Exegeting Sūra al Fātiḥa for the Masses: Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and Haji Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmar

Purpose: This article considers exegetical perspectives on the best known Sūra of the Qur’ān from two exegetes who lived in diverse contexts in the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Caliphate. Bediüzzaman Said Nursi is arguably the most influential theologian to emerge from  in Ottoman T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: بيتر ريدل
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Qatar University Press 2021-01-01
Series:مجلة كلية الشريعة والدراسات الإسلامية
Subjects:
Online Access:https://185.37.108.12/index.php/sharia/article/view/1731
id doaj-2ba562c9584346c7ac9698d12d4ef30a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2ba562c9584346c7ac9698d12d4ef30a2021-09-06T10:55:59ZaraQatar University Pressمجلة كلية الشريعة والدراسات الإسلامية2305-55452523-17152021-01-01382Exegeting Sūra al Fātiḥa for the Masses: Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and Haji Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmarبيتر ريدل Purpose: This article considers exegetical perspectives on the best known Sūra of the Qur’ān from two exegetes who lived in diverse contexts in the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Caliphate. Bediüzzaman Said Nursi is arguably the most influential theologian to emerge from  in Ottoman Turkey in its long history. Haji Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmar, by contrast, enjoys a local reputation as a scholar in the Malay-Indonesian region but is unknown outside of that area. Methodology: This research is based on a comparative analysis of the exegesis of both scholars on Sūra al-Fātiḥa, exploring the techniques they used to reach ordinary Muslims with their exegesis, not just highly educated Muslims. Findings: Said Nursi and Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmar came from quite different backgrounds and contexts. Moreover, their exegetical styles were fundamentally different, with the former’s being more thematic and the latter’s being more literalist. Nevertheless, each succeeded in producing exegesis that reached the masses, thereby meeting their overall goals of reinforcing the commitment to faith and dynamic spirit of Muslims in their respective contexts. Originality: This research is original in various ways. First, comparative studies of Said Nursi and Malay-language exegetes are few in number. Second, the identification of similarities in the results of studies on exegesis despite the use of different methods requires greater scholarly attention. This article should stimulate interest in further studies on the matter. https://185.37.108.12/index.php/sharia/article/view/1731TafsīrSaid NursiSūrah al-FātiḥaMalay-IndonesianRisale-I Nur
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author بيتر ريدل
spellingShingle بيتر ريدل
Exegeting Sūra al Fātiḥa for the Masses: Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and Haji Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmar
مجلة كلية الشريعة والدراسات الإسلامية
Tafsīr
Said Nursi
Sūrah al-Fātiḥa
Malay-Indonesian
Risale-I Nur
author_facet بيتر ريدل
author_sort بيتر ريدل
title Exegeting Sūra al Fātiḥa for the Masses: Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and Haji Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmar
title_short Exegeting Sūra al Fātiḥa for the Masses: Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and Haji Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmar
title_full Exegeting Sūra al Fātiḥa for the Masses: Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and Haji Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmar
title_fullStr Exegeting Sūra al Fātiḥa for the Masses: Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and Haji Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmar
title_full_unstemmed Exegeting Sūra al Fātiḥa for the Masses: Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and Haji Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmar
title_sort exegeting sūra al fātiḥa for the masses: bediüzzaman said nursi and haji muḥammad saʿīd bin ʿumar
publisher Qatar University Press
series مجلة كلية الشريعة والدراسات الإسلامية
issn 2305-5545
2523-1715
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose: This article considers exegetical perspectives on the best known Sūra of the Qur’ān from two exegetes who lived in diverse contexts in the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Caliphate. Bediüzzaman Said Nursi is arguably the most influential theologian to emerge from  in Ottoman Turkey in its long history. Haji Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmar, by contrast, enjoys a local reputation as a scholar in the Malay-Indonesian region but is unknown outside of that area. Methodology: This research is based on a comparative analysis of the exegesis of both scholars on Sūra al-Fātiḥa, exploring the techniques they used to reach ordinary Muslims with their exegesis, not just highly educated Muslims. Findings: Said Nursi and Muḥammad Saʿīd bin ʿUmar came from quite different backgrounds and contexts. Moreover, their exegetical styles were fundamentally different, with the former’s being more thematic and the latter’s being more literalist. Nevertheless, each succeeded in producing exegesis that reached the masses, thereby meeting their overall goals of reinforcing the commitment to faith and dynamic spirit of Muslims in their respective contexts. Originality: This research is original in various ways. First, comparative studies of Said Nursi and Malay-language exegetes are few in number. Second, the identification of similarities in the results of studies on exegesis despite the use of different methods requires greater scholarly attention. This article should stimulate interest in further studies on the matter.
topic Tafsīr
Said Nursi
Sūrah al-Fātiḥa
Malay-Indonesian
Risale-I Nur
url https://185.37.108.12/index.php/sharia/article/view/1731
work_keys_str_mv AT bytrrydl exegetingsuraalfatihaforthemassesbediuzzamansaidnursiandhajimuhammadsaʿidbinʿumar
_version_ 1717779694443560960