Reconciling Quality by Design and Transdermal Product Development

Since my first exposure to the acronym ‘QbD’ more than ten years ago, I have been trying to understand exactly what QbD is and how I might incorporate its teachings into my twenty-odd years of experience developing transdermal systems. I feel I have made little progress since the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kenneth Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Pharmaceutics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/12/3/273
id doaj-2bf80b2074e34256861f9a8e9232617f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2bf80b2074e34256861f9a8e9232617f2020-11-25T03:12:36ZengMDPI AGPharmaceutics1999-49232020-03-0112327310.3390/pharmaceutics12030273pharmaceutics12030273Reconciling Quality by Design and Transdermal Product DevelopmentKenneth Miller0ISYN Consulting LLC, Melrose, FL 32666, USASince my first exposure to the acronym ‘QbD’ more than ten years ago, I have been trying to understand exactly what QbD is and how I might incorporate its teachings into my twenty-odd years of experience developing transdermal systems. I feel I have made little progress since then. Eventually, I came to realize that while QbD has its merits, it is not a guide for (transdermal) product development, despite so often being described as such. Instead, I have come to consider QbD as a language useful for organizing and presenting the array of data supporting the approval of a new product, but it still leaves the experimental approach entirely up to the developer. What QbD does provide to the development community is a means of conveying product information through a consistent framework facilitating both internal and regulatory review. As a result, new ‘QbD’ product applications tend to be more uniform and complete than the applications that preceded the initiative.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/12/3/273quality by designtransdermal product development
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kenneth Miller
spellingShingle Kenneth Miller
Reconciling Quality by Design and Transdermal Product Development
Pharmaceutics
quality by design
transdermal product development
author_facet Kenneth Miller
author_sort Kenneth Miller
title Reconciling Quality by Design and Transdermal Product Development
title_short Reconciling Quality by Design and Transdermal Product Development
title_full Reconciling Quality by Design and Transdermal Product Development
title_fullStr Reconciling Quality by Design and Transdermal Product Development
title_full_unstemmed Reconciling Quality by Design and Transdermal Product Development
title_sort reconciling quality by design and transdermal product development
publisher MDPI AG
series Pharmaceutics
issn 1999-4923
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Since my first exposure to the acronym ‘QbD’ more than ten years ago, I have been trying to understand exactly what QbD is and how I might incorporate its teachings into my twenty-odd years of experience developing transdermal systems. I feel I have made little progress since then. Eventually, I came to realize that while QbD has its merits, it is not a guide for (transdermal) product development, despite so often being described as such. Instead, I have come to consider QbD as a language useful for organizing and presenting the array of data supporting the approval of a new product, but it still leaves the experimental approach entirely up to the developer. What QbD does provide to the development community is a means of conveying product information through a consistent framework facilitating both internal and regulatory review. As a result, new ‘QbD’ product applications tend to be more uniform and complete than the applications that preceded the initiative.
topic quality by design
transdermal product development
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/12/3/273
work_keys_str_mv AT kennethmiller reconcilingqualitybydesignandtransdermalproductdevelopment
_version_ 1724649649993678848