Performance of joint modelling of time-to-event data with time-dependent predictors: an assessment based on transition to psychosis data

Joint modelling has emerged to be a potential tool to analyse data with a time-to-event outcome and longitudinal measurements collected over a series of time points. Joint modelling involves the simultaneous modelling of the two components, namely the time-to-event component and the longitudinal com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hok Pan Yuen, Andrew Mackinnon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2016-10-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/2582.pdf
id doaj-2b57bf9116114ad9824782587416b41b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b57bf9116114ad9824782587416b41b2020-11-25T00:02:52ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592016-10-014e258210.7717/peerj.2582Performance of joint modelling of time-to-event data with time-dependent predictors: an assessment based on transition to psychosis dataHok Pan Yuen0Andrew Mackinnon1Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaJoint modelling has emerged to be a potential tool to analyse data with a time-to-event outcome and longitudinal measurements collected over a series of time points. Joint modelling involves the simultaneous modelling of the two components, namely the time-to-event component and the longitudinal component. The main challenges of joint modelling are the mathematical and computational complexity. Recent advances in joint modelling have seen the emergence of several software packages which have implemented some of the computational requirements to run joint models. These packages have opened the door for more routine use of joint modelling. Through simulations and real data based on transition to psychosis research, we compared joint model analysis of time-to-event outcome with the conventional Cox regression analysis. We also compared a number of packages for fitting joint models. Our results suggest that joint modelling do have advantages over conventional analysis despite its potential complexity. Our results also suggest that the results of analyses may depend on how the methodology is implemented.https://peerj.com/articles/2582.pdfJoint modellingSimulationsSoftware packagesTime-to-event outcomeTransition to psychosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hok Pan Yuen
Andrew Mackinnon
spellingShingle Hok Pan Yuen
Andrew Mackinnon
Performance of joint modelling of time-to-event data with time-dependent predictors: an assessment based on transition to psychosis data
PeerJ
Joint modelling
Simulations
Software packages
Time-to-event outcome
Transition to psychosis
author_facet Hok Pan Yuen
Andrew Mackinnon
author_sort Hok Pan Yuen
title Performance of joint modelling of time-to-event data with time-dependent predictors: an assessment based on transition to psychosis data
title_short Performance of joint modelling of time-to-event data with time-dependent predictors: an assessment based on transition to psychosis data
title_full Performance of joint modelling of time-to-event data with time-dependent predictors: an assessment based on transition to psychosis data
title_fullStr Performance of joint modelling of time-to-event data with time-dependent predictors: an assessment based on transition to psychosis data
title_full_unstemmed Performance of joint modelling of time-to-event data with time-dependent predictors: an assessment based on transition to psychosis data
title_sort performance of joint modelling of time-to-event data with time-dependent predictors: an assessment based on transition to psychosis data
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Joint modelling has emerged to be a potential tool to analyse data with a time-to-event outcome and longitudinal measurements collected over a series of time points. Joint modelling involves the simultaneous modelling of the two components, namely the time-to-event component and the longitudinal component. The main challenges of joint modelling are the mathematical and computational complexity. Recent advances in joint modelling have seen the emergence of several software packages which have implemented some of the computational requirements to run joint models. These packages have opened the door for more routine use of joint modelling. Through simulations and real data based on transition to psychosis research, we compared joint model analysis of time-to-event outcome with the conventional Cox regression analysis. We also compared a number of packages for fitting joint models. Our results suggest that joint modelling do have advantages over conventional analysis despite its potential complexity. Our results also suggest that the results of analyses may depend on how the methodology is implemented.
topic Joint modelling
Simulations
Software packages
Time-to-event outcome
Transition to psychosis
url https://peerj.com/articles/2582.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hokpanyuen performanceofjointmodellingoftimetoeventdatawithtimedependentpredictorsanassessmentbasedontransitiontopsychosisdata
AT andrewmackinnon performanceofjointmodellingoftimetoeventdatawithtimedependentpredictorsanassessmentbasedontransitiontopsychosisdata
_version_ 1725436290313224192