Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping
Attachments between non-human animals of different species are surprisingly common in situations involving human agency (e.g., homes, zoos, and wildlife parks). However, cross-species animal friendships analogous to pet-keeping by humans are at least rare and possibly non-existent in nature. Why has...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Animal Behavior and Cognition
2014-08-01
|
Series: | Animal Behavior and Cognition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/3/06.Herzog_FINAL.pdf |
id |
doaj-2b5d1a426b554f96af6e08c02504cf1b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2b5d1a426b554f96af6e08c02504cf1b2020-11-24T21:16:03ZengAnimal Behavior and CognitionAnimal Behavior and Cognition2372-50522372-43232014-08-011329630810.12966/abc.08.06.2014Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-KeepingHarold A. HerzogAttachments between non-human animals of different species are surprisingly common in situations involving human agency (e.g., homes, zoos, and wildlife parks). However, cross-species animal friendships analogous to pet-keeping by humans are at least rare and possibly non-existent in nature. Why has pet-keeping evolved only in Homo sapiens? I review theories that explain pet-keeping either as an adaptation or an evolutionary by-product. I suggest that these explanations cannot account for the wide variation in the distribution and forms of pet-keeping across human societies and over historical time. Using fluctuations in the popularity of dog breeds in the United States, I show how shifts in choices of pets follow the rapid changes in preferences that characterize fashion cycles. I argue that while humans possess some innate traits that facilitate attachment to members of other species (e.g., parental urges, attraction to creatures with infantile features), pet-keeping is largely a product of social learning and imitation-based cultural evolution.http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/3/06.Herzog_FINAL.pdfPet-keepingCultural transmissionCultural evolutionInterspecies attachmentAdaptationismBiophiliaCross-species adoption |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Harold A. Herzog |
spellingShingle |
Harold A. Herzog Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping Animal Behavior and Cognition Pet-keeping Cultural transmission Cultural evolution Interspecies attachment Adaptationism Biophilia Cross-species adoption |
author_facet |
Harold A. Herzog |
author_sort |
Harold A. Herzog |
title |
Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping |
title_short |
Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping |
title_full |
Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping |
title_fullStr |
Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping |
title_sort |
biology, culture, and the origins of pet-keeping |
publisher |
Animal Behavior and Cognition |
series |
Animal Behavior and Cognition |
issn |
2372-5052 2372-4323 |
publishDate |
2014-08-01 |
description |
Attachments between non-human animals of different species are surprisingly common in situations involving human agency (e.g., homes, zoos, and wildlife parks). However, cross-species animal friendships analogous to pet-keeping by humans are at least rare and possibly non-existent in nature. Why has pet-keeping evolved only in Homo sapiens? I review theories that explain pet-keeping either as an adaptation or an evolutionary by-product. I suggest that these explanations cannot account for the wide variation in the distribution and forms of pet-keeping across human societies and over historical time. Using fluctuations in the popularity of dog breeds in the United States, I show how shifts in choices of pets follow the rapid changes in preferences that characterize fashion cycles. I argue that while humans possess some innate traits that facilitate attachment to members of other species (e.g., parental urges, attraction to creatures with infantile features), pet-keeping is largely a product of social learning and imitation-based cultural evolution. |
topic |
Pet-keeping Cultural transmission Cultural evolution Interspecies attachment Adaptationism Biophilia Cross-species adoption |
url |
http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/3/06.Herzog_FINAL.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT haroldaherzog biologycultureandtheoriginsofpetkeeping |
_version_ |
1726017394838601728 |