Walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowds

Research in crowd psychology has demonstrated key differences between the behaviour of physical crowds where members are in the same place at the same time, and the collective behaviour of psychological crowds where the entire crowd perceive themselves to be part of the same group through a shared s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Templeton, John Drury, Andrew Philippides
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2018-01-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.180172
id doaj-2cd816d904c3418eb71f6e9b16fa2a93
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2cd816d904c3418eb71f6e9b16fa2a932020-11-25T04:09:48ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032018-01-015710.1098/rsos.180172180172Walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowdsAnne TempletonJohn DruryAndrew PhilippidesResearch in crowd psychology has demonstrated key differences between the behaviour of physical crowds where members are in the same place at the same time, and the collective behaviour of psychological crowds where the entire crowd perceive themselves to be part of the same group through a shared social identity. As yet, no research has investigated the behavioural effects that a shared social identity has on crowd movement at a pedestrian level. To investigate the direction and extent to which social identity influences the movement of crowds, 280 trajectories were tracked as participants walked in one of two conditions: (1) a psychological crowd primed to share a social identity; (2) a naturally occurring physical crowd. Behaviour was compared both within and between the conditions. In comparison to the physical crowd, members of the psychological crowd (i) walked slower, (ii) walked further, and (iii) maintained closer proximity. In addition, pedestrians who had to manoeuvre around the psychological crowd behaved differently to pedestrians who had to manoeuvre past the naturally occurring crowd. We conclude that the behavioural differences between physical and psychological crowds must be taken into account when considering crowd behaviour in event safety management and computer models of crowds.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.180172crowd movementsocial identitypedestrian movementpedestrian modelling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Templeton
John Drury
Andrew Philippides
spellingShingle Anne Templeton
John Drury
Andrew Philippides
Walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowds
Royal Society Open Science
crowd movement
social identity
pedestrian movement
pedestrian modelling
author_facet Anne Templeton
John Drury
Andrew Philippides
author_sort Anne Templeton
title Walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowds
title_short Walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowds
title_full Walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowds
title_fullStr Walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowds
title_full_unstemmed Walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowds
title_sort walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowds
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Research in crowd psychology has demonstrated key differences between the behaviour of physical crowds where members are in the same place at the same time, and the collective behaviour of psychological crowds where the entire crowd perceive themselves to be part of the same group through a shared social identity. As yet, no research has investigated the behavioural effects that a shared social identity has on crowd movement at a pedestrian level. To investigate the direction and extent to which social identity influences the movement of crowds, 280 trajectories were tracked as participants walked in one of two conditions: (1) a psychological crowd primed to share a social identity; (2) a naturally occurring physical crowd. Behaviour was compared both within and between the conditions. In comparison to the physical crowd, members of the psychological crowd (i) walked slower, (ii) walked further, and (iii) maintained closer proximity. In addition, pedestrians who had to manoeuvre around the psychological crowd behaved differently to pedestrians who had to manoeuvre past the naturally occurring crowd. We conclude that the behavioural differences between physical and psychological crowds must be taken into account when considering crowd behaviour in event safety management and computer models of crowds.
topic crowd movement
social identity
pedestrian movement
pedestrian modelling
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.180172
work_keys_str_mv AT annetempleton walkingtogetherbehaviouralsignaturesofpsychologicalcrowds
AT johndrury walkingtogetherbehaviouralsignaturesofpsychologicalcrowds
AT andrewphilippides walkingtogetherbehaviouralsignaturesofpsychologicalcrowds
_version_ 1724421733322063872