Comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry

The safe and effective treatment of uncooperative or combative preschool children with extensive dental needs is one of pediatric dentist′s ongoing challenges. The traditional methods of behavior management are no longer acceptable to parents as they are not ready to spare more time for d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Damle S, Gandhi M, Laheri V
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2008-09-01
Series:Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2008;volume=26;issue=3;spage=97;epage=101;aulast=Damle
id doaj-2b8b65ce939f43da8d26b7b8054a9cd8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b8b65ce939f43da8d26b7b8054a9cd82020-11-24T22:57:27ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43882008-09-0126397101Comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistryDamle SGandhi MLaheri VThe safe and effective treatment of uncooperative or combative preschool children with extensive dental needs is one of pediatric dentist′s ongoing challenges. The traditional methods of behavior management are no longer acceptable to parents as they are not ready to spare more time for dental treatment of their children. Keeping this in mind, the present study was designed and carried out to evaluate the sedative effects of oral ketamine and oral midazolam prior to general anesthesia. Twenty uncooperative children in the age-group of 2-6 years were selected after thorough medical examination and investigations. Informed consent was obtained from the parent. This was a randomized double-blind study. An anesthesiologist administered either 0.5 mg/kg midazolam or 5 mg/kg ketamine orally. The heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded at regular intervals. The sedation and anxiolysis scores were also recorded. The parents were asked to answer a questionnaire at the follow-up session the next day on the surgical experience of the parent and the child and side effects experienced, if any. When the data was subjected to statistical analysis, it was observed that both drugs resulted in adequate sedation at the end of 30 min, with oral midazolam providing significantly better anxiolysis. The heart rate and respiratory rate were marginally higher with oral ketamine. The questionnaire revealed a better response with oral midazolam; side effects were more prominent with oral ketamine.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2008;volume=26;issue=3;spage=97;epage=101;aulast=DamleOral ketamineoral midazolamsedative agents
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Damle S
Gandhi M
Laheri V
spellingShingle Damle S
Gandhi M
Laheri V
Comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry
Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
Oral ketamine
oral midazolam
sedative agents
author_facet Damle S
Gandhi M
Laheri V
author_sort Damle S
title Comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry
title_short Comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry
title_full Comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry
title_fullStr Comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry
title_sort comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
issn 0970-4388
publishDate 2008-09-01
description The safe and effective treatment of uncooperative or combative preschool children with extensive dental needs is one of pediatric dentist′s ongoing challenges. The traditional methods of behavior management are no longer acceptable to parents as they are not ready to spare more time for dental treatment of their children. Keeping this in mind, the present study was designed and carried out to evaluate the sedative effects of oral ketamine and oral midazolam prior to general anesthesia. Twenty uncooperative children in the age-group of 2-6 years were selected after thorough medical examination and investigations. Informed consent was obtained from the parent. This was a randomized double-blind study. An anesthesiologist administered either 0.5 mg/kg midazolam or 5 mg/kg ketamine orally. The heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded at regular intervals. The sedation and anxiolysis scores were also recorded. The parents were asked to answer a questionnaire at the follow-up session the next day on the surgical experience of the parent and the child and side effects experienced, if any. When the data was subjected to statistical analysis, it was observed that both drugs resulted in adequate sedation at the end of 30 min, with oral midazolam providing significantly better anxiolysis. The heart rate and respiratory rate were marginally higher with oral ketamine. The questionnaire revealed a better response with oral midazolam; side effects were more prominent with oral ketamine.
topic Oral ketamine
oral midazolam
sedative agents
url http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2008;volume=26;issue=3;spage=97;epage=101;aulast=Damle
work_keys_str_mv AT damles comparisonoforalketamineandoralmidazolamassedativeagentsinpediatricdentistry
AT gandhim comparisonoforalketamineandoralmidazolamassedativeagentsinpediatricdentistry
AT laheriv comparisonoforalketamineandoralmidazolamassedativeagentsinpediatricdentistry
_version_ 1725650714154237952