An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry

Zirconia restorations have been used successfully for years in dentistry owing to their biocompatibility and good mechanical properties. Because of their lack of translucency, zirconia cores are generally veneered with porcelain, which makes restorations weaker due to failure of the adhesion between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Özlem Malkondu, Neslihan Tinastepe, Ender Akan, Ender Kazazoğlu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-07-01
Series:Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1177470
id doaj-2c5aa048567e41efa925705648dd31ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c5aa048567e41efa925705648dd31ec2020-11-25T00:13:25ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBiotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment1310-28181314-35302016-07-0130464465210.1080/13102818.2016.11774701177470An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistryÖzlem Malkondu0Neslihan Tinastepe1Ender Akan2Ender Kazazoğlu3Yeditepe UniversityYeditepe Universityİzmir Katip Çelebi Universityİzmir Katip Çelebi UniversityZirconia restorations have been used successfully for years in dentistry owing to their biocompatibility and good mechanical properties. Because of their lack of translucency, zirconia cores are generally veneered with porcelain, which makes restorations weaker due to failure of the adhesion between the two materials. In recent years, all-ceramic zirconia restorations have been introduced in the dental sector with the intent to solve this problem. Besides the elimination of chipping, the reduced occlusal space requirement seems to be a clear advantage of monolithic zirconia restorations. However, scientific evidence is needed to recommend this relatively new application for clinical use. This mini-review discusses the current scientific literature on monolithic zirconia restorations. The results of in vitro studies suggested that monolithic zirconia may be the best choice for posterior fixed partial dentures in the presence of high occlusal loads and minimal occlusal restoration space. The results should be supported with much more in vitro and particularly in vivo studies to obtain a final conclusion.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1177470Monolithic zirconiafull-contour restorationsall-ceramic zirconia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Özlem Malkondu
Neslihan Tinastepe
Ender Akan
Ender Kazazoğlu
spellingShingle Özlem Malkondu
Neslihan Tinastepe
Ender Akan
Ender Kazazoğlu
An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry
Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
Monolithic zirconia
full-contour restorations
all-ceramic zirconia
author_facet Özlem Malkondu
Neslihan Tinastepe
Ender Akan
Ender Kazazoğlu
author_sort Özlem Malkondu
title An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry
title_short An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry
title_full An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry
title_fullStr An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry
title_full_unstemmed An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry
title_sort overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
issn 1310-2818
1314-3530
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Zirconia restorations have been used successfully for years in dentistry owing to their biocompatibility and good mechanical properties. Because of their lack of translucency, zirconia cores are generally veneered with porcelain, which makes restorations weaker due to failure of the adhesion between the two materials. In recent years, all-ceramic zirconia restorations have been introduced in the dental sector with the intent to solve this problem. Besides the elimination of chipping, the reduced occlusal space requirement seems to be a clear advantage of monolithic zirconia restorations. However, scientific evidence is needed to recommend this relatively new application for clinical use. This mini-review discusses the current scientific literature on monolithic zirconia restorations. The results of in vitro studies suggested that monolithic zirconia may be the best choice for posterior fixed partial dentures in the presence of high occlusal loads and minimal occlusal restoration space. The results should be supported with much more in vitro and particularly in vivo studies to obtain a final conclusion.
topic Monolithic zirconia
full-contour restorations
all-ceramic zirconia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1177470
work_keys_str_mv AT ozlemmalkondu anoverviewofmonolithiczirconiaindentistry
AT neslihantinastepe anoverviewofmonolithiczirconiaindentistry
AT enderakan anoverviewofmonolithiczirconiaindentistry
AT enderkazazoglu anoverviewofmonolithiczirconiaindentistry
AT ozlemmalkondu overviewofmonolithiczirconiaindentistry
AT neslihantinastepe overviewofmonolithiczirconiaindentistry
AT enderakan overviewofmonolithiczirconiaindentistry
AT enderkazazoglu overviewofmonolithiczirconiaindentistry
_version_ 1725394333891297280