Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping

Attachments between non-human animals of different species are surprisingly common in situations involving human agency (e.g., homes, zoos, and wildlife parks). However, cross-species animal friendships analogous to pet-keeping by humans are at least rare and possibly non-existent in nature. Why has...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harold A. Herzog
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Animal Behavior and Cognition 2014-08-01
Series:Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/3/06.Herzog_FINAL.pdf
id doaj-2b5d1a426b554f96af6e08c02504cf1b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b5d1a426b554f96af6e08c02504cf1b2020-11-24T21:16:03ZengAnimal Behavior and CognitionAnimal Behavior and Cognition2372-50522372-43232014-08-011329630810.12966/abc.08.06.2014Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-KeepingHarold A. HerzogAttachments between non-human animals of different species are surprisingly common in situations involving human agency (e.g., homes, zoos, and wildlife parks). However, cross-species animal friendships analogous to pet-keeping by humans are at least rare and possibly non-existent in nature. Why has pet-keeping evolved only in Homo sapiens? I review theories that explain pet-keeping either as an adaptation or an evolutionary by-product. I suggest that these explanations cannot account for the wide variation in the distribution and forms of pet-keeping across human societies and over historical time. Using fluctuations in the popularity of dog breeds in the United States, I show how shifts in choices of pets follow the rapid changes in preferences that characterize fashion cycles. I argue that while humans possess some innate traits that facilitate attachment to members of other species (e.g., parental urges, attraction to creatures with infantile features), pet-keeping is largely a product of social learning and imitation-based cultural evolution.http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/3/06.Herzog_FINAL.pdfPet-keepingCultural transmissionCultural evolutionInterspecies attachmentAdaptationismBiophiliaCross-species adoption
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Harold A. Herzog
spellingShingle Harold A. Herzog
Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping
Animal Behavior and Cognition
Pet-keeping
Cultural transmission
Cultural evolution
Interspecies attachment
Adaptationism
Biophilia
Cross-species adoption
author_facet Harold A. Herzog
author_sort Harold A. Herzog
title Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping
title_short Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping
title_full Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping
title_fullStr Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping
title_full_unstemmed Biology, Culture, and the Origins of Pet-Keeping
title_sort biology, culture, and the origins of pet-keeping
publisher Animal Behavior and Cognition
series Animal Behavior and Cognition
issn 2372-5052
2372-4323
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Attachments between non-human animals of different species are surprisingly common in situations involving human agency (e.g., homes, zoos, and wildlife parks). However, cross-species animal friendships analogous to pet-keeping by humans are at least rare and possibly non-existent in nature. Why has pet-keeping evolved only in Homo sapiens? I review theories that explain pet-keeping either as an adaptation or an evolutionary by-product. I suggest that these explanations cannot account for the wide variation in the distribution and forms of pet-keeping across human societies and over historical time. Using fluctuations in the popularity of dog breeds in the United States, I show how shifts in choices of pets follow the rapid changes in preferences that characterize fashion cycles. I argue that while humans possess some innate traits that facilitate attachment to members of other species (e.g., parental urges, attraction to creatures with infantile features), pet-keeping is largely a product of social learning and imitation-based cultural evolution.
topic Pet-keeping
Cultural transmission
Cultural evolution
Interspecies attachment
Adaptationism
Biophilia
Cross-species adoption
url http://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/3/06.Herzog_FINAL.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT haroldaherzog biologycultureandtheoriginsofpetkeeping
_version_ 1726017394838601728