Jakość pracy naukowej, jej potwierdzenie a recenzja partnerska. Odbiór w środowisku naukowym i nieporozumienia. Postawy wobec recenzji partnerskiej (przekł. Tomasz Olszewski)
Barnes J., Proof and the syllogism, w:Aristotle on Science: The „Posterior Analytics”,red. E. Berti, 1981.<br /><br />Lerner E., Fraud shows peer-review flaw, „The Industrialist Physicist” 8(6), 2003.<br /><br />Mulligan Adrian (Elsevier), Quality, certification and peer revi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan
2009-01-01
|
| Series: | Biblioteka |
| Online Access: | http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/b/article/view/200 |
| Summary: | Barnes J., Proof and the syllogism, w:Aristotle on Science: The „Posterior Analytics”,red. E. Berti, 1981.<br /><br />Lerner E., Fraud shows peer-review flaw, „The Industrialist Physicist” 8(6), 2003.<br /><br />Mulligan Adrian (Elsevier), Quality, certification and peer review, Information Services and Use, 28 (2008).<br /><br />Olson C.M., Peer review of the biomedical literature, „American Journal of Emergency Medicine” 8(4), 1990.<br /><br />Ziman J.M., Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Development of Science, London 1968.<br /><br />Zuckerman H., Merton R.K., Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system, „Minerva” 9(1), 1971. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1506-3615 2391-5838 |