National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis

Background: Previous estimates have highlighted a large global burden of stillbirths, with an absence of reliable data from regions where most stillbirths occur. The Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) targets national stillbirth rates (SBRs) of 12 or fewer stillbirths per 1000 births by 2030. We estim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dr. Hannah Blencowe, MRCPCH, Prof. Simon Cousens, DipMathstat, Fiorella Bianchi Jassir, MSc, Lale Say, MD, Doris Chou, MD, Colin Mathers, PhD, Dan Hogan, PhD, Suhail Shiekh, MSc, Zeshan U Qureshi, BM, Danzhen You, PhD, Prof. Joy E Lawn, FRCPCH
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-02-01
Series:The Lancet Global Health
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X15002752
id doaj-2cf2449ab49b49acaa1ba236f989c239
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2cf2449ab49b49acaa1ba236f989c2392020-11-25T02:16:16ZengElsevierThe Lancet Global Health2214-109X2016-02-0142e98e10810.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysisDr. Hannah Blencowe, MRCPCH0Prof. Simon Cousens, DipMathstat1Fiorella Bianchi Jassir, MSc2Lale Say, MD3Doris Chou, MD4Colin Mathers, PhD5Dan Hogan, PhD6Suhail Shiekh, MSc7Zeshan U Qureshi, BM8Danzhen You, PhD9Prof. Joy E Lawn, FRCPCH10Maternal Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH) Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKMaternal Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH) Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKMaternal Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH) Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKWHO, Geneva, SwitzerlandWHO, Geneva, SwitzerlandWHO, Geneva, SwitzerlandWHO, Geneva, SwitzerlandMaternal Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH) Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKUniversity College London, London, UKUNICEF, New York, NY, USAMaternal Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH) Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKBackground: Previous estimates have highlighted a large global burden of stillbirths, with an absence of reliable data from regions where most stillbirths occur. The Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) targets national stillbirth rates (SBRs) of 12 or fewer stillbirths per 1000 births by 2030. We estimate SBRs and numbers for 195 countries, including trends from 2000 to 2015. Methods: We collated SBR data meeting prespecified inclusion criteria from national routine or registration systems, nationally representative surveys, and other data sources identified through a systematic review, web-based searches, and consultation with stillbirth experts. We modelled SBR (≥28 weeks' gestation) for 195 countries with restricted maximum likelihood estimation with country-level random effects. Uncertainty ranges were obtained through a bootstrap approach. Findings: Data from 157 countries (2207 datapoints) met the inclusion criteria, a 90% increase from 2009 estimates. The estimated average global SBR in 2015 was 18·4 per 1000 births, down from 24·7 in 2000 (25·5% reduction). In 2015, an estimated 2·6 million (uncertainty range 2·4–3·0 million) babies were stillborn, giving a 19% decline in numbers since 2000 with the slowest progress in sub-Saharan Africa. 98% of all stillbirths occur in low-income and middle-income countries; 77% in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Interpretation: Progress in reducing the large worldwide stillbirth burden remains slow and insufficient to meet national targets such as for ENAP. Stillbirths are increasingly being counted at a local level, but countries and the global community must further improve the quality and comparability of data, and ensure that this is more clearly linked to accountability processes including the Sustainable Development Goals. Funding: Save the Children's Saving Newborn Lives programme to The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X15002752
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dr. Hannah Blencowe, MRCPCH
Prof. Simon Cousens, DipMathstat
Fiorella Bianchi Jassir, MSc
Lale Say, MD
Doris Chou, MD
Colin Mathers, PhD
Dan Hogan, PhD
Suhail Shiekh, MSc
Zeshan U Qureshi, BM
Danzhen You, PhD
Prof. Joy E Lawn, FRCPCH
spellingShingle Dr. Hannah Blencowe, MRCPCH
Prof. Simon Cousens, DipMathstat
Fiorella Bianchi Jassir, MSc
Lale Say, MD
Doris Chou, MD
Colin Mathers, PhD
Dan Hogan, PhD
Suhail Shiekh, MSc
Zeshan U Qureshi, BM
Danzhen You, PhD
Prof. Joy E Lawn, FRCPCH
National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis
The Lancet Global Health
author_facet Dr. Hannah Blencowe, MRCPCH
Prof. Simon Cousens, DipMathstat
Fiorella Bianchi Jassir, MSc
Lale Say, MD
Doris Chou, MD
Colin Mathers, PhD
Dan Hogan, PhD
Suhail Shiekh, MSc
Zeshan U Qureshi, BM
Danzhen You, PhD
Prof. Joy E Lawn, FRCPCH
author_sort Dr. Hannah Blencowe, MRCPCH
title National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis
title_short National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis
title_full National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis
title_fullStr National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis
title_full_unstemmed National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis
title_sort national, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis
publisher Elsevier
series The Lancet Global Health
issn 2214-109X
publishDate 2016-02-01
description Background: Previous estimates have highlighted a large global burden of stillbirths, with an absence of reliable data from regions where most stillbirths occur. The Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) targets national stillbirth rates (SBRs) of 12 or fewer stillbirths per 1000 births by 2030. We estimate SBRs and numbers for 195 countries, including trends from 2000 to 2015. Methods: We collated SBR data meeting prespecified inclusion criteria from national routine or registration systems, nationally representative surveys, and other data sources identified through a systematic review, web-based searches, and consultation with stillbirth experts. We modelled SBR (≥28 weeks' gestation) for 195 countries with restricted maximum likelihood estimation with country-level random effects. Uncertainty ranges were obtained through a bootstrap approach. Findings: Data from 157 countries (2207 datapoints) met the inclusion criteria, a 90% increase from 2009 estimates. The estimated average global SBR in 2015 was 18·4 per 1000 births, down from 24·7 in 2000 (25·5% reduction). In 2015, an estimated 2·6 million (uncertainty range 2·4–3·0 million) babies were stillborn, giving a 19% decline in numbers since 2000 with the slowest progress in sub-Saharan Africa. 98% of all stillbirths occur in low-income and middle-income countries; 77% in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Interpretation: Progress in reducing the large worldwide stillbirth burden remains slow and insufficient to meet national targets such as for ENAP. Stillbirths are increasingly being counted at a local level, but countries and the global community must further improve the quality and comparability of data, and ensure that this is more clearly linked to accountability processes including the Sustainable Development Goals. Funding: Save the Children's Saving Newborn Lives programme to The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X15002752
work_keys_str_mv AT drhannahblencowemrcpch nationalregionalandworldwideestimatesofstillbirthratesin2015withtrendsfrom2000asystematicanalysis
AT profsimoncousensdipmathstat nationalregionalandworldwideestimatesofstillbirthratesin2015withtrendsfrom2000asystematicanalysis
AT fiorellabianchijassirmsc nationalregionalandworldwideestimatesofstillbirthratesin2015withtrendsfrom2000asystematicanalysis
AT lalesaymd nationalregionalandworldwideestimatesofstillbirthratesin2015withtrendsfrom2000asystematicanalysis
AT dorischoumd nationalregionalandworldwideestimatesofstillbirthratesin2015withtrendsfrom2000asystematicanalysis
AT colinmathersphd nationalregionalandworldwideestimatesofstillbirthratesin2015withtrendsfrom2000asystematicanalysis
AT danhoganphd nationalregionalandworldwideestimatesofstillbirthratesin2015withtrendsfrom2000asystematicanalysis
AT suhailshiekhmsc nationalregionalandworldwideestimatesofstillbirthratesin2015withtrendsfrom2000asystematicanalysis
AT zeshanuqureshibm nationalregionalandworldwideestimatesofstillbirthratesin2015withtrendsfrom2000asystematicanalysis
AT danzhenyouphd nationalregionalandworldwideestimatesofstillbirthratesin2015withtrendsfrom2000asystematicanalysis
AT profjoyelawnfrcpch nationalregionalandworldwideestimatesofstillbirthratesin2015withtrendsfrom2000asystematicanalysis
_version_ 1724891595633852416