‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’

Abstract Background European legislation dictates that pig tail docking is not allowed to be performed routinely (European Union. Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. OJ L 47, 18.2.2009). Nevertheless, tail docking is still pract...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nancy De Briyne, Charlotte Berg, Thomas Blaha, Andreas Palzer, Déborah Temple
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-11-01
Series:Porcine Health Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40813-018-0103-8
id doaj-2b9f3419c5a44e118e3f318bbe776057
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b9f3419c5a44e118e3f318bbe7760572020-11-25T01:29:44ZengBMCPorcine Health Management2055-56602018-11-01411910.1186/s40813-018-0103-8‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’Nancy De Briyne0Charlotte Berg1Thomas Blaha2Andreas Palzer3Déborah Temple4Federation of Veterinarians of EuropeDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGerman Veterinary Association for Animal WelfareClinic for Swine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University MunichUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Farm Animal Welfare Education CenterAbstract Background European legislation dictates that pig tail docking is not allowed to be performed routinely (European Union. Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. OJ L 47, 18.2.2009). Nevertheless, tail docking is still practiced routinely in many European countries, while four countries stopped routine tail docking completely. Tail docking is also practiced in many countries outside Europe. The Federation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE), the European Association of Porcine Health Management (EAPHM) together with the European Commission carried out an online survey to investigate the situation regarding the practice of pig tail docking and the provision of enrichment material across 24 European countries. It also focuses on the role of the veterinary profession and gives an overview on published literature regarding the challenges and possibilities related to the raising of pigs with intact tails. Results Fifty-seven (57) usable survey responses from 24 countries were received. On average 77% (median = 95%) of pigs are routinely tail-docked. In Finland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, less than 5% of the pigs are tail-docked. According to the respondents, 67% of pigs (median = 76%) across the 24 EU countries surveyed are given suitable enrichment materials. Training of veterinary practitioners, their role in advising the producer and undertaking a risk assessment of tail biting were more positively valued in countries that stopped routine tail docking than in countries that had not stopped routine tail docking. Initiatives such as training from national authorities to encourage abandoning tail docking and routine recording of tail biting at the slaughterhouse were identified as two successful items to promote the raising of pigs with entire tails. Conclusion In many European countries the majority of the pigs are still routinely tail-docked, which is a violation of the European legislation. To stop routine tail docking it is necessary to raise the awareness and education about risk factors to prevent tail biting. The growing knowledge about the reasons for failing voluntary national initiatives as well as about successful measures taken by some countries to make pig production with intact tails feasible should be distributed throughout the EU pig producing community. The veterinary profession has a significant role to play in raising awareness, facilitate knowledge transfer and to identify risk factors and solutions on farm level for the benefit of pig health and welfare.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40813-018-0103-8Animal welfareEnrichment materialsMutilationsStrawSwineTail biting
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nancy De Briyne
Charlotte Berg
Thomas Blaha
Andreas Palzer
Déborah Temple
spellingShingle Nancy De Briyne
Charlotte Berg
Thomas Blaha
Andreas Palzer
Déborah Temple
‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’
Porcine Health Management
Animal welfare
Enrichment materials
Mutilations
Straw
Swine
Tail biting
author_facet Nancy De Briyne
Charlotte Berg
Thomas Blaha
Andreas Palzer
Déborah Temple
author_sort Nancy De Briyne
title ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’
title_short ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’
title_full ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’
title_fullStr ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’
title_full_unstemmed ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’
title_sort ‘phasing out pig tail docking in the eu - present state, challenges and possibilities’
publisher BMC
series Porcine Health Management
issn 2055-5660
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Abstract Background European legislation dictates that pig tail docking is not allowed to be performed routinely (European Union. Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. OJ L 47, 18.2.2009). Nevertheless, tail docking is still practiced routinely in many European countries, while four countries stopped routine tail docking completely. Tail docking is also practiced in many countries outside Europe. The Federation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE), the European Association of Porcine Health Management (EAPHM) together with the European Commission carried out an online survey to investigate the situation regarding the practice of pig tail docking and the provision of enrichment material across 24 European countries. It also focuses on the role of the veterinary profession and gives an overview on published literature regarding the challenges and possibilities related to the raising of pigs with intact tails. Results Fifty-seven (57) usable survey responses from 24 countries were received. On average 77% (median = 95%) of pigs are routinely tail-docked. In Finland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, less than 5% of the pigs are tail-docked. According to the respondents, 67% of pigs (median = 76%) across the 24 EU countries surveyed are given suitable enrichment materials. Training of veterinary practitioners, their role in advising the producer and undertaking a risk assessment of tail biting were more positively valued in countries that stopped routine tail docking than in countries that had not stopped routine tail docking. Initiatives such as training from national authorities to encourage abandoning tail docking and routine recording of tail biting at the slaughterhouse were identified as two successful items to promote the raising of pigs with entire tails. Conclusion In many European countries the majority of the pigs are still routinely tail-docked, which is a violation of the European legislation. To stop routine tail docking it is necessary to raise the awareness and education about risk factors to prevent tail biting. The growing knowledge about the reasons for failing voluntary national initiatives as well as about successful measures taken by some countries to make pig production with intact tails feasible should be distributed throughout the EU pig producing community. The veterinary profession has a significant role to play in raising awareness, facilitate knowledge transfer and to identify risk factors and solutions on farm level for the benefit of pig health and welfare.
topic Animal welfare
Enrichment materials
Mutilations
Straw
Swine
Tail biting
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40813-018-0103-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nancydebriyne phasingoutpigtaildockingintheeupresentstatechallengesandpossibilities
AT charlotteberg phasingoutpigtaildockingintheeupresentstatechallengesandpossibilities
AT thomasblaha phasingoutpigtaildockingintheeupresentstatechallengesandpossibilities
AT andreaspalzer phasingoutpigtaildockingintheeupresentstatechallengesandpossibilities
AT deborahtemple phasingoutpigtaildockingintheeupresentstatechallengesandpossibilities
_version_ 1725095174204293120