Apologies for Blanks or Laments for Dumbness: Tina Darragh’s Opposable Dumbs as Open Source and/or Open Content

This essay engages in a reading of Tina Darragh’s publication 'Opposable Dumbs'  (2010). This reading is carried out in pursuit of a number of critical and theoretical questions, that include asking what sort of text this is, and how we might read it. The essay considers how Darragh’s work...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mark Leahy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2016-04-01
Series:C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-century Writings
Subjects:
Online Access:http://c21.openlibhums.org/articles/4
id doaj-2db0e83cd2b64a9089ab63c45766707a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2db0e83cd2b64a9089ab63c45766707a2021-06-02T03:38:37ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesC21 Literature: Journal of 21st-century Writings2045-52162045-52242016-04-014110.16995/c21.45Apologies for Blanks or Laments for Dumbness: Tina Darragh’s Opposable Dumbs as Open Source and/or Open ContentMark Leahy0Falmouth UniversityThis essay engages in a reading of Tina Darragh’s publication 'Opposable Dumbs'  (2010). This reading is carried out in pursuit of a number of critical and theoretical questions, that include asking what sort of text this is, and how we might read it. The essay considers how Darragh’s work connects to the debate around open source and free software, and to the politics and poetics of that debate. Taking up the call for creative responses in Darragh’s anti-rights or inverted copyright statement, the writing takes a route through the text that parallels some of Darragh’s strategies as a writer. This creative reading is linked to a reading of Stephen Voyce’s essay on open source poetics (2011), with some reference to a wider discourse around FLOSS, creative commons, and copyleft strategies. This essay proposes Darragh’s work as a case study for Voyce’s proposals, and suggests that her practice may in fact go further than he proposes in moving from a position of ‘open source’ to one of ‘open content.’http://c21.openlibhums.org/articles/4open sourcepoetryTina Darraghcreative writing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark Leahy
spellingShingle Mark Leahy
Apologies for Blanks or Laments for Dumbness: Tina Darragh’s Opposable Dumbs as Open Source and/or Open Content
C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-century Writings
open source
poetry
Tina Darragh
creative writing
author_facet Mark Leahy
author_sort Mark Leahy
title Apologies for Blanks or Laments for Dumbness: Tina Darragh’s Opposable Dumbs as Open Source and/or Open Content
title_short Apologies for Blanks or Laments for Dumbness: Tina Darragh’s Opposable Dumbs as Open Source and/or Open Content
title_full Apologies for Blanks or Laments for Dumbness: Tina Darragh’s Opposable Dumbs as Open Source and/or Open Content
title_fullStr Apologies for Blanks or Laments for Dumbness: Tina Darragh’s Opposable Dumbs as Open Source and/or Open Content
title_full_unstemmed Apologies for Blanks or Laments for Dumbness: Tina Darragh’s Opposable Dumbs as Open Source and/or Open Content
title_sort apologies for blanks or laments for dumbness: tina darragh’s opposable dumbs as open source and/or open content
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-century Writings
issn 2045-5216
2045-5224
publishDate 2016-04-01
description This essay engages in a reading of Tina Darragh’s publication 'Opposable Dumbs'  (2010). This reading is carried out in pursuit of a number of critical and theoretical questions, that include asking what sort of text this is, and how we might read it. The essay considers how Darragh’s work connects to the debate around open source and free software, and to the politics and poetics of that debate. Taking up the call for creative responses in Darragh’s anti-rights or inverted copyright statement, the writing takes a route through the text that parallels some of Darragh’s strategies as a writer. This creative reading is linked to a reading of Stephen Voyce’s essay on open source poetics (2011), with some reference to a wider discourse around FLOSS, creative commons, and copyleft strategies. This essay proposes Darragh’s work as a case study for Voyce’s proposals, and suggests that her practice may in fact go further than he proposes in moving from a position of ‘open source’ to one of ‘open content.’
topic open source
poetry
Tina Darragh
creative writing
url http://c21.openlibhums.org/articles/4
work_keys_str_mv AT markleahy apologiesforblanksorlamentsfordumbnesstinadarraghsopposabledumbsasopensourceandoropencontent
_version_ 1721408814171815936