Prevalence and risk factors of postoperative delirium after spinal surgery: a meta-analysis

• Main Authors: Hua Gao, Hui-Juan Ma, Ying-Jia Li, Ci Yin, Zheng Li
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2020-04-01
• Series: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
• Subjects: Delirium; Prevalence, Risk factor; Spinal surgery; Meta-analysis
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-020-01651-4

Abstract Objective Postoperative delirium (POD) was common after spinal surgery, but the main findings in previous studies remained conflicting. This current meta-analysis was aimed at exploring the prevalence and risk factors of POD after spinal surgery. Methods PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to June 2019. Studies which reported the prevalence and risk factors of POD after spinal surgery were included. STATA version 12.0 was employed to analyze the pooled data. Statistical heterogeneity across included studies was identified using the I 2 statistics. Results A total of 28 studies with 588,732 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of POD after spinal surgery was 0.85% (95%CI, 0.83–0.88%) with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 97.3%). The central nervous system disorder (OR 4.73; 95%CI, 4.30–5.19) was a strong predictor for POD, whereas age (OR 1.16; 95%CI, 1.05–2.47; I 2 = 99.2%) and blood loss (OR 1.10; 95%CI, 1.01–1.20; I 2 = 93.3%) were weaker predictors. The funnel plot and statistical tests suggested that there existed potential publication bias, but the trim and fill method indicated that the pooled prevalence basically kept stable after adding two “missing” studies. Conclusions The pooled POD after spinal surgery ranges from 0.83 to 0.88%. The central nervous system disorder, age, and blood loss were potential risk factors for POD.