The gas holdup in a multiphase reciprocating plate column filled with carboxymethylcellulose solutions

Gas holdup was investigated in a gas–liquid and gas–liquid-solid reciprocating plate column (RPC) under various operation conditions. Aqueous carboxymethylcellulose (sodium salt, CMC) solutions were used as the liquid phase, the solid phase was spheres placed into interplate spaces, and the gas plas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. S. STAMENKOVIC, OLIVERA S. STAMENKOVIC, IVANA B. BANKOVIC-ILIC, M. L. LAZIC, V. B. VELJKOVIC, D. U. SKALA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Serbian Chemical Society 2005-12-01
Series:Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.shd.org.yu/HtDocs/SHD/vol70/No12/JSCS_V70_No12-15.pdf
Description
Summary:Gas holdup was investigated in a gas–liquid and gas–liquid-solid reciprocating plate column (RPC) under various operation conditions. Aqueous carboxymethylcellulose (sodium salt, CMC) solutions were used as the liquid phase, the solid phase was spheres placed into interplate spaces, and the gas plase was air. The gas holdup in the RPC was influenced by: the vibration intensity, i.e., the power consumption, the superficial gas velocity, the solids content and the rheological properties of the liquid phase. The gas holdup increased with increasing vibration intensity and superficial gas velocity in both the two- and three-phase system. With increasing concentration of the CMC PP 50 solution (Newtonian fluid), the gas holdup decreased, because the coalescence of the bubbles was favored by the higher liquid viscosity. In the case of the CMC PP 200 solutions (non-Newtonian liquids), the gas holdup depends on the combined influence of the rheological properties of the liquid phase, the vibration intensity and the superficial gas velocity. The gas holdup in the three-phase systems was greater than that in the two-phase ones under the same operating conditions. Increasing the solids content has little influence on the gas holdup. The gas holdup was correlated with the power consumption (either the time-averaged or total power consuption) and the superficial gas velocity.
ISSN:0352-5139