Benarkah Kita Murji’ah? Catatan atas Artikel Prof. Dr. Fauzan Saleh

<p>This is a special note on the article written by Fauzan Saleh entitled Kita Masih Murji’ah: Mencari Akar Teologi Pemahaman Umat Islam Indonesia published in Tsaqafah Volume 7, No. 2, October 2009. The author notes that the article could plunge Muslims to the wrong conception. Fauzan begins...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amal Fathullah Zarkasyi
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Universitas Darussalam Gontor 2014-11-01
Series:Tsaqafah
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tsaqafah/article/view/195
id doaj-2cb437b92d0a49c7826ae146d84cf112
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2cb437b92d0a49c7826ae146d84cf1122020-11-25T04:04:10ZaraUniversitas Darussalam GontorTsaqafah1411-03342460-00082014-11-0110241342210.21111/tsaqafah.v10i2.195182Benarkah Kita Murji’ah? Catatan atas Artikel Prof. Dr. Fauzan SalehAmal Fathullah Zarkasyi0Universitas Darussalam (UNIDA) Gontor, Ponorogo<p>This is a special note on the article written by Fauzan Saleh entitled Kita Masih Murji’ah: Mencari Akar Teologi Pemahaman Umat Islam Indonesia published in Tsaqafah Volume 7, No. 2, October 2009. The author notes that the article could plunge Muslims to the wrong conception. Fauzan begins his article on Caliph Uthman’s nepotism when designating Amr bin Ash as governor of Egypt, Mua’wiyah as governor of Sham and Sa’ad bin Abi Waqas as governor of Iraq and Persia. Further this article notes concerning the definition of Ahl al- Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah. In addition, the author sees Fauzan does not fully understand this concept. Thus, because he classified both Maturidist and Asy’arist only into this group, without explaining their true set of belief. Actually the truth about Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah is the groups who have unanimity in beliefs, traditions and the status of Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) and the the very righteous people among Muslims in Islam. They are the prophet’s companions and Tabi’in (followers), and the schoolars who followed their guidance, and their way in terms of faith, words, and deeds until the Day of Judgment. From this point of view, the criticism persists about the actors a great sin whereby this article parsed differences between Ahlusunah and Murji’ah. According to the author, Fauzan has been on failure when he drew a hasty conclusion at the similarity belief of Murji’ah and Ahlusunah, whereas Ahlusunah’s creed is just a continuation of Murji’ah’s. As clearly written in Fauzan’s conclusions of the article, despite Murji’ah creed is no longer known at this time, but this concept still remains sustainable in Islamic theology.</p>https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tsaqafah/article/view/195murji’ahahl al-sunnah wa al-jamâ’ahtheologycreedbelief
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amal Fathullah Zarkasyi
spellingShingle Amal Fathullah Zarkasyi
Benarkah Kita Murji’ah? Catatan atas Artikel Prof. Dr. Fauzan Saleh
Tsaqafah
murji’ah
ahl al-sunnah wa al-jamâ’ah
theology
creed
belief
author_facet Amal Fathullah Zarkasyi
author_sort Amal Fathullah Zarkasyi
title Benarkah Kita Murji’ah? Catatan atas Artikel Prof. Dr. Fauzan Saleh
title_short Benarkah Kita Murji’ah? Catatan atas Artikel Prof. Dr. Fauzan Saleh
title_full Benarkah Kita Murji’ah? Catatan atas Artikel Prof. Dr. Fauzan Saleh
title_fullStr Benarkah Kita Murji’ah? Catatan atas Artikel Prof. Dr. Fauzan Saleh
title_full_unstemmed Benarkah Kita Murji’ah? Catatan atas Artikel Prof. Dr. Fauzan Saleh
title_sort benarkah kita murji’ah? catatan atas artikel prof. dr. fauzan saleh
publisher Universitas Darussalam Gontor
series Tsaqafah
issn 1411-0334
2460-0008
publishDate 2014-11-01
description <p>This is a special note on the article written by Fauzan Saleh entitled Kita Masih Murji’ah: Mencari Akar Teologi Pemahaman Umat Islam Indonesia published in Tsaqafah Volume 7, No. 2, October 2009. The author notes that the article could plunge Muslims to the wrong conception. Fauzan begins his article on Caliph Uthman’s nepotism when designating Amr bin Ash as governor of Egypt, Mua’wiyah as governor of Sham and Sa’ad bin Abi Waqas as governor of Iraq and Persia. Further this article notes concerning the definition of Ahl al- Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah. In addition, the author sees Fauzan does not fully understand this concept. Thus, because he classified both Maturidist and Asy’arist only into this group, without explaining their true set of belief. Actually the truth about Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah is the groups who have unanimity in beliefs, traditions and the status of Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) and the the very righteous people among Muslims in Islam. They are the prophet’s companions and Tabi’in (followers), and the schoolars who followed their guidance, and their way in terms of faith, words, and deeds until the Day of Judgment. From this point of view, the criticism persists about the actors a great sin whereby this article parsed differences between Ahlusunah and Murji’ah. According to the author, Fauzan has been on failure when he drew a hasty conclusion at the similarity belief of Murji’ah and Ahlusunah, whereas Ahlusunah’s creed is just a continuation of Murji’ah’s. As clearly written in Fauzan’s conclusions of the article, despite Murji’ah creed is no longer known at this time, but this concept still remains sustainable in Islamic theology.</p>
topic murji’ah
ahl al-sunnah wa al-jamâ’ah
theology
creed
belief
url https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tsaqafah/article/view/195
work_keys_str_mv AT amalfathullahzarkasyi benarkahkitamurjiahcatatanatasartikelprofdrfauzansaleh
_version_ 1724437487403663360