Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China

Introduction: Effective provision of ecosystem services (ES) and improvements in well-being of residents can be realized through policy interventions of stakeholder behavior. Of the several policies, market-based instruments (MBIs) have become the focus of global attention. Outcomes/others: To coupl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaolong Gao, Weihua Xu, Ying Hou, Zhiyun Ouyang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-12-01
Series:Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2020.1835445
id doaj-2d3a3eccacb14590b35fd65556bceacc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d3a3eccacb14590b35fd65556bceacc2021-07-26T14:51:01ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEcosystem Health and Sustainability2332-88782020-12-016110.1080/20964129.2020.18354451835445Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, ChinaXiaolong Gao0Weihua Xu1Ying Hou2Zhiyun Ouyang3Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of SciencesResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of SciencesResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of SciencesResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of SciencesIntroduction: Effective provision of ecosystem services (ES) and improvements in well-being of residents can be realized through policy interventions of stakeholder behavior. Of the several policies, market-based instruments (MBIs) have become the focus of global attention. Outcomes/others: To couple the theory with practice and solve the key problem of unclear definition of property rights, the framework of MBIs is designed. First, property rights of market creation must be clearly defined, verifiable, transferable, enforceable, and have policy continuity. Then, four key characteristics of MBIs need to be considered in the case design, namely those involving ES, stakeholders, trading mechanisms, and guarantee mechanisms. The Pledge Financing of the Right of the Ecological Public Welfare Forest (PFREPWF) in Lishui City is a typical case of China’s current marketization, which is a supplement and improvement to the ecological compensation policy. Based on clearly defined contract rights, Lishui City has realized the integration of ecological compensation and credit creation. Discussion: The case design still has the problems of lack of quantification and lack of correlations with ES. Conclusion: The theoretical and practical analysis around the market mechanism has reference value for solving market failures and providing environmental services.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2020.1835445market-based instruments(mbis)market failuresecosystem services(es)ecological public welfare forests
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaolong Gao
Weihua Xu
Ying Hou
Zhiyun Ouyang
spellingShingle Xiaolong Gao
Weihua Xu
Ying Hou
Zhiyun Ouyang
Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China
Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
market-based instruments(mbis)
market failures
ecosystem services(es)
ecological public welfare forests
author_facet Xiaolong Gao
Weihua Xu
Ying Hou
Zhiyun Ouyang
author_sort Xiaolong Gao
title Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China
title_short Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China
title_full Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China
title_fullStr Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China
title_full_unstemmed Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China
title_sort market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in lishui city, china
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
issn 2332-8878
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Introduction: Effective provision of ecosystem services (ES) and improvements in well-being of residents can be realized through policy interventions of stakeholder behavior. Of the several policies, market-based instruments (MBIs) have become the focus of global attention. Outcomes/others: To couple the theory with practice and solve the key problem of unclear definition of property rights, the framework of MBIs is designed. First, property rights of market creation must be clearly defined, verifiable, transferable, enforceable, and have policy continuity. Then, four key characteristics of MBIs need to be considered in the case design, namely those involving ES, stakeholders, trading mechanisms, and guarantee mechanisms. The Pledge Financing of the Right of the Ecological Public Welfare Forest (PFREPWF) in Lishui City is a typical case of China’s current marketization, which is a supplement and improvement to the ecological compensation policy. Based on clearly defined contract rights, Lishui City has realized the integration of ecological compensation and credit creation. Discussion: The case design still has the problems of lack of quantification and lack of correlations with ES. Conclusion: The theoretical and practical analysis around the market mechanism has reference value for solving market failures and providing environmental services.
topic market-based instruments(mbis)
market failures
ecosystem services(es)
ecological public welfare forests
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2020.1835445
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaolonggao marketbasedinstrumentsforecosystemservicesframeworkandcasestudyinlishuicitychina
AT weihuaxu marketbasedinstrumentsforecosystemservicesframeworkandcasestudyinlishuicitychina
AT yinghou marketbasedinstrumentsforecosystemservicesframeworkandcasestudyinlishuicitychina
AT zhiyunouyang marketbasedinstrumentsforecosystemservicesframeworkandcasestudyinlishuicitychina
_version_ 1721280946491097088