Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques

Cylindricity is a kind of three-dimensional form distortion of a cylinder. An accurate in situ measurement of cylindricity is relatively complex because measuring and reconstructing cylindrical profile and evaluating out-of-cylindricity should be involved. Any method of in situ measuring cylindricit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wenwen Liu, Penghao Hu, Kuangchao Fan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-10-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/10/1946
id doaj-2c344a73da364f8c94e9d9449154b33b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c344a73da364f8c94e9d9449154b33b2020-11-25T01:27:04ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172018-10-01810194610.3390/app8101946app8101946Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation TechniquesWenwen Liu0Penghao Hu1Kuangchao Fan2School of Instrument Science and Opto-electronic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, ChinaSchool of Instrument Science and Opto-electronic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, ChinaSchool of Instrument Science and Opto-electronic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, ChinaCylindricity is a kind of three-dimensional form distortion of a cylinder. An accurate in situ measurement of cylindricity is relatively complex because measuring and reconstructing cylindrical profile and evaluating out-of-cylindricity should be involved. Any method of in situ measuring cylindricity must solve a common issue, i.e., to eliminate spindle error motions and carriage error motions during measurement and reconstruction. Thus, error separation techniques have played an important role in in situ cylindricity measurement through multipoint detections. Although several valuable five-point methods for in situ measurement of cylindrical profile have been proposed up to present, namely the parallel scan, spiral scan, and V-block scan, there are obvious differences in many aspects, such as the arrangement of probes, error separation model, reconstruction method, adaptability to service environment, accuracy and reliability in practical application, etc. This paper presents the evaluation of their advantages and disadvantages in theory and the actual measurement based on the standard ISO 12180. Suggestions for best meeting the requirements of modern manufacturing and the most prospective one for industrial applications are also given.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/10/1946error separation techniquecylindricityform measurementin situ measurement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wenwen Liu
Penghao Hu
Kuangchao Fan
spellingShingle Wenwen Liu
Penghao Hu
Kuangchao Fan
Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques
Applied Sciences
error separation technique
cylindricity
form measurement
in situ measurement
author_facet Wenwen Liu
Penghao Hu
Kuangchao Fan
author_sort Wenwen Liu
title Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques
title_short Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques
title_full Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques
title_fullStr Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques
title_sort comparison of current five-point cylindricity error separation techniques
publisher MDPI AG
series Applied Sciences
issn 2076-3417
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Cylindricity is a kind of three-dimensional form distortion of a cylinder. An accurate in situ measurement of cylindricity is relatively complex because measuring and reconstructing cylindrical profile and evaluating out-of-cylindricity should be involved. Any method of in situ measuring cylindricity must solve a common issue, i.e., to eliminate spindle error motions and carriage error motions during measurement and reconstruction. Thus, error separation techniques have played an important role in in situ cylindricity measurement through multipoint detections. Although several valuable five-point methods for in situ measurement of cylindrical profile have been proposed up to present, namely the parallel scan, spiral scan, and V-block scan, there are obvious differences in many aspects, such as the arrangement of probes, error separation model, reconstruction method, adaptability to service environment, accuracy and reliability in practical application, etc. This paper presents the evaluation of their advantages and disadvantages in theory and the actual measurement based on the standard ISO 12180. Suggestions for best meeting the requirements of modern manufacturing and the most prospective one for industrial applications are also given.
topic error separation technique
cylindricity
form measurement
in situ measurement
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/10/1946
work_keys_str_mv AT wenwenliu comparisonofcurrentfivepointcylindricityerrorseparationtechniques
AT penghaohu comparisonofcurrentfivepointcylindricityerrorseparationtechniques
AT kuangchaofan comparisonofcurrentfivepointcylindricityerrorseparationtechniques
_version_ 1725107265670742016