The End of Roman Pottery Production in Southern Britain

This paper seeks to show that a full or partial monetary economy may have continued to operate in parts of Britain into the 2nd quarter of the 5th century at least; changing our perception of early 5th century material culture in South-East Britain from one leaving very few traces in the archaeologi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Malcolm Lyne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of York 2016-03-01
Series:Internet Archaeology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue41/7/index.html
id doaj-2d0599a57c2d44549fce54096203c0b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d0599a57c2d44549fce54096203c0b22020-11-24T20:41:35ZengUniversity of YorkInternet Archaeology1363-53872016-03-014110.11141/ia.41.7The End of Roman Pottery Production in Southern BritainMalcolm LyneThis paper seeks to show that a full or partial monetary economy may have continued to operate in parts of Britain into the 2nd quarter of the 5th century at least; changing our perception of early 5th century material culture in South-East Britain from one leaving very few traces in the archaeological record to one which is an extension of that previously thought to be restricted to the period c.AD 370-410 but which can now be seen to span the period c.AD 370-430/440. Some Romano-British style pottery appears to have continued being made on a much more limited scale into the mid-5th century: a distinctive type of convex-sided dish with solid spaced bosses can be shown to have been made at or near Dorchester-upon-Thames, Portchester and Alice Holt Forest during the 5th century and continued being produced at the first-mentioned place for long enough to be copied by local Anglo-Saxon potters. Adjustments in dating mean that certain peculiarly insular types of military equipment such as the Tortworth strap-end and horse-headed buckle, hitherto dated to the last years of the 4th century, could belong to British soldiers of the early 5th century.http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue41/7/index.htmlarchaeologypotteryeconomyRomano-BritishKentSussexLondonHertfordshireHampshireOxfordshireGloucestershire
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Malcolm Lyne
spellingShingle Malcolm Lyne
The End of Roman Pottery Production in Southern Britain
Internet Archaeology
archaeology
pottery
economy
Romano-British
Kent
Sussex
London
Hertfordshire
Hampshire
Oxfordshire
Gloucestershire
author_facet Malcolm Lyne
author_sort Malcolm Lyne
title The End of Roman Pottery Production in Southern Britain
title_short The End of Roman Pottery Production in Southern Britain
title_full The End of Roman Pottery Production in Southern Britain
title_fullStr The End of Roman Pottery Production in Southern Britain
title_full_unstemmed The End of Roman Pottery Production in Southern Britain
title_sort end of roman pottery production in southern britain
publisher University of York
series Internet Archaeology
issn 1363-5387
publishDate 2016-03-01
description This paper seeks to show that a full or partial monetary economy may have continued to operate in parts of Britain into the 2nd quarter of the 5th century at least; changing our perception of early 5th century material culture in South-East Britain from one leaving very few traces in the archaeological record to one which is an extension of that previously thought to be restricted to the period c.AD 370-410 but which can now be seen to span the period c.AD 370-430/440. Some Romano-British style pottery appears to have continued being made on a much more limited scale into the mid-5th century: a distinctive type of convex-sided dish with solid spaced bosses can be shown to have been made at or near Dorchester-upon-Thames, Portchester and Alice Holt Forest during the 5th century and continued being produced at the first-mentioned place for long enough to be copied by local Anglo-Saxon potters. Adjustments in dating mean that certain peculiarly insular types of military equipment such as the Tortworth strap-end and horse-headed buckle, hitherto dated to the last years of the 4th century, could belong to British soldiers of the early 5th century.
topic archaeology
pottery
economy
Romano-British
Kent
Sussex
London
Hertfordshire
Hampshire
Oxfordshire
Gloucestershire
url http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue41/7/index.html
work_keys_str_mv AT malcolmlyne theendofromanpotteryproductioninsouthernbritain
AT malcolmlyne endofromanpotteryproductioninsouthernbritain
_version_ 1716824575862374400