A Comparison of Three Soft Computing Techniques, Bayesian Regression, Support Vector Regression, and Wavelet Regression, for Monthly Rainfall Forecast

Rainfall, being one of the most important components of the hydrological cycle, plays an extremely important role in agriculture-based economies like India. This paper presents a comparison between three soft computing techniques, namely Bayesian regression (BR), support vector regression (SVR), and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sharma Ashutosh, Goyal Manish Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of Intelligent Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2016-0065
id doaj-2c2380df16f742bda0d504f84d9ba54f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c2380df16f742bda0d504f84d9ba54f2021-09-06T19:40:37ZengDe GruyterJournal of Intelligent Systems0334-18602191-026X2017-09-0126464165510.1515/jisys-2016-0065A Comparison of Three Soft Computing Techniques, Bayesian Regression, Support Vector Regression, and Wavelet Regression, for Monthly Rainfall ForecastSharma Ashutosh0Goyal Manish Kumar1Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati 781039, IndiaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati 781039, India, Tel.: +91 361 258 3328Rainfall, being one of the most important components of the hydrological cycle, plays an extremely important role in agriculture-based economies like India. This paper presents a comparison between three soft computing techniques, namely Bayesian regression (BR), support vector regression (SVR), and wavelet regression (WR), for monthly rainfall forecast in Assam, India. A WR model is a combination of discrete wavelet transform and linear regression. Monthly rainfall data for 102 years from 1901 to 2002 at 21 stations were used for this study. The performances of different models were evaluated based on the mean absolute error, root mean square error, correlation coefficient, and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient. Based on model statistics, WR was found to be the most accurate followed by SVR and BR. The efficiencies for the BR, SVR, and WR models were found to be 32.8%, 52.9%, and 64.03%, respectively. From the spatial analysis of model performances, it was found that the models performed best for the upper Assam region followed by lower, southern, and middle regions, respectively.https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2016-0065rainfall predictionsupport vector regressionwavelet regressionbayesian regression
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sharma Ashutosh
Goyal Manish Kumar
spellingShingle Sharma Ashutosh
Goyal Manish Kumar
A Comparison of Three Soft Computing Techniques, Bayesian Regression, Support Vector Regression, and Wavelet Regression, for Monthly Rainfall Forecast
Journal of Intelligent Systems
rainfall prediction
support vector regression
wavelet regression
bayesian regression
author_facet Sharma Ashutosh
Goyal Manish Kumar
author_sort Sharma Ashutosh
title A Comparison of Three Soft Computing Techniques, Bayesian Regression, Support Vector Regression, and Wavelet Regression, for Monthly Rainfall Forecast
title_short A Comparison of Three Soft Computing Techniques, Bayesian Regression, Support Vector Regression, and Wavelet Regression, for Monthly Rainfall Forecast
title_full A Comparison of Three Soft Computing Techniques, Bayesian Regression, Support Vector Regression, and Wavelet Regression, for Monthly Rainfall Forecast
title_fullStr A Comparison of Three Soft Computing Techniques, Bayesian Regression, Support Vector Regression, and Wavelet Regression, for Monthly Rainfall Forecast
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Three Soft Computing Techniques, Bayesian Regression, Support Vector Regression, and Wavelet Regression, for Monthly Rainfall Forecast
title_sort comparison of three soft computing techniques, bayesian regression, support vector regression, and wavelet regression, for monthly rainfall forecast
publisher De Gruyter
series Journal of Intelligent Systems
issn 0334-1860
2191-026X
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Rainfall, being one of the most important components of the hydrological cycle, plays an extremely important role in agriculture-based economies like India. This paper presents a comparison between three soft computing techniques, namely Bayesian regression (BR), support vector regression (SVR), and wavelet regression (WR), for monthly rainfall forecast in Assam, India. A WR model is a combination of discrete wavelet transform and linear regression. Monthly rainfall data for 102 years from 1901 to 2002 at 21 stations were used for this study. The performances of different models were evaluated based on the mean absolute error, root mean square error, correlation coefficient, and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient. Based on model statistics, WR was found to be the most accurate followed by SVR and BR. The efficiencies for the BR, SVR, and WR models were found to be 32.8%, 52.9%, and 64.03%, respectively. From the spatial analysis of model performances, it was found that the models performed best for the upper Assam region followed by lower, southern, and middle regions, respectively.
topic rainfall prediction
support vector regression
wavelet regression
bayesian regression
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2016-0065
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaashutosh acomparisonofthreesoftcomputingtechniquesbayesianregressionsupportvectorregressionandwaveletregressionformonthlyrainfallforecast
AT goyalmanishkumar acomparisonofthreesoftcomputingtechniquesbayesianregressionsupportvectorregressionandwaveletregressionformonthlyrainfallforecast
AT sharmaashutosh comparisonofthreesoftcomputingtechniquesbayesianregressionsupportvectorregressionandwaveletregressionformonthlyrainfallforecast
AT goyalmanishkumar comparisonofthreesoftcomputingtechniquesbayesianregressionsupportvectorregressionandwaveletregressionformonthlyrainfallforecast
_version_ 1717768108082462720