The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach

Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in diagnosing coeliac disease (CD). However, data on GP management of (suspected) CD patients is sparse. Objectives: To provide insights into the daily practice of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CD by GPs. Methods: A qualitative stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tom van Gils, Talha G. Senler, Henriëtte E. van der Horst, Chris J.J. Mulder, Gerd Bouma, Henk de Vries
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:European Journal of General Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1516203
id doaj-2b1f675448a542a28fff038fcb80ab62
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b1f675448a542a28fff038fcb80ab622020-11-24T21:11:50ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEuropean Journal of General Practice1381-47881751-14022018-01-0124123624210.1080/13814788.2018.15162031516203The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approachTom van Gils0Talha G. Senler1Henriëtte E. van der Horst2Chris J.J. Mulder3Gerd Bouma4Henk de Vries5Amsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical CentreAmsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical CentreAmsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical CentreAmsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical CentreAmsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical CentreAmsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical CentreBackground: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in diagnosing coeliac disease (CD). However, data on GP management of (suspected) CD patients is sparse. Objectives: To provide insights into the daily practice of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CD by GPs. Methods: A qualitative study using topic list-based semi-structured in-depth interviews with Dutch GPs with more than five years’ experience carried out between January and March 2017. GPs were purposively sampled. The number of GPs interviewed depended on when data saturation was reached. We applied content analysis to the semi-structured interviews. Results: Seven GPs were interviewed, five of whom were female. Analysis of the interviews resulted in three main themes: ‘awareness,’ ‘diagnostics’ and ‘management.’ Vague gastrointestinal symptoms and diarrhoea were often mentioned as a possible presentation of CD. Antibodies were used in CD diagnosis, although some GPs would start a gluten-free diet as a first diagnostic tool. Some GPs diagnosed CD only based on positive antibodies without referring to secondary care or duodenal biopsy analysis. GPs mentioned no role for primary care physicians in the follow-up of CD and noted the important role of dieticians in CD management. Conclusion: The different views of GPs on how to diagnose and monitor CD could be a basis for further research to improve CD detection rate and CD care.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1516203Primary carecoeliac diseasequalitative researchfollow-updiagnosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tom van Gils
Talha G. Senler
Henriëtte E. van der Horst
Chris J.J. Mulder
Gerd Bouma
Henk de Vries
spellingShingle Tom van Gils
Talha G. Senler
Henriëtte E. van der Horst
Chris J.J. Mulder
Gerd Bouma
Henk de Vries
The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
European Journal of General Practice
Primary care
coeliac disease
qualitative research
follow-up
diagnosis
author_facet Tom van Gils
Talha G. Senler
Henriëtte E. van der Horst
Chris J.J. Mulder
Gerd Bouma
Henk de Vries
author_sort Tom van Gils
title The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
title_short The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
title_full The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
title_fullStr The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
title_full_unstemmed The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
title_sort daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: a qualitative approach
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series European Journal of General Practice
issn 1381-4788
1751-1402
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in diagnosing coeliac disease (CD). However, data on GP management of (suspected) CD patients is sparse. Objectives: To provide insights into the daily practice of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CD by GPs. Methods: A qualitative study using topic list-based semi-structured in-depth interviews with Dutch GPs with more than five years’ experience carried out between January and March 2017. GPs were purposively sampled. The number of GPs interviewed depended on when data saturation was reached. We applied content analysis to the semi-structured interviews. Results: Seven GPs were interviewed, five of whom were female. Analysis of the interviews resulted in three main themes: ‘awareness,’ ‘diagnostics’ and ‘management.’ Vague gastrointestinal symptoms and diarrhoea were often mentioned as a possible presentation of CD. Antibodies were used in CD diagnosis, although some GPs would start a gluten-free diet as a first diagnostic tool. Some GPs diagnosed CD only based on positive antibodies without referring to secondary care or duodenal biopsy analysis. GPs mentioned no role for primary care physicians in the follow-up of CD and noted the important role of dieticians in CD management. Conclusion: The different views of GPs on how to diagnose and monitor CD could be a basis for further research to improve CD detection rate and CD care.
topic Primary care
coeliac disease
qualitative research
follow-up
diagnosis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1516203
work_keys_str_mv AT tomvangils thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT talhagsenler thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT henrietteevanderhorst thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT chrisjjmulder thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT gerdbouma thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT henkdevries thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT tomvangils dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT talhagsenler dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT henrietteevanderhorst dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT chrisjjmulder dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT gerdbouma dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT henkdevries dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
_version_ 1716752544146915328