Registration accuracy for MR images of the prostate using a subvolume based registration protocol

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years, there has been a considerable research effort concerning the integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into the external radiotherapy workflow motivated by the superior soft tissue contrast as compared to compu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Söderström Karin, Karlsson Mikael, Garpebring Anders, Brynolfsson Patrik, Jonsson Joakim H, Nyholm Tufve
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-06-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
MRI
Online Access:http://www.ro-journal.com/content/6/1/73
id doaj-2c626c2033c94c4890cdbbcb36f1a04d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c626c2033c94c4890cdbbcb36f1a04d2020-11-25T01:56:59ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2011-06-01617310.1186/1748-717X-6-73Registration accuracy for MR images of the prostate using a subvolume based registration protocolSöderström KarinKarlsson MikaelGarpebring AndersBrynolfsson PatrikJonsson Joakim HNyholm Tufve<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years, there has been a considerable research effort concerning the integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into the external radiotherapy workflow motivated by the superior soft tissue contrast as compared to computed tomography. Image registration is a necessary step in many applications, e.g. in patient positioning and therapy response assessment with repeated imaging. In this study, we investigate the dependence between the registration accuracy and the size of the registration volume for a subvolume based rigid registration protocol for MR images of the prostate.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Ten patients were imaged four times each over the course of radiotherapy treatment using a T2 weighted sequence. The images were registered to each other using a mean square distance metric and a step gradient optimizer for registration volumes of different sizes. The precision of the registrations was evaluated using the center of mass distance between the manually defined prostates in the registered images. The optimal size of the registration volume was determined by minimizing the standard deviation of these distances.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We found that prostate position was most uncertain in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction using traditional full volume registration. The improvement in standard deviation of the mean center of mass distance between the prostate volumes using a registration volume optimized to the prostate was 3.9 mm (p < 0.001) in the AP direction. The optimum registration volume size was 0 mm margin added to the prostate gland as outlined in the first image series.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Repeated MR imaging of the prostate for therapy set-up or therapy assessment will both require high precision tissue registration. With a subvolume based registration the prostate registration uncertainty can be reduced down to the order of 1 mm (1 SD) compared to several millimeters for registration based on the whole pelvis.</p> http://www.ro-journal.com/content/6/1/73MRIimage registrationprostateradiotherapysubvolumelocalizedcancer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Söderström Karin
Karlsson Mikael
Garpebring Anders
Brynolfsson Patrik
Jonsson Joakim H
Nyholm Tufve
spellingShingle Söderström Karin
Karlsson Mikael
Garpebring Anders
Brynolfsson Patrik
Jonsson Joakim H
Nyholm Tufve
Registration accuracy for MR images of the prostate using a subvolume based registration protocol
Radiation Oncology
MRI
image registration
prostate
radiotherapy
subvolume
localized
cancer
author_facet Söderström Karin
Karlsson Mikael
Garpebring Anders
Brynolfsson Patrik
Jonsson Joakim H
Nyholm Tufve
author_sort Söderström Karin
title Registration accuracy for MR images of the prostate using a subvolume based registration protocol
title_short Registration accuracy for MR images of the prostate using a subvolume based registration protocol
title_full Registration accuracy for MR images of the prostate using a subvolume based registration protocol
title_fullStr Registration accuracy for MR images of the prostate using a subvolume based registration protocol
title_full_unstemmed Registration accuracy for MR images of the prostate using a subvolume based registration protocol
title_sort registration accuracy for mr images of the prostate using a subvolume based registration protocol
publisher BMC
series Radiation Oncology
issn 1748-717X
publishDate 2011-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years, there has been a considerable research effort concerning the integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into the external radiotherapy workflow motivated by the superior soft tissue contrast as compared to computed tomography. Image registration is a necessary step in many applications, e.g. in patient positioning and therapy response assessment with repeated imaging. In this study, we investigate the dependence between the registration accuracy and the size of the registration volume for a subvolume based rigid registration protocol for MR images of the prostate.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Ten patients were imaged four times each over the course of radiotherapy treatment using a T2 weighted sequence. The images were registered to each other using a mean square distance metric and a step gradient optimizer for registration volumes of different sizes. The precision of the registrations was evaluated using the center of mass distance between the manually defined prostates in the registered images. The optimal size of the registration volume was determined by minimizing the standard deviation of these distances.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We found that prostate position was most uncertain in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction using traditional full volume registration. The improvement in standard deviation of the mean center of mass distance between the prostate volumes using a registration volume optimized to the prostate was 3.9 mm (p < 0.001) in the AP direction. The optimum registration volume size was 0 mm margin added to the prostate gland as outlined in the first image series.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Repeated MR imaging of the prostate for therapy set-up or therapy assessment will both require high precision tissue registration. With a subvolume based registration the prostate registration uncertainty can be reduced down to the order of 1 mm (1 SD) compared to several millimeters for registration based on the whole pelvis.</p>
topic MRI
image registration
prostate
radiotherapy
subvolume
localized
cancer
url http://www.ro-journal.com/content/6/1/73
work_keys_str_mv AT soderstromkarin registrationaccuracyformrimagesoftheprostateusingasubvolumebasedregistrationprotocol
AT karlssonmikael registrationaccuracyformrimagesoftheprostateusingasubvolumebasedregistrationprotocol
AT garpebringanders registrationaccuracyformrimagesoftheprostateusingasubvolumebasedregistrationprotocol
AT brynolfssonpatrik registrationaccuracyformrimagesoftheprostateusingasubvolumebasedregistrationprotocol
AT jonssonjoakimh registrationaccuracyformrimagesoftheprostateusingasubvolumebasedregistrationprotocol
AT nyholmtufve registrationaccuracyformrimagesoftheprostateusingasubvolumebasedregistrationprotocol
_version_ 1724977116431253504