PRAGMATICS OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AN ANALYSIS OF OBASANJO’S LETTERS

The study investigates the role of language in civic engagement and demonstrates how language is used as a viable tool to propel civic actions. Hence, it focused on the locution and illocutionary acts of Obasanjo's letters to two presidents in Nigeria. Sixty sentences were selected from three o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tolulope Iredele
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tawasul International Centre for Publishing, Research and Dialogue 2021-03-01
Series:International Journal of Language and Literary Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijlls.org/index.php/ijlls/article/view/518
id doaj-2d3ed49019e8488ea462608862343d46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d3ed49019e8488ea462608862343d462021-08-04T17:13:26ZengTawasul International Centre for Publishing, Research and DialogueInternational Journal of Language and Literary Studies2704-55282704-71562021-03-0131567410.36892/ijlls.v3i1.518424PRAGMATICS OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AN ANALYSIS OF OBASANJO’S LETTERSTolulope Iredele0University of Lagos (Research Student)The study investigates the role of language in civic engagement and demonstrates how language is used as a viable tool to propel civic actions. Hence, it focused on the locution and illocutionary acts of Obasanjo's letters to two presidents in Nigeria. Sixty sentences were selected from three open letters. The findings showed that the overall relative frequency percentages are: commissive 15%, assertive 20%, directive 48.3%, declarative 6.7%, and expressive 10%. Results show that Obasanjo, in his letters relied more on sentences that performed directive acts more than other speech acts. However, in his letters to Buhari, he used sentences with assertive acts more than he used in his letter to Jonathan. Hence, the data is characterized by a preponderance of directive, assertive and commissive acts as rhetoric strategies. The study confirms that language use in political discourse is rarely neutral. It further demonstrates that civic engagement drivers manipulate language to influence political decisions and reconstruct public opinion by propelling certain actions or inactions.https://ijlls.org/index.php/ijlls/article/view/518pragmaticcivic engagementletternigeria
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tolulope Iredele
spellingShingle Tolulope Iredele
PRAGMATICS OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AN ANALYSIS OF OBASANJO’S LETTERS
International Journal of Language and Literary Studies
pragmatic
civic engagement
letter
nigeria
author_facet Tolulope Iredele
author_sort Tolulope Iredele
title PRAGMATICS OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AN ANALYSIS OF OBASANJO’S LETTERS
title_short PRAGMATICS OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AN ANALYSIS OF OBASANJO’S LETTERS
title_full PRAGMATICS OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AN ANALYSIS OF OBASANJO’S LETTERS
title_fullStr PRAGMATICS OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AN ANALYSIS OF OBASANJO’S LETTERS
title_full_unstemmed PRAGMATICS OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AN ANALYSIS OF OBASANJO’S LETTERS
title_sort pragmatics of civic engagement an analysis of obasanjo’s letters
publisher Tawasul International Centre for Publishing, Research and Dialogue
series International Journal of Language and Literary Studies
issn 2704-5528
2704-7156
publishDate 2021-03-01
description The study investigates the role of language in civic engagement and demonstrates how language is used as a viable tool to propel civic actions. Hence, it focused on the locution and illocutionary acts of Obasanjo's letters to two presidents in Nigeria. Sixty sentences were selected from three open letters. The findings showed that the overall relative frequency percentages are: commissive 15%, assertive 20%, directive 48.3%, declarative 6.7%, and expressive 10%. Results show that Obasanjo, in his letters relied more on sentences that performed directive acts more than other speech acts. However, in his letters to Buhari, he used sentences with assertive acts more than he used in his letter to Jonathan. Hence, the data is characterized by a preponderance of directive, assertive and commissive acts as rhetoric strategies. The study confirms that language use in political discourse is rarely neutral. It further demonstrates that civic engagement drivers manipulate language to influence political decisions and reconstruct public opinion by propelling certain actions or inactions.
topic pragmatic
civic engagement
letter
nigeria
url https://ijlls.org/index.php/ijlls/article/view/518
work_keys_str_mv AT tolulopeiredele pragmaticsofcivicengagementananalysisofobasanjosletters
_version_ 1721222037594177536