Laparoscopic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: an important link in the process of transition from open to total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

• Main Authors: Feng Tian, Yi-zhi Wang, Su-rong Hua, Qiao-fei Liu, Jun-chao Guo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2020-05-01
• Series: BMC Surgery
• Subjects: Open pancreaticoduodenectomy; Laparoscopic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic fistula; Safety
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12893-020-00752-5

Abstract Background The safety of total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy still remains controversial. Laparoscopic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (LAPD) may be an alternative selection. The purpose of the present study is to compare a consecutive cohort of LAPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) from a single surgeon. Methods A comparison was conducted between LAPD and OPD from January 2013 to December 2018. Perioperative outcomes and short-term oncological results were compared. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine associations among variables. Results 133 patients were enrolled, 36 patients (27.1%) underwent LAPD and 97 (72.9%) underwent OPD. No 30-day and 90-day mortality occurred. LAPD was associated with decreased intraoperative estimated blood loss (300 versus 500 ml; P = 0.002), longer operative time (372 versus 305 min; P < 0.001) compared with OPD. LAPD had a conversion rate of 16.7%, and wasn’t associated with an increased grade B/C pancreatic fistula rate, major surgical complications, intraoperative blood transfusion, reoperation rate or length of hospital stay after surgery. In the subset of 58 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, R0 resection rate, median total harvested lymph node or lymph nodes ≥12 did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion LAPD could be performed with non-inferior short-term perioperative and oncologic outcomes achieved by OPD in selected patients.