System Architecture for 3D Gravity Modelling

<div>A flexible software architecture for gravity modelling is established</div><div>and the advantage is discussed of having several alternative programs tohandle complex 3D models. The flexible architecture consists of four parts, implemented in a distributed computer environment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Franjo A. Šumanovac, Ipo L. Ritsema, Bert H. Bril
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Croatian Geological Survey 2010-11-01
Series:Geologia Croatica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.geologia-croatica.hr/ojs/index.php/GC/article/view/345
id doaj-2c260ab8120c44e3b917588861bc37e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c260ab8120c44e3b917588861bc37e62020-11-25T00:33:03ZengCroatian Geological SurveyGeologia Croatica1330-030X1333-48752010-11-0149214515310.4154/GC.1996.03249System Architecture for 3D Gravity ModellingFranjo A. Šumanovac0Ipo L. Ritsema1Bert H. Bril2Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum EngineeringTNO Institut of Applied GeoscienceTNO Institut of Applied Geoscience<div>A flexible software architecture for gravity modelling is established</div><div>and the advantage is discussed of having several alternative programs tohandle complex 3D models. The flexible architecture consists of four parts, implemented in a distributed computer environment:</div><div>the three-dimensional model builders and visualizers (GOCAD</div><div>software, version 7.0), the model representation translators (GOCAD</div><div>software or GEOMOD sofware), the forward simulation algorithms</div><div>of gravimetric data (alpplying Talwani-Ewing and Goetze- Lahmeyer</div><div>methods in the finite-element representation class), and the inversion</div><div>(model updating) scheme manager based on the Cordell - Henderson</div><div>inversion procedure.</div><div>A good software architecture should at least keep the model building and updating software separate from the forward simulation software. Inversion schemes can then be realized by communication between the two parts of software.</div><div>Several synthetic cascs are shown to demonstrate the use and the</div><div>capability of the architecture and methods applied. The gravity fields</div><div>of complex 3D models, i.e. overhanging and non-overhanging salt</div><div>domes, are simulated. The gravimetric anomalies for both cases have</div><div>very similar shapes. Gravity modelling can distinguish between these,</div><div>because the existing mass differences result in anomaly differences</div><div>both for surface profiles and X-sections. The capability of the inversion</div><div>procedure is also shown in the discussed synthetic case. The inversion manager is able to create the global structural forms represented</div><div>as a horizon with constant density contrast (a two-layer model) from residual gravity anomalies.</div>http://www.geologia-croatica.hr/ojs/index.php/GC/article/view/345Gravity modellingComplex modelsSoftware architecture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Franjo A. Šumanovac
Ipo L. Ritsema
Bert H. Bril
spellingShingle Franjo A. Šumanovac
Ipo L. Ritsema
Bert H. Bril
System Architecture for 3D Gravity Modelling
Geologia Croatica
Gravity modelling
Complex models
Software architecture
author_facet Franjo A. Šumanovac
Ipo L. Ritsema
Bert H. Bril
author_sort Franjo A. Šumanovac
title System Architecture for 3D Gravity Modelling
title_short System Architecture for 3D Gravity Modelling
title_full System Architecture for 3D Gravity Modelling
title_fullStr System Architecture for 3D Gravity Modelling
title_full_unstemmed System Architecture for 3D Gravity Modelling
title_sort system architecture for 3d gravity modelling
publisher Croatian Geological Survey
series Geologia Croatica
issn 1330-030X
1333-4875
publishDate 2010-11-01
description <div>A flexible software architecture for gravity modelling is established</div><div>and the advantage is discussed of having several alternative programs tohandle complex 3D models. The flexible architecture consists of four parts, implemented in a distributed computer environment:</div><div>the three-dimensional model builders and visualizers (GOCAD</div><div>software, version 7.0), the model representation translators (GOCAD</div><div>software or GEOMOD sofware), the forward simulation algorithms</div><div>of gravimetric data (alpplying Talwani-Ewing and Goetze- Lahmeyer</div><div>methods in the finite-element representation class), and the inversion</div><div>(model updating) scheme manager based on the Cordell - Henderson</div><div>inversion procedure.</div><div>A good software architecture should at least keep the model building and updating software separate from the forward simulation software. Inversion schemes can then be realized by communication between the two parts of software.</div><div>Several synthetic cascs are shown to demonstrate the use and the</div><div>capability of the architecture and methods applied. The gravity fields</div><div>of complex 3D models, i.e. overhanging and non-overhanging salt</div><div>domes, are simulated. The gravimetric anomalies for both cases have</div><div>very similar shapes. Gravity modelling can distinguish between these,</div><div>because the existing mass differences result in anomaly differences</div><div>both for surface profiles and X-sections. The capability of the inversion</div><div>procedure is also shown in the discussed synthetic case. The inversion manager is able to create the global structural forms represented</div><div>as a horizon with constant density contrast (a two-layer model) from residual gravity anomalies.</div>
topic Gravity modelling
Complex models
Software architecture
url http://www.geologia-croatica.hr/ojs/index.php/GC/article/view/345
work_keys_str_mv AT franjoasumanovac systemarchitecturefor3dgravitymodelling
AT ipolritsema systemarchitecturefor3dgravitymodelling
AT berthbril systemarchitecturefor3dgravitymodelling
_version_ 1725317476663689216