Cultural Diversity Issues in Biodiversity Monitoring—Cases of Lithuania, Poland and Denmark

Public participation is a key element in nature conservation in Europe and a necessity for collecting broad scale data on biodiversity and its dynamics. However, vast societal differences exist between eastern and western European countries, resulting in problems for public participation in post-com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Małgorzata Grodzińska-Jurczak, Hanna Kobierska, Dirk S. Schmeller, Deivida Vandzinskaite
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2010-09-01
Series:Diversity
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/2/9/1130/
id doaj-2d7667854923411a9b44f42856996b89
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d7667854923411a9b44f42856996b892020-11-24T23:26:34ZengMDPI AGDiversity1424-28182010-09-01291130114510.3390/d2091130Cultural Diversity Issues in Biodiversity Monitoring—Cases of Lithuania, Poland and DenmarkMałgorzata Grodzińska-JurczakHanna KobierskaDirk S. SchmellerDeivida VandzinskaitePublic participation is a key element in nature conservation in Europe and a necessity for collecting broad scale data on biodiversity and its dynamics. However, vast societal differences exist between eastern and western European countries, resulting in problems for public participation in post-communist states as compared to western countries. Here, we compare diversity in monitoring practices and public participation in countries with different political histories. Drawing on in-depth ethnographic studies conducted in Lithuania and Poland, as well as a rapid assessment in Denmark, we have focused on the historical, cultural and social determinants of the volunteers’ participation in biodiversity monitoring. Our results indicate the reasons why volunteer involvement—as an expression of a participatory approach—has a lower incidence in the post-communist countries, compared to voluntarism common in occidental democracies. We discuss our results in the context of the main social factors considered to be a legacy of the Soviet regime. http://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/2/9/1130/amateursbiodiversity monitoringcommunist legacyhuman dimensioncultural diversitypublic participatoryvolunteers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Małgorzata Grodzińska-Jurczak
Hanna Kobierska
Dirk S. Schmeller
Deivida Vandzinskaite
spellingShingle Małgorzata Grodzińska-Jurczak
Hanna Kobierska
Dirk S. Schmeller
Deivida Vandzinskaite
Cultural Diversity Issues in Biodiversity Monitoring—Cases of Lithuania, Poland and Denmark
Diversity
amateurs
biodiversity monitoring
communist legacy
human dimension
cultural diversity
public participatory
volunteers
author_facet Małgorzata Grodzińska-Jurczak
Hanna Kobierska
Dirk S. Schmeller
Deivida Vandzinskaite
author_sort Małgorzata Grodzińska-Jurczak
title Cultural Diversity Issues in Biodiversity Monitoring—Cases of Lithuania, Poland and Denmark
title_short Cultural Diversity Issues in Biodiversity Monitoring—Cases of Lithuania, Poland and Denmark
title_full Cultural Diversity Issues in Biodiversity Monitoring—Cases of Lithuania, Poland and Denmark
title_fullStr Cultural Diversity Issues in Biodiversity Monitoring—Cases of Lithuania, Poland and Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Cultural Diversity Issues in Biodiversity Monitoring—Cases of Lithuania, Poland and Denmark
title_sort cultural diversity issues in biodiversity monitoring—cases of lithuania, poland and denmark
publisher MDPI AG
series Diversity
issn 1424-2818
publishDate 2010-09-01
description Public participation is a key element in nature conservation in Europe and a necessity for collecting broad scale data on biodiversity and its dynamics. However, vast societal differences exist between eastern and western European countries, resulting in problems for public participation in post-communist states as compared to western countries. Here, we compare diversity in monitoring practices and public participation in countries with different political histories. Drawing on in-depth ethnographic studies conducted in Lithuania and Poland, as well as a rapid assessment in Denmark, we have focused on the historical, cultural and social determinants of the volunteers’ participation in biodiversity monitoring. Our results indicate the reasons why volunteer involvement—as an expression of a participatory approach—has a lower incidence in the post-communist countries, compared to voluntarism common in occidental democracies. We discuss our results in the context of the main social factors considered to be a legacy of the Soviet regime.
topic amateurs
biodiversity monitoring
communist legacy
human dimension
cultural diversity
public participatory
volunteers
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/2/9/1130/
work_keys_str_mv AT małgorzatagrodzinskajurczak culturaldiversityissuesinbiodiversitymonitoringcasesoflithuaniapolandanddenmark
AT hannakobierska culturaldiversityissuesinbiodiversitymonitoringcasesoflithuaniapolandanddenmark
AT dirksschmeller culturaldiversityissuesinbiodiversitymonitoringcasesoflithuaniapolandanddenmark
AT deividavandzinskaite culturaldiversityissuesinbiodiversitymonitoringcasesoflithuaniapolandanddenmark
_version_ 1725554556717236224