Seeing the Elephant: A Systematic Scoping Review and Comparison of Patient-Centeredness Conceptualizations from Three Seminal Perspectives

Anthony W Olson,1,2 Timothy P Stratton,2 Brian J Isetts,3 Rajiv Vaidyanathan,4 Jared C Van Hooser,2 Jon C Schommer3 1Research Division, Essentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, MN, USA; 2Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota – College of Ph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olson AW, Stratton TP, Isetts BJ, Vaidyanathan R, Van Hooser JC, Schommer JC
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2021-04-01
Series:Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/seeing-the-elephant-a-systematic-scoping-review-and-comparison-of-pati-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH
id doaj-2d68baafe61a43ff946b31491569c3e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d68baafe61a43ff946b31491569c3e32021-04-29T19:52:46ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare1178-23902021-04-01Volume 1497398664347Seeing the Elephant: A Systematic Scoping Review and Comparison of Patient-Centeredness Conceptualizations from Three Seminal PerspectivesOlson AWStratton TPIsetts BJVaidyanathan RVan Hooser JCSchommer JCAnthony W Olson,1,2 Timothy P Stratton,2 Brian J Isetts,3 Rajiv Vaidyanathan,4 Jared C Van Hooser,2 Jon C Schommer3 1Research Division, Essentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, MN, USA; 2Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota – College of Pharmacy, Duluth, MN, USA; 3Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, University of Minnesota – College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN, USA; 4Department of Marketing, University of Minnesota Duluth – Labovitz School of Business and Economics, Duluth, MN, USACorrespondence: Anthony W Olson 502 E 2nd Street, Duluth, MN, 55805, USATel +1 218 786 1754Fax +1 218 786 8159Email anthony.olson@essentiahealth.orgAbstract: “Patient-Centeredness” (PC) is a theoretical construct made up of a diverse constellation of distinct concepts, processes, practices, and outcomes that have been developed, arranged, and prioritized heterogeneously by different communities of professional healthcare practice, research, and policy. It is bound together by a common ethos that puts the holistic individual at the functional and symbolic center of their care, a quality deemed essential for chronic disease management and health promotion. Several important contributions to the PC research space have adeptly integrated seminal PC conceptualizations to improve conceptual clarity, measurement, implementation, and evaluation in research and practice. This systematic scoping review builds on that work, but with a purpose to explicitly identify, compare, and contrast the seminal PC conceptualizations arising from the different healthcare professional groups. The rationale for this work is that a deeper examination of the underlying development and corresponding assumptions from each respective conceptualization will lead to a more informed understanding of and meaningful contributions to PC research and practice, especially for healthcare professional groups newer to the topic area like pharmacy. The literature search identified four seminal conceptualizations from the healthcare professions of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Policy. A compositional comparison across the seminal conceptualizations revealed a shared ethos but also six distinguishing features: (1) organizational structure; (2) predominant level of care; (3) methodological approach; (4) care setting origin; (5) outcomes of interest; and (6) language. The findings illuminate PC’s stable theoretical foundations and distinctive nuances needed to appropriately understand, apply, and evaluate the construct’s operationalization in contemporary healthcare research and practice. These considerations hold important implications for future research into the fundamental aims of healthcare, how it should look when practiced, and what should reasonably be required of it.Keywords: patient-centeredness, medicine, nursing, health policy, pharmacy, systematic scoping reviewhttps://www.dovepress.com/seeing-the-elephant-a-systematic-scoping-review-and-comparison-of-pati-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDHpatient-centerednessmedicinenursinghealth policypharmacysystematic scoping review
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olson AW
Stratton TP
Isetts BJ
Vaidyanathan R
Van Hooser JC
Schommer JC
spellingShingle Olson AW
Stratton TP
Isetts BJ
Vaidyanathan R
Van Hooser JC
Schommer JC
Seeing the Elephant: A Systematic Scoping Review and Comparison of Patient-Centeredness Conceptualizations from Three Seminal Perspectives
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
patient-centeredness
medicine
nursing
health policy
pharmacy
systematic scoping review
author_facet Olson AW
Stratton TP
Isetts BJ
Vaidyanathan R
Van Hooser JC
Schommer JC
author_sort Olson AW
title Seeing the Elephant: A Systematic Scoping Review and Comparison of Patient-Centeredness Conceptualizations from Three Seminal Perspectives
title_short Seeing the Elephant: A Systematic Scoping Review and Comparison of Patient-Centeredness Conceptualizations from Three Seminal Perspectives
title_full Seeing the Elephant: A Systematic Scoping Review and Comparison of Patient-Centeredness Conceptualizations from Three Seminal Perspectives
title_fullStr Seeing the Elephant: A Systematic Scoping Review and Comparison of Patient-Centeredness Conceptualizations from Three Seminal Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Seeing the Elephant: A Systematic Scoping Review and Comparison of Patient-Centeredness Conceptualizations from Three Seminal Perspectives
title_sort seeing the elephant: a systematic scoping review and comparison of patient-centeredness conceptualizations from three seminal perspectives
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
issn 1178-2390
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Anthony W Olson,1,2 Timothy P Stratton,2 Brian J Isetts,3 Rajiv Vaidyanathan,4 Jared C Van Hooser,2 Jon C Schommer3 1Research Division, Essentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, MN, USA; 2Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota – College of Pharmacy, Duluth, MN, USA; 3Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, University of Minnesota – College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN, USA; 4Department of Marketing, University of Minnesota Duluth – Labovitz School of Business and Economics, Duluth, MN, USACorrespondence: Anthony W Olson 502 E 2nd Street, Duluth, MN, 55805, USATel +1 218 786 1754Fax +1 218 786 8159Email anthony.olson@essentiahealth.orgAbstract: “Patient-Centeredness” (PC) is a theoretical construct made up of a diverse constellation of distinct concepts, processes, practices, and outcomes that have been developed, arranged, and prioritized heterogeneously by different communities of professional healthcare practice, research, and policy. It is bound together by a common ethos that puts the holistic individual at the functional and symbolic center of their care, a quality deemed essential for chronic disease management and health promotion. Several important contributions to the PC research space have adeptly integrated seminal PC conceptualizations to improve conceptual clarity, measurement, implementation, and evaluation in research and practice. This systematic scoping review builds on that work, but with a purpose to explicitly identify, compare, and contrast the seminal PC conceptualizations arising from the different healthcare professional groups. The rationale for this work is that a deeper examination of the underlying development and corresponding assumptions from each respective conceptualization will lead to a more informed understanding of and meaningful contributions to PC research and practice, especially for healthcare professional groups newer to the topic area like pharmacy. The literature search identified four seminal conceptualizations from the healthcare professions of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Policy. A compositional comparison across the seminal conceptualizations revealed a shared ethos but also six distinguishing features: (1) organizational structure; (2) predominant level of care; (3) methodological approach; (4) care setting origin; (5) outcomes of interest; and (6) language. The findings illuminate PC’s stable theoretical foundations and distinctive nuances needed to appropriately understand, apply, and evaluate the construct’s operationalization in contemporary healthcare research and practice. These considerations hold important implications for future research into the fundamental aims of healthcare, how it should look when practiced, and what should reasonably be required of it.Keywords: patient-centeredness, medicine, nursing, health policy, pharmacy, systematic scoping review
topic patient-centeredness
medicine
nursing
health policy
pharmacy
systematic scoping review
url https://www.dovepress.com/seeing-the-elephant-a-systematic-scoping-review-and-comparison-of-pati-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH
work_keys_str_mv AT olsonaw seeingtheelephantasystematicscopingreviewandcomparisonofpatientcenterednessconceptualizationsfromthreeseminalperspectives
AT strattontp seeingtheelephantasystematicscopingreviewandcomparisonofpatientcenterednessconceptualizationsfromthreeseminalperspectives
AT isettsbj seeingtheelephantasystematicscopingreviewandcomparisonofpatientcenterednessconceptualizationsfromthreeseminalperspectives
AT vaidyanathanr seeingtheelephantasystematicscopingreviewandcomparisonofpatientcenterednessconceptualizationsfromthreeseminalperspectives
AT vanhooserjc seeingtheelephantasystematicscopingreviewandcomparisonofpatientcenterednessconceptualizationsfromthreeseminalperspectives
AT schommerjc seeingtheelephantasystematicscopingreviewandcomparisonofpatientcenterednessconceptualizationsfromthreeseminalperspectives
_version_ 1721500415137153024