An In-Laboratory Comparison of FocusBand EEG Device and Textile Electrodes Against a Medical-Grade System and Wet Gel Electrodes

In this study, FocusBand (FocusBand Technologies, T 2 Green Pty Ltd.) textile electrodes were tested against medical-grade wet electrodes to investigate the possible differences in skin-electrode interface behavior and EEG signals&#x2019; quality. <italic>In vivo</italic> electrical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matias Rusanen, Sami Myllymaa, Laura Kalevo, Katja Myllymaa, Juha Toyras, Timo Leppanen, Samu Kainulainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2021-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9539188/
id doaj-2da7c4e34acd4765992e2c72da1e26e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2da7c4e34acd4765992e2c72da1e26e32021-10-04T23:00:56ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362021-01-01913258013259110.1109/ACCESS.2021.31130499539188An In-Laboratory Comparison of FocusBand EEG Device and Textile Electrodes Against a Medical-Grade System and Wet Gel ElectrodesMatias Rusanen0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9633-6016Sami Myllymaa1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9779-4358Laura Kalevo2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8084-4160Katja Myllymaa3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5780-1982Juha Toyras4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8035-1606Timo Leppanen5https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4017-821XSamu Kainulainen6https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2798-2115Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, FinlandDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, FinlandDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, FinlandDiagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, FinlandDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, FinlandDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, FinlandDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, FinlandIn this study, FocusBand (FocusBand Technologies, T 2 Green Pty Ltd.) textile electrodes were tested against medical-grade wet electrodes to investigate the possible differences in skin-electrode interface behavior and EEG signals&#x2019; quality. <italic>In vivo</italic> electrical impedance spectroscopy and simultaneous forehead EEG measurements were performed with ten healthy subjects. In addition, the FocusBand device was tested in a stand-alone manner against a medical-grade reference system using similar test measurements. Compared to wet electrodes, textile electrodes had higher median absolute skin-electrode impedances five minutes after the attachment, but this difference decreased to 50&#x2013;55 &#x0025; of the initial during the first 60 minutes on all measured frequencies (1&#x2013;1000 Hz). Textile and wet electrodes produced highly consistent EEG signals at forehead Fp1 and Fp2 locations. From those, Fp1 signals were more consistent in terms of normalized cross-correlations and agreement of the relative spectral powers. A stand-alone comparison showed that the FocusBand device can be used to record forehead biopotential signals, but the quality was not as consistent as with the medical-grade system. Based on impedance characteristics, a recording made using FocusBand textile electrodes may be more susceptible to artifacts than recording made using the medical-grade wet electrodes. However, FocusBand textile electrodes can be used, after a short stabilization period, to reliably record forehead EEG signals with a quality almost equal to that reached with medical-grade wet electrodes.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9539188/Dry electrodeelectroencephalographyimpedancesleeptextile electrodewearable
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matias Rusanen
Sami Myllymaa
Laura Kalevo
Katja Myllymaa
Juha Toyras
Timo Leppanen
Samu Kainulainen
spellingShingle Matias Rusanen
Sami Myllymaa
Laura Kalevo
Katja Myllymaa
Juha Toyras
Timo Leppanen
Samu Kainulainen
An In-Laboratory Comparison of FocusBand EEG Device and Textile Electrodes Against a Medical-Grade System and Wet Gel Electrodes
IEEE Access
Dry electrode
electroencephalography
impedance
sleep
textile electrode
wearable
author_facet Matias Rusanen
Sami Myllymaa
Laura Kalevo
Katja Myllymaa
Juha Toyras
Timo Leppanen
Samu Kainulainen
author_sort Matias Rusanen
title An In-Laboratory Comparison of FocusBand EEG Device and Textile Electrodes Against a Medical-Grade System and Wet Gel Electrodes
title_short An In-Laboratory Comparison of FocusBand EEG Device and Textile Electrodes Against a Medical-Grade System and Wet Gel Electrodes
title_full An In-Laboratory Comparison of FocusBand EEG Device and Textile Electrodes Against a Medical-Grade System and Wet Gel Electrodes
title_fullStr An In-Laboratory Comparison of FocusBand EEG Device and Textile Electrodes Against a Medical-Grade System and Wet Gel Electrodes
title_full_unstemmed An In-Laboratory Comparison of FocusBand EEG Device and Textile Electrodes Against a Medical-Grade System and Wet Gel Electrodes
title_sort in-laboratory comparison of focusband eeg device and textile electrodes against a medical-grade system and wet gel electrodes
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2021-01-01
description In this study, FocusBand (FocusBand Technologies, T 2 Green Pty Ltd.) textile electrodes were tested against medical-grade wet electrodes to investigate the possible differences in skin-electrode interface behavior and EEG signals&#x2019; quality. <italic>In vivo</italic> electrical impedance spectroscopy and simultaneous forehead EEG measurements were performed with ten healthy subjects. In addition, the FocusBand device was tested in a stand-alone manner against a medical-grade reference system using similar test measurements. Compared to wet electrodes, textile electrodes had higher median absolute skin-electrode impedances five minutes after the attachment, but this difference decreased to 50&#x2013;55 &#x0025; of the initial during the first 60 minutes on all measured frequencies (1&#x2013;1000 Hz). Textile and wet electrodes produced highly consistent EEG signals at forehead Fp1 and Fp2 locations. From those, Fp1 signals were more consistent in terms of normalized cross-correlations and agreement of the relative spectral powers. A stand-alone comparison showed that the FocusBand device can be used to record forehead biopotential signals, but the quality was not as consistent as with the medical-grade system. Based on impedance characteristics, a recording made using FocusBand textile electrodes may be more susceptible to artifacts than recording made using the medical-grade wet electrodes. However, FocusBand textile electrodes can be used, after a short stabilization period, to reliably record forehead EEG signals with a quality almost equal to that reached with medical-grade wet electrodes.
topic Dry electrode
electroencephalography
impedance
sleep
textile electrode
wearable
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9539188/
work_keys_str_mv AT matiasrusanen aninlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT samimyllymaa aninlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT laurakalevo aninlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT katjamyllymaa aninlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT juhatoyras aninlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT timoleppanen aninlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT samukainulainen aninlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT matiasrusanen inlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT samimyllymaa inlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT laurakalevo inlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT katjamyllymaa inlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT juhatoyras inlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT timoleppanen inlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
AT samukainulainen inlaboratorycomparisonoffocusbandeegdeviceandtextileelectrodesagainstamedicalgradesystemandwetgelelectrodes
_version_ 1716843798742433792