Cutaneous reactions due to antihypertensive drugs

Out of a total of 1147 patients on antihypertensive drugs, 23 (2.04%) developed adverse cutaneous drug reactions (ACDR). The commonest antihypertensive drug group causing ACDR was beta-blockers of which atenolol was the commonest culprit. The second most common group was calcium channel b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Upadhayai J, Nangia Anup, Mukhija R, Misra Mukum, Mohan Lalit, Singh K
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2006-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dermatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2006;volume=51;issue=3;spage=189;epage=191;aulast=Upadhayai
id doaj-2bfeb0eaf0384f22b54214dbcde17ce3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2bfeb0eaf0384f22b54214dbcde17ce32020-11-24T23:46:57ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dermatology0019-51542006-01-01513189191Cutaneous reactions due to antihypertensive drugsUpadhayai JNangia AnupMukhija RMisra MukumMohan LalitSingh KOut of a total of 1147 patients on antihypertensive drugs, 23 (2.04%) developed adverse cutaneous drug reactions (ACDR). The commonest antihypertensive drug group causing ACDR was beta-blockers of which atenolol was the commonest culprit. The second most common group was calcium channel blockers with amlodipine as the commonest offender. The most common patterns of ACDR observed included urticaria followed by lichenoid drug eruption (LDE). We noted 2 new patterns of reactions; (i) one patient developed brownish blue pigmentation of nails while on atenolol for 3 years, which resolved in 4 months after withdrawal and (ii) another patient on amlodipine for 8 years developed Schamberg′s like purpuric pigmentation, which resolved on withdrawal of drug within 3 months. These findings have not been reported in the literature earlier. This study is presented for paucity of Indian data on ACDR due to antihypertensive drugs, and remarkable advancement in area of cardiovascular and antihypertensive pharmacology and a large number of population taking antihypertensive drugs.http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2006;volume=51;issue=3;spage=189;epage=191;aulast=UpadhayaiAdverse cutaneous drug reactionlichenoid drug eruptionantihypertensive drugs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Upadhayai J
Nangia Anup
Mukhija R
Misra Mukum
Mohan Lalit
Singh K
spellingShingle Upadhayai J
Nangia Anup
Mukhija R
Misra Mukum
Mohan Lalit
Singh K
Cutaneous reactions due to antihypertensive drugs
Indian Journal of Dermatology
Adverse cutaneous drug reaction
lichenoid drug eruption
antihypertensive drugs
author_facet Upadhayai J
Nangia Anup
Mukhija R
Misra Mukum
Mohan Lalit
Singh K
author_sort Upadhayai J
title Cutaneous reactions due to antihypertensive drugs
title_short Cutaneous reactions due to antihypertensive drugs
title_full Cutaneous reactions due to antihypertensive drugs
title_fullStr Cutaneous reactions due to antihypertensive drugs
title_full_unstemmed Cutaneous reactions due to antihypertensive drugs
title_sort cutaneous reactions due to antihypertensive drugs
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dermatology
issn 0019-5154
publishDate 2006-01-01
description Out of a total of 1147 patients on antihypertensive drugs, 23 (2.04%) developed adverse cutaneous drug reactions (ACDR). The commonest antihypertensive drug group causing ACDR was beta-blockers of which atenolol was the commonest culprit. The second most common group was calcium channel blockers with amlodipine as the commonest offender. The most common patterns of ACDR observed included urticaria followed by lichenoid drug eruption (LDE). We noted 2 new patterns of reactions; (i) one patient developed brownish blue pigmentation of nails while on atenolol for 3 years, which resolved in 4 months after withdrawal and (ii) another patient on amlodipine for 8 years developed Schamberg′s like purpuric pigmentation, which resolved on withdrawal of drug within 3 months. These findings have not been reported in the literature earlier. This study is presented for paucity of Indian data on ACDR due to antihypertensive drugs, and remarkable advancement in area of cardiovascular and antihypertensive pharmacology and a large number of population taking antihypertensive drugs.
topic Adverse cutaneous drug reaction
lichenoid drug eruption
antihypertensive drugs
url http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2006;volume=51;issue=3;spage=189;epage=191;aulast=Upadhayai
work_keys_str_mv AT upadhayaij cutaneousreactionsduetoantihypertensivedrugs
AT nangiaanup cutaneousreactionsduetoantihypertensivedrugs
AT mukhijar cutaneousreactionsduetoantihypertensivedrugs
AT misramukum cutaneousreactionsduetoantihypertensivedrugs
AT mohanlalit cutaneousreactionsduetoantihypertensivedrugs
AT singhk cutaneousreactionsduetoantihypertensivedrugs
_version_ 1725491455019974656