Evaluation of oral histories and life stories

Oral histories and life stories, as specific “documents of life” (K. Plummer) and narrative forms, have hybrid genre structure, a particular relation to reality, and the process of their evaluation poses different methodological questions. The use of oral histories and life stories as resou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Petrović Sonja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Ethnography, SASA, Belgrade 2018-01-01
Series:Glasnik Etnografskog Instituta SANU
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-0861/2018/0350-08611802319P.pdf
id doaj-2b54ddeb149c4758aeb1ac3b3da96c44
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b54ddeb149c4758aeb1ac3b3da96c442021-01-02T09:03:18ZengInstitute of Ethnography, SASA, BelgradeGlasnik Etnografskog Instituta SANU0350-08612334-82592018-01-0166231933110.2298/GEI1802319P0350-08611802319PEvaluation of oral histories and life storiesPetrović Sonja0Filološki fakultet, BeogradOral histories and life stories, as specific “documents of life” (K. Plummer) and narrative forms, have hybrid genre structure, a particular relation to reality, and the process of their evaluation poses different methodological questions. The use of oral histories and life stories as resources and evidence is especially complex issue. These texts are subjective with regard to reconstruction of memories and construction of narratives, as well as intersubjective and dialogical, considering that they are created collaboratively by the interviewee and the interviewer, starting from the conceptualisation of the interview up to its interpretation. The paper discusses the criteria for validity and reliability in oral histories and life stories, which concern advantages and limitations of a field interview (i.e. oral history and life story method), and aspects of constructing narrative identity in oral history and life story interview. The interview is considered to be a form of a heuristic collaboration between interviewer and interviewee, with their shared authority in a dialogue. However, there can be certain methodological limitations regarding, for example, conduction of an interview, relation between participants in a research, interpretation of data, influence of a particular context, employment of specific narrative or linguistic conventions in the construction of narration, and they may affect evaluation. In the final section the importance and forms of evaluation in narrating is discussed. Relaying on sociolinguistic and narrative analysis studies, some characteristic evaluating techniques in narratives are outlined, and also the way how evaluation is connected with other components of the content and the structure of a narrative. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. 178010: Jezik, folklor i migracije na Balkanu]http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-0861/2018/0350-08611802319P.pdforal historylife storiesinterviewevaluationvaliditynarrative
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Petrović Sonja
spellingShingle Petrović Sonja
Evaluation of oral histories and life stories
Glasnik Etnografskog Instituta SANU
oral history
life stories
interview
evaluation
validity
narrative
author_facet Petrović Sonja
author_sort Petrović Sonja
title Evaluation of oral histories and life stories
title_short Evaluation of oral histories and life stories
title_full Evaluation of oral histories and life stories
title_fullStr Evaluation of oral histories and life stories
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of oral histories and life stories
title_sort evaluation of oral histories and life stories
publisher Institute of Ethnography, SASA, Belgrade
series Glasnik Etnografskog Instituta SANU
issn 0350-0861
2334-8259
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Oral histories and life stories, as specific “documents of life” (K. Plummer) and narrative forms, have hybrid genre structure, a particular relation to reality, and the process of their evaluation poses different methodological questions. The use of oral histories and life stories as resources and evidence is especially complex issue. These texts are subjective with regard to reconstruction of memories and construction of narratives, as well as intersubjective and dialogical, considering that they are created collaboratively by the interviewee and the interviewer, starting from the conceptualisation of the interview up to its interpretation. The paper discusses the criteria for validity and reliability in oral histories and life stories, which concern advantages and limitations of a field interview (i.e. oral history and life story method), and aspects of constructing narrative identity in oral history and life story interview. The interview is considered to be a form of a heuristic collaboration between interviewer and interviewee, with their shared authority in a dialogue. However, there can be certain methodological limitations regarding, for example, conduction of an interview, relation between participants in a research, interpretation of data, influence of a particular context, employment of specific narrative or linguistic conventions in the construction of narration, and they may affect evaluation. In the final section the importance and forms of evaluation in narrating is discussed. Relaying on sociolinguistic and narrative analysis studies, some characteristic evaluating techniques in narratives are outlined, and also the way how evaluation is connected with other components of the content and the structure of a narrative. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. 178010: Jezik, folklor i migracije na Balkanu]
topic oral history
life stories
interview
evaluation
validity
narrative
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-0861/2018/0350-08611802319P.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT petrovicsonja evaluationoforalhistoriesandlifestories
_version_ 1724356246635544576