Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?

Background: Pre-operative informed consent is an important aspect of surgery, yet there has been no formal training regarding it in Pakistan. This study was done to assess the preoperative informed consent practice. Methods: After taking informed permission, a questionnaire was filled in during an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Jawaid, M Farhan, Z Masood, SMN Husnain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012-09-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/2513
id doaj-2c3d57e44f4347bda8381724e69ba72e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c3d57e44f4347bda8381724e69ba72e2020-12-02T18:34:32ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Public Health2251-60852251-60932012-09-01419Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?M Jawaid0M Farhan1Z Masood2SMN Husnain3 Background: Pre-operative informed consent is an important aspect of surgery, yet there has been no formal training regarding it in Pakistan. This study was done to assess the preoperative informed consent practice. Methods: After taking informed permission, a questionnaire was filled in during an interview with 350 patients, who have undergone elective surgical procedures under routine practice conditions from July to October 2010. All the patients were asked a set of standard questions which related to the information they were provided before the operation as a part of standard informed consent practice. Results: Most i.e. 307 (87.7%) patients were informed about their condition but very few 12 (3.4%) were briefed regarding complications. Only 17 (4.9%) patients said they knew about the risks and complications of proposed anesthesia. One hundred thirty-eight (39.4%) patients said that they were allowed to ask questions while giving consent. Most of the time 196 (56%) consent was taken one day before surgery but in few 2 (0.6%) instances it was taken on the morning of surgery and on operation table in some cases 3 (0.9%) as reported by patients. The consent form was signed by the patients themselves in only 204 (58.3%) cases and by their relatives in the rest. About half the number of patients 171 (48.9%) interviewed were satisfied from the information they received as informed consent process. Conclusion: This study highlights the poor quality of patient knowledge about surgical procedures and the inadequate information provided. https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/2513Informed consentSurgical ethicsOperative risksPakistan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M Jawaid
M Farhan
Z Masood
SMN Husnain
spellingShingle M Jawaid
M Farhan
Z Masood
SMN Husnain
Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
Iranian Journal of Public Health
Informed consent
Surgical ethics
Operative risks
Pakistan
author_facet M Jawaid
M Farhan
Z Masood
SMN Husnain
author_sort M Jawaid
title Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
title_short Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
title_full Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
title_fullStr Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
title_sort preoperative informed consent: is it truly informed?
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Iranian Journal of Public Health
issn 2251-6085
2251-6093
publishDate 2012-09-01
description Background: Pre-operative informed consent is an important aspect of surgery, yet there has been no formal training regarding it in Pakistan. This study was done to assess the preoperative informed consent practice. Methods: After taking informed permission, a questionnaire was filled in during an interview with 350 patients, who have undergone elective surgical procedures under routine practice conditions from July to October 2010. All the patients were asked a set of standard questions which related to the information they were provided before the operation as a part of standard informed consent practice. Results: Most i.e. 307 (87.7%) patients were informed about their condition but very few 12 (3.4%) were briefed regarding complications. Only 17 (4.9%) patients said they knew about the risks and complications of proposed anesthesia. One hundred thirty-eight (39.4%) patients said that they were allowed to ask questions while giving consent. Most of the time 196 (56%) consent was taken one day before surgery but in few 2 (0.6%) instances it was taken on the morning of surgery and on operation table in some cases 3 (0.9%) as reported by patients. The consent form was signed by the patients themselves in only 204 (58.3%) cases and by their relatives in the rest. About half the number of patients 171 (48.9%) interviewed were satisfied from the information they received as informed consent process. Conclusion: This study highlights the poor quality of patient knowledge about surgical procedures and the inadequate information provided.
topic Informed consent
Surgical ethics
Operative risks
Pakistan
url https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/2513
work_keys_str_mv AT mjawaid preoperativeinformedconsentisittrulyinformed
AT mfarhan preoperativeinformedconsentisittrulyinformed
AT zmasood preoperativeinformedconsentisittrulyinformed
AT smnhusnain preoperativeinformedconsentisittrulyinformed
_version_ 1724403798455091200