Mumps Postexposure Prophylaxis with a Third Dose of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Orange County, New York, USA
Although the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is not recommended for mumps postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), data on its effectiveness are limited. During the 2009–2010 mumps outbreak in the northeastern United States, we assessed effectiveness of PEP with a third dose of MMR vaccine among contacts...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2013-09-01
|
Series: | Emerging Infectious Diseases |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/19/9/13-0299_article |
id |
doaj-2bdc35d38379464d928e8c8df60ac975 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2bdc35d38379464d928e8c8df60ac9752020-11-25T01:49:06ZengCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-60592013-09-011991411141710.3201/eid1909.130299Mumps Postexposure Prophylaxis with a Third Dose of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Orange County, New York, USAAmy Parker FiebelkornJacqueline LawlerAaron T. CurnsChristina BrandeburgGregory S. WallaceAlthough the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is not recommended for mumps postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), data on its effectiveness are limited. During the 2009–2010 mumps outbreak in the northeastern United States, we assessed effectiveness of PEP with a third dose of MMR vaccine among contacts in Orthodox Jewish households who were given a third dose within 5 days of mumps onset in the household’s index patient. We compared mumps attack rates between persons who received a third MMR dose during the first incubation period after onset in the index patient and 2-dose vaccinated persons who had not. Twenty-eight (11.7%) of 239 eligible household members received a third MMR dose as PEP. Mumps attack rates were 0% among third-dose recipients versus 5.2% among 2-dose recipients without PEP (p = 0.57). Although a third MMR dose administered as PEP did not have a significant effect, it may offer some benefits in specific outbreak contexts.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/19/9/13-0299_articlemumpspostexposure prophylaxisthird-dose MMR vaccine interventionmeasles-mumps-rubella vaccinevirusesNew York |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amy Parker Fiebelkorn Jacqueline Lawler Aaron T. Curns Christina Brandeburg Gregory S. Wallace |
spellingShingle |
Amy Parker Fiebelkorn Jacqueline Lawler Aaron T. Curns Christina Brandeburg Gregory S. Wallace Mumps Postexposure Prophylaxis with a Third Dose of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Orange County, New York, USA Emerging Infectious Diseases mumps postexposure prophylaxis third-dose MMR vaccine intervention measles-mumps-rubella vaccine viruses New York |
author_facet |
Amy Parker Fiebelkorn Jacqueline Lawler Aaron T. Curns Christina Brandeburg Gregory S. Wallace |
author_sort |
Amy Parker Fiebelkorn |
title |
Mumps Postexposure Prophylaxis with a Third Dose of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Orange County, New York, USA |
title_short |
Mumps Postexposure Prophylaxis with a Third Dose of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Orange County, New York, USA |
title_full |
Mumps Postexposure Prophylaxis with a Third Dose of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Orange County, New York, USA |
title_fullStr |
Mumps Postexposure Prophylaxis with a Third Dose of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Orange County, New York, USA |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mumps Postexposure Prophylaxis with a Third Dose of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Orange County, New York, USA |
title_sort |
mumps postexposure prophylaxis with a third dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, orange county, new york, usa |
publisher |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
series |
Emerging Infectious Diseases |
issn |
1080-6040 1080-6059 |
publishDate |
2013-09-01 |
description |
Although the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is not recommended for mumps postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), data on its effectiveness are limited. During the 2009–2010 mumps outbreak in the northeastern United States, we assessed effectiveness of PEP with a third dose of MMR vaccine among contacts in Orthodox Jewish households who were given a third dose within 5 days of mumps onset in the household’s index patient. We compared mumps attack rates between persons who received a third MMR dose during the first incubation period after onset in the index patient and 2-dose vaccinated persons who had not. Twenty-eight (11.7%) of 239 eligible household members received a third MMR dose as PEP. Mumps attack rates were 0% among third-dose recipients versus 5.2% among 2-dose recipients without PEP (p = 0.57). Although a third MMR dose administered as PEP did not have a significant effect, it may offer some benefits in specific outbreak contexts. |
topic |
mumps postexposure prophylaxis third-dose MMR vaccine intervention measles-mumps-rubella vaccine viruses New York |
url |
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/19/9/13-0299_article |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amyparkerfiebelkorn mumpspostexposureprophylaxiswithathirddoseofmeaslesmumpsrubellavaccineorangecountynewyorkusa AT jacquelinelawler mumpspostexposureprophylaxiswithathirddoseofmeaslesmumpsrubellavaccineorangecountynewyorkusa AT aarontcurns mumpspostexposureprophylaxiswithathirddoseofmeaslesmumpsrubellavaccineorangecountynewyorkusa AT christinabrandeburg mumpspostexposureprophylaxiswithathirddoseofmeaslesmumpsrubellavaccineorangecountynewyorkusa AT gregoryswallace mumpspostexposureprophylaxiswithathirddoseofmeaslesmumpsrubellavaccineorangecountynewyorkusa |
_version_ |
1725009000134606848 |