Swallow Motor Pattern Is Modulated by Fixed or Stochastic Alterations in Afferent Feedback

Afferent feedback can appreciably alter the pharyngeal phase of swallow. In order to measure the stability of the swallow motor pattern during several types of alterations in afferent feedback, we assessed swallow during a conventional water challenge in four anesthetized cats, and compared that to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suzanne N. King, Tabitha Y. Shen, M. Nicholas Musselwhite, Alyssa Huff, Mitchell D. Reed, Ivan Poliacek, Dena R. Howland, Warren Dixon, Kendall F. Morris, Donald C. Bolser, Kimberly E. Iceman, Teresa Pitts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00112/full
id doaj-2cbe4afcbb3d4affa03647ee7a1762f9
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suzanne N. King
Suzanne N. King
Tabitha Y. Shen
M. Nicholas Musselwhite
Alyssa Huff
Alyssa Huff
Mitchell D. Reed
Mitchell D. Reed
Ivan Poliacek
Ivan Poliacek
Dena R. Howland
Dena R. Howland
Dena R. Howland
Warren Dixon
Kendall F. Morris
Donald C. Bolser
Kimberly E. Iceman
Kimberly E. Iceman
Teresa Pitts
Teresa Pitts
spellingShingle Suzanne N. King
Suzanne N. King
Tabitha Y. Shen
M. Nicholas Musselwhite
Alyssa Huff
Alyssa Huff
Mitchell D. Reed
Mitchell D. Reed
Ivan Poliacek
Ivan Poliacek
Dena R. Howland
Dena R. Howland
Dena R. Howland
Warren Dixon
Kendall F. Morris
Donald C. Bolser
Kimberly E. Iceman
Kimberly E. Iceman
Teresa Pitts
Teresa Pitts
Swallow Motor Pattern Is Modulated by Fixed or Stochastic Alterations in Afferent Feedback
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
deglutition
schluckatmung
diaphragm
facilitation
electrical stimulation
swallow
author_facet Suzanne N. King
Suzanne N. King
Tabitha Y. Shen
M. Nicholas Musselwhite
Alyssa Huff
Alyssa Huff
Mitchell D. Reed
Mitchell D. Reed
Ivan Poliacek
Ivan Poliacek
Dena R. Howland
Dena R. Howland
Dena R. Howland
Warren Dixon
Kendall F. Morris
Donald C. Bolser
Kimberly E. Iceman
Kimberly E. Iceman
Teresa Pitts
Teresa Pitts
author_sort Suzanne N. King
title Swallow Motor Pattern Is Modulated by Fixed or Stochastic Alterations in Afferent Feedback
title_short Swallow Motor Pattern Is Modulated by Fixed or Stochastic Alterations in Afferent Feedback
title_full Swallow Motor Pattern Is Modulated by Fixed or Stochastic Alterations in Afferent Feedback
title_fullStr Swallow Motor Pattern Is Modulated by Fixed or Stochastic Alterations in Afferent Feedback
title_full_unstemmed Swallow Motor Pattern Is Modulated by Fixed or Stochastic Alterations in Afferent Feedback
title_sort swallow motor pattern is modulated by fixed or stochastic alterations in afferent feedback
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Afferent feedback can appreciably alter the pharyngeal phase of swallow. In order to measure the stability of the swallow motor pattern during several types of alterations in afferent feedback, we assessed swallow during a conventional water challenge in four anesthetized cats, and compared that to swallows induced by fixed (20 Hz) and stochastic (1-20Hz) electrical stimulation applied to the superior laryngeal nerve. The swallow motor patterns were evaluated by electromyographic activity (EMG) of eight muscles, based on their functional significance: laryngeal elevators (mylohyoid, geniohyoid, and thyrohyoid); laryngeal adductor (thyroarytenoid); inferior pharyngeal constrictor (thyropharyngeus); upper esophageal sphincter (cricopharyngeus); and inspiratory activity (parasternal and costal diaphragm). Both the fixed and stochastic electrical stimulation paradigms increased activity of the laryngeal elevators, produced short-term facilitation evidenced by increasing swallow durations over the stimulus period, and conversely inhibited swallow-related diaphragm activity. Both the fixed and stochastic stimulus conditions also increased specific EMG amplitudes, which never occurred with the water challenges. Stochastic stimulation increased swallow excitability, as measured by an increase in the number of swallows produced. Consistent with our previous results, changes in the swallow motor pattern for pairs of muscles were only sometimes correlated with each other. We conclude that alterations in afferent feedback produced particular variations of the swallow motor pattern. We hypothesize that specific SLN feedback might modulate the swallow central pattern generator during aberrant feeding conditions (food/liquid entering the airway), which may protect the airway and serve as potentially important clinical diagnostic indicators.
topic deglutition
schluckatmung
diaphragm
facilitation
electrical stimulation
swallow
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00112/full
work_keys_str_mv AT suzannenking swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT suzannenking swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT tabithayshen swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT mnicholasmusselwhite swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT alyssahuff swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT alyssahuff swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT mitchelldreed swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT mitchelldreed swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT ivanpoliacek swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT ivanpoliacek swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT denarhowland swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT denarhowland swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT denarhowland swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT warrendixon swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT kendallfmorris swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT donaldcbolser swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT kimberlyeiceman swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT kimberlyeiceman swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT teresapitts swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
AT teresapitts swallowmotorpatternismodulatedbyfixedorstochasticalterationsinafferentfeedback
_version_ 1724921276419538944
spelling doaj-2cbe4afcbb3d4affa03647ee7a1762f92020-11-25T02:09:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612020-04-011410.3389/fnhum.2020.00112511045Swallow Motor Pattern Is Modulated by Fixed or Stochastic Alterations in Afferent FeedbackSuzanne N. King0Suzanne N. King1Tabitha Y. Shen2M. Nicholas Musselwhite3Alyssa Huff4Alyssa Huff5Mitchell D. Reed6Mitchell D. Reed7Ivan Poliacek8Ivan Poliacek9Dena R. Howland10Dena R. Howland11Dena R. Howland12Warren Dixon13Kendall F. Morris14Donald C. Bolser15Kimberly E. Iceman16Kimberly E. Iceman17Teresa Pitts18Teresa Pitts19Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesDepartment of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesDepartment of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, SlovakiaKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesRobley Rex VA Medical Center, Louisville, KY, United StatesDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United StatesDepartment of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United StatesAfferent feedback can appreciably alter the pharyngeal phase of swallow. In order to measure the stability of the swallow motor pattern during several types of alterations in afferent feedback, we assessed swallow during a conventional water challenge in four anesthetized cats, and compared that to swallows induced by fixed (20 Hz) and stochastic (1-20Hz) electrical stimulation applied to the superior laryngeal nerve. The swallow motor patterns were evaluated by electromyographic activity (EMG) of eight muscles, based on their functional significance: laryngeal elevators (mylohyoid, geniohyoid, and thyrohyoid); laryngeal adductor (thyroarytenoid); inferior pharyngeal constrictor (thyropharyngeus); upper esophageal sphincter (cricopharyngeus); and inspiratory activity (parasternal and costal diaphragm). Both the fixed and stochastic electrical stimulation paradigms increased activity of the laryngeal elevators, produced short-term facilitation evidenced by increasing swallow durations over the stimulus period, and conversely inhibited swallow-related diaphragm activity. Both the fixed and stochastic stimulus conditions also increased specific EMG amplitudes, which never occurred with the water challenges. Stochastic stimulation increased swallow excitability, as measured by an increase in the number of swallows produced. Consistent with our previous results, changes in the swallow motor pattern for pairs of muscles were only sometimes correlated with each other. We conclude that alterations in afferent feedback produced particular variations of the swallow motor pattern. We hypothesize that specific SLN feedback might modulate the swallow central pattern generator during aberrant feeding conditions (food/liquid entering the airway), which may protect the airway and serve as potentially important clinical diagnostic indicators.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00112/fulldeglutitionschluckatmungdiaphragmfacilitationelectrical stimulationswallow