Divine Hysteria. Readings of the Sacred Disease in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries

While historians have explored the deployment of medical expertisein studies of the supernatural for some time, the medical report on supernaturalphenomena thus far has evaded similar scholarly attention. Thischapter puts the expert report centre stage and focuses on the religious contextof ‘hyster...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tine Van Osselaer, Kristof Smeyers
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: StudienVerlag 2021-01-01
Series:Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5565
id doaj-2b9c7df1b3c942158f11bca20ff20a67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b9c7df1b3c942158f11bca20ff20a672021-03-18T20:45:34ZdeuStudienVerlagÖsterreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften1016-765X2707-966X2021-01-0131310.25365/oezg-2020-31-3-4Divine Hysteria. Readings of the Sacred Disease in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth CenturiesTine Van Osselaer0Kristof Smeyers1Ruusbroec Institute, University of AntwerpRuusbroec Institute, University of Antwerp While historians have explored the deployment of medical expertisein studies of the supernatural for some time, the medical report on supernaturalphenomena thus far has evaded similar scholarly attention. Thischapter puts the expert report centre stage and focuses on the religious contextof ‘hysteria’ diagnoses. Through an analysis of two controversial mysticswho were examined and diagnosed with corporeal symptoms of the ‘sacreddisease’ even though their cultural contexts differ substantially, we argue thata historicised reading of the report that integrates the circumstances of itsproduction as well as its circulation, reiterations, and legacies allows for anexamination of the genre’s role as source for wider (counter) expertise andauthority in evaluations of the supernatural. https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5565religionhysteriamedical expertisesupernaturalMagdalena LogerJohn Nichols Thom
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tine Van Osselaer
Kristof Smeyers
spellingShingle Tine Van Osselaer
Kristof Smeyers
Divine Hysteria. Readings of the Sacred Disease in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries
Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
religion
hysteria
medical expertise
supernatural
Magdalena Loger
John Nichols Thom
author_facet Tine Van Osselaer
Kristof Smeyers
author_sort Tine Van Osselaer
title Divine Hysteria. Readings of the Sacred Disease in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries
title_short Divine Hysteria. Readings of the Sacred Disease in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries
title_full Divine Hysteria. Readings of the Sacred Disease in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries
title_fullStr Divine Hysteria. Readings of the Sacred Disease in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries
title_full_unstemmed Divine Hysteria. Readings of the Sacred Disease in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries
title_sort divine hysteria. readings of the sacred disease in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries
publisher StudienVerlag
series Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
issn 1016-765X
2707-966X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description While historians have explored the deployment of medical expertisein studies of the supernatural for some time, the medical report on supernaturalphenomena thus far has evaded similar scholarly attention. Thischapter puts the expert report centre stage and focuses on the religious contextof ‘hysteria’ diagnoses. Through an analysis of two controversial mysticswho were examined and diagnosed with corporeal symptoms of the ‘sacreddisease’ even though their cultural contexts differ substantially, we argue thata historicised reading of the report that integrates the circumstances of itsproduction as well as its circulation, reiterations, and legacies allows for anexamination of the genre’s role as source for wider (counter) expertise andauthority in evaluations of the supernatural.
topic religion
hysteria
medical expertise
supernatural
Magdalena Loger
John Nichols Thom
url https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5565
work_keys_str_mv AT tinevanosselaer divinehysteriareadingsofthesacreddiseaseinthelateeighteenthandearlynineteenthcenturies
AT kristofsmeyers divinehysteriareadingsofthesacreddiseaseinthelateeighteenthandearlynineteenthcenturies
_version_ 1724215231151865856