Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques
Cylindricity is a kind of three-dimensional form distortion of a cylinder. An accurate in situ measurement of cylindricity is relatively complex because measuring and reconstructing cylindrical profile and evaluating out-of-cylindricity should be involved. Any method of in situ measuring cylindricit...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/10/1946 |
id |
doaj-2c344a73da364f8c94e9d9449154b33b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2c344a73da364f8c94e9d9449154b33b2020-11-25T01:27:04ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172018-10-01810194610.3390/app8101946app8101946Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation TechniquesWenwen Liu0Penghao Hu1Kuangchao Fan2School of Instrument Science and Opto-electronic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, ChinaSchool of Instrument Science and Opto-electronic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, ChinaSchool of Instrument Science and Opto-electronic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, ChinaCylindricity is a kind of three-dimensional form distortion of a cylinder. An accurate in situ measurement of cylindricity is relatively complex because measuring and reconstructing cylindrical profile and evaluating out-of-cylindricity should be involved. Any method of in situ measuring cylindricity must solve a common issue, i.e., to eliminate spindle error motions and carriage error motions during measurement and reconstruction. Thus, error separation techniques have played an important role in in situ cylindricity measurement through multipoint detections. Although several valuable five-point methods for in situ measurement of cylindrical profile have been proposed up to present, namely the parallel scan, spiral scan, and V-block scan, there are obvious differences in many aspects, such as the arrangement of probes, error separation model, reconstruction method, adaptability to service environment, accuracy and reliability in practical application, etc. This paper presents the evaluation of their advantages and disadvantages in theory and the actual measurement based on the standard ISO 12180. Suggestions for best meeting the requirements of modern manufacturing and the most prospective one for industrial applications are also given.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/10/1946error separation techniquecylindricityform measurementin situ measurement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wenwen Liu Penghao Hu Kuangchao Fan |
spellingShingle |
Wenwen Liu Penghao Hu Kuangchao Fan Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques Applied Sciences error separation technique cylindricity form measurement in situ measurement |
author_facet |
Wenwen Liu Penghao Hu Kuangchao Fan |
author_sort |
Wenwen Liu |
title |
Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques |
title_short |
Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques |
title_full |
Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Current Five-Point Cylindricity Error Separation Techniques |
title_sort |
comparison of current five-point cylindricity error separation techniques |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Applied Sciences |
issn |
2076-3417 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
Cylindricity is a kind of three-dimensional form distortion of a cylinder. An accurate in situ measurement of cylindricity is relatively complex because measuring and reconstructing cylindrical profile and evaluating out-of-cylindricity should be involved. Any method of in situ measuring cylindricity must solve a common issue, i.e., to eliminate spindle error motions and carriage error motions during measurement and reconstruction. Thus, error separation techniques have played an important role in in situ cylindricity measurement through multipoint detections. Although several valuable five-point methods for in situ measurement of cylindrical profile have been proposed up to present, namely the parallel scan, spiral scan, and V-block scan, there are obvious differences in many aspects, such as the arrangement of probes, error separation model, reconstruction method, adaptability to service environment, accuracy and reliability in practical application, etc. This paper presents the evaluation of their advantages and disadvantages in theory and the actual measurement based on the standard ISO 12180. Suggestions for best meeting the requirements of modern manufacturing and the most prospective one for industrial applications are also given. |
topic |
error separation technique cylindricity form measurement in situ measurement |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/10/1946 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wenwenliu comparisonofcurrentfivepointcylindricityerrorseparationtechniques AT penghaohu comparisonofcurrentfivepointcylindricityerrorseparationtechniques AT kuangchaofan comparisonofcurrentfivepointcylindricityerrorseparationtechniques |
_version_ |
1725107265670742016 |