Department of Pathology Anatomy Faculty of Medicine Udayana University/ Sanglah General Hospital Denpasar-Bali<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Indonesia and other developing countries cancer is still a health problem besides infectious disease. Cervical cancer is the second most common after breast cancer. Early detection of high risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection as the causative agent is very important, so that cervical lesions do not develop into precancerous lesions and cancer. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at this time is still not yet possible be used as a screening program in the wider community because the cost is quite expensive. An easier, cheaper and simpler method of examination is needed to detect earlier infection, but still has accuracy close to gold standard. This study aims to determine the accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with PCR to diagnose HPV infection in the uterine cervix.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> This is a cross-sectional diagnostic test, with predictor variable is conventional histopathology examination and outcome variable is PCR examination. The samples in this study were tissue biopsy or surgery of patients with clinically diagnosed have cervical lesion. A 2x2 table was created to calculate the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 39 samples were observed in this study. The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 72.73%, 58.82%, 69.57% and 62.50%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study found the accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with PCR to diagnose HPV infection in the uterine cervix is more than 50%.</p>https://balimedicaljournal.org/index.php/bmj/article/view/221accuracy, histopathology, pcr, hpv, uterine cervix
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I G.A.S. Mahendra Dewi
spellingShingle I G.A.S. Mahendra Dewi
The accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with polymerase chain reaction to diagnose human papillomavirus infection in the uterine cervix
Bali Medical Journal
accuracy, histopathology, pcr, hpv, uterine cervix
author_facet I G.A.S. Mahendra Dewi
author_sort I G.A.S. Mahendra Dewi
title The accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with polymerase chain reaction to diagnose human papillomavirus infection in the uterine cervix
title_short The accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with polymerase chain reaction to diagnose human papillomavirus infection in the uterine cervix
title_full The accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with polymerase chain reaction to diagnose human papillomavirus infection in the uterine cervix
title_fullStr The accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with polymerase chain reaction to diagnose human papillomavirus infection in the uterine cervix
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with polymerase chain reaction to diagnose human papillomavirus infection in the uterine cervix
title_sort accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with polymerase chain reaction to diagnose human papillomavirus infection in the uterine cervix
publisher DiscoverSys
series Bali Medical Journal
issn 2089-1180
2302-2914
publishDate 2016-06-01
description <p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Indonesia and other developing countries cancer is still a health problem besides infectious disease. Cervical cancer is the second most common after breast cancer. Early detection of high risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection as the causative agent is very important, so that cervical lesions do not develop into precancerous lesions and cancer. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at this time is still not yet possible be used as a screening program in the wider community because the cost is quite expensive. An easier, cheaper and simpler method of examination is needed to detect earlier infection, but still has accuracy close to gold standard. This study aims to determine the accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with PCR to diagnose HPV infection in the uterine cervix.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> This is a cross-sectional diagnostic test, with predictor variable is conventional histopathology examination and outcome variable is PCR examination. The samples in this study were tissue biopsy or surgery of patients with clinically diagnosed have cervical lesion. A 2x2 table was created to calculate the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 39 samples were observed in this study. The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 72.73%, 58.82%, 69.57% and 62.50%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study found the accuracy of histopathologic examination compared with PCR to diagnose HPV infection in the uterine cervix is more than 50%.</p>
topic accuracy, histopathology, pcr, hpv, uterine cervix
url https://balimedicaljournal.org/index.php/bmj/article/view/221
work_keys_str_mv AT igasmahendradewi theaccuracyofhistopathologicexaminationcomparedwithpolymerasechainreactiontodiagnosehumanpapillomavirusinfectionintheuterinecervix
AT igasmahendradewi accuracyofhistopathologicexaminationcomparedwithpolymerasechainreactiontodiagnosehumanpapillomavirusinfectionintheuterinecervix
_version_ 1724643366352715776