Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
Publishers’ policies have the capability to increase transparency in scholarly literature. Malički and colleagues carried out a systematic review of over 150 studies that have examined scholarly journals’ recommendations. They find that requirements in terms of authorship, conflict of interests, dat...
Main Authors: | Mario Malički, Ana Jerončić, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Lex Bouter, Gerben ter Riet |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Nature Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26027-y |
Similar Items
-
Journals' instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines.
by: Mario Malički, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal
by: Malički Mario, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01) -
Correction to: ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity
by: Lex M. Bouter, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity
by: Lex M. Bouter, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01) -
Connecting Scientific Articles with Research Data: New Directions in Online Scholarly Publishing
by: IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, et al.
Published: (2013-05-01)