Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate

Biogas plants for waste treatment valorization are presently experiencing rapid development, especially in the agricultural sector, where large amounts of digestate are being generated. In this study, we investigated the effect of vibro-ball milling (VBM) for 5 and 30 min at a frequency of 20 s<s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florian Monlau, Cecilia Sambusiti, Abdellatif Barakat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-09-01
Series:Bioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/6/3/80
id doaj-2c9ac4c49ca9493fbeb04677a29d03bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c9ac4c49ca9493fbeb04677a29d03bb2020-11-25T02:28:18ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542019-09-01638010.3390/bioengineering6030080bioengineering6030080Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic DigestateFlorian Monlau0Cecilia Sambusiti1Abdellatif Barakat2APESA, Pôle Valorisation, Cap Ecologia, Avenue Fréderic Joliot Curie, 64230 Lescar, FranceUMR, IATE, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro, INRA, Université de Montpellier, 34060 Montpellier, FranceUMR, IATE, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro, INRA, Université de Montpellier, 34060 Montpellier, FranceBiogas plants for waste treatment valorization are presently experiencing rapid development, especially in the agricultural sector, where large amounts of digestate are being generated. In this study, we investigated the effect of vibro-ball milling (VBM) for 5 and 30 min at a frequency of 20 s<sup>&#8722;1</sup> on the physicochemical composition and enzymatic hydrolysis (30 U g<sup>&#8722;1</sup> total solids (TS) of cellulase and endo-1,4-xylanase from <i>Trichoderma longibrachiatum</i>) of dry and wet solid separated digestates from an agricultural biogas plant. We found that VBM of dry solid digestate improved the physical parameters as both the particle size and the crystallinity index (from 27% to 75%) were reduced. By contrast, VBM of wet solid digestate had a minimal effect on the physicochemical parameters. The best results in terms of cellulose and hemicelluloses hydrolysis were noted for 30 min of VBM of dry solid digestate, with hydrolysis yields of 64% and 85% for hemicelluloses and cellulose, respectively. At the condition of 30 min of VBM, bioethanol and methane production on the dry solid separated digestate was investigated. Bioethanol fermentation by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation resulted in an ethanol yield of 98 g<sub>eth</sub> kg<sup>&#8722;1</sup> TS (corresponding to 90% of the theoretical value) versus 19 g<sub>eth</sub> kg<sup>&#8722;1</sup> TS for raw solid digestate. Finally, in terms of methane potential, VBM for 30 min lead to an increase of the methane potential of 31% compared to untreated solid digestate.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/6/3/80anaerobic digestionsolid digestatemilling processsugars recoveryenergy balancesbioethanol production
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Florian Monlau
Cecilia Sambusiti
Abdellatif Barakat
spellingShingle Florian Monlau
Cecilia Sambusiti
Abdellatif Barakat
Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
Bioengineering
anaerobic digestion
solid digestate
milling process
sugars recovery
energy balances
bioethanol production
author_facet Florian Monlau
Cecilia Sambusiti
Abdellatif Barakat
author_sort Florian Monlau
title Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
title_short Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
title_full Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
title_fullStr Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
title_sort comparison of dry versus wet milling to improve bioethanol or methane recovery from solid anaerobic digestate
publisher MDPI AG
series Bioengineering
issn 2306-5354
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Biogas plants for waste treatment valorization are presently experiencing rapid development, especially in the agricultural sector, where large amounts of digestate are being generated. In this study, we investigated the effect of vibro-ball milling (VBM) for 5 and 30 min at a frequency of 20 s<sup>&#8722;1</sup> on the physicochemical composition and enzymatic hydrolysis (30 U g<sup>&#8722;1</sup> total solids (TS) of cellulase and endo-1,4-xylanase from <i>Trichoderma longibrachiatum</i>) of dry and wet solid separated digestates from an agricultural biogas plant. We found that VBM of dry solid digestate improved the physical parameters as both the particle size and the crystallinity index (from 27% to 75%) were reduced. By contrast, VBM of wet solid digestate had a minimal effect on the physicochemical parameters. The best results in terms of cellulose and hemicelluloses hydrolysis were noted for 30 min of VBM of dry solid digestate, with hydrolysis yields of 64% and 85% for hemicelluloses and cellulose, respectively. At the condition of 30 min of VBM, bioethanol and methane production on the dry solid separated digestate was investigated. Bioethanol fermentation by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation resulted in an ethanol yield of 98 g<sub>eth</sub> kg<sup>&#8722;1</sup> TS (corresponding to 90% of the theoretical value) versus 19 g<sub>eth</sub> kg<sup>&#8722;1</sup> TS for raw solid digestate. Finally, in terms of methane potential, VBM for 30 min lead to an increase of the methane potential of 31% compared to untreated solid digestate.
topic anaerobic digestion
solid digestate
milling process
sugars recovery
energy balances
bioethanol production
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/6/3/80
work_keys_str_mv AT florianmonlau comparisonofdryversuswetmillingtoimprovebioethanolormethanerecoveryfromsolidanaerobicdigestate
AT ceciliasambusiti comparisonofdryversuswetmillingtoimprovebioethanolormethanerecoveryfromsolidanaerobicdigestate
AT abdellatifbarakat comparisonofdryversuswetmillingtoimprovebioethanolormethanerecoveryfromsolidanaerobicdigestate
_version_ 1724839127035150336