Nicotine replacement therapy products over the counter: real‐life use in the Australian community

Abstract Objective: To explore the information received by NRT users; whether patterns of NRT use are in accordance with recommendations; and to identify the characteristics of those using NRT products. Methods: A cross‐sectional, omnibus telephone survey of 1,509 community members was conducted in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christine L. Paul, Raoul A. Walsh, Afaf Girgis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2003-10-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00820.x
id doaj-2dbefb862cb945339172334eae5dce3e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2dbefb862cb945339172334eae5dce3e2020-11-24T22:26:29ZengWileyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052003-10-0127549149510.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00820.xNicotine replacement therapy products over the counter: real‐life use in the Australian communityChristine L. Paul0Raoul A. Walsh1Afaf Girgis2Centre for Health Research & Psycho‐oncology (CHeRP), The Cancer Council New South Wales/University of Newcastle, New South WalesCentre for Health Research & Psycho‐oncology (CHeRP), The Cancer Council New South Wales/University of Newcastle, New South WalesCentre for Health Research & Psycho‐oncology (CHeRP), The Cancer Council New South Wales/University of Newcastle, New South WalesAbstract Objective: To explore the information received by NRT users; whether patterns of NRT use are in accordance with recommendations; and to identify the characteristics of those using NRT products. Methods: A cross‐sectional, omnibus telephone survey of 1,509 community members was conducted in New South Wales, Australia in 2000. The survey identified 215 current and former smokers who completed additional questions regarding their most recent quit attempt. Results: Of the 215 current and former smokers, 67 (31.2%) had used NRT on their most recent quit attempt. The majority of NRT use (61%) lasted for less than two weeks. More than 40% of NRT users reported receiving no instructions from a doctor or pharmacist on how to use the product. Approximately one‐third of NRT use was associated with concomitant smoking, with 10% of NRT use being associated with little or no reduction in reported daily cigarette consumption. Only 41.8% of NRT users reported a doctor had recommended using the product. Conclusions: Despite the small size of the sample, the data suggest a level of inappropriate use of NRT products in the community. Implications: Wider use and effective provision of support and advice to NRT users in the community must be addressed if this product is to achieve its optimal potential in aiding smoking cessation.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00820.x
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christine L. Paul
Raoul A. Walsh
Afaf Girgis
spellingShingle Christine L. Paul
Raoul A. Walsh
Afaf Girgis
Nicotine replacement therapy products over the counter: real‐life use in the Australian community
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
author_facet Christine L. Paul
Raoul A. Walsh
Afaf Girgis
author_sort Christine L. Paul
title Nicotine replacement therapy products over the counter: real‐life use in the Australian community
title_short Nicotine replacement therapy products over the counter: real‐life use in the Australian community
title_full Nicotine replacement therapy products over the counter: real‐life use in the Australian community
title_fullStr Nicotine replacement therapy products over the counter: real‐life use in the Australian community
title_full_unstemmed Nicotine replacement therapy products over the counter: real‐life use in the Australian community
title_sort nicotine replacement therapy products over the counter: real‐life use in the australian community
publisher Wiley
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
publishDate 2003-10-01
description Abstract Objective: To explore the information received by NRT users; whether patterns of NRT use are in accordance with recommendations; and to identify the characteristics of those using NRT products. Methods: A cross‐sectional, omnibus telephone survey of 1,509 community members was conducted in New South Wales, Australia in 2000. The survey identified 215 current and former smokers who completed additional questions regarding their most recent quit attempt. Results: Of the 215 current and former smokers, 67 (31.2%) had used NRT on their most recent quit attempt. The majority of NRT use (61%) lasted for less than two weeks. More than 40% of NRT users reported receiving no instructions from a doctor or pharmacist on how to use the product. Approximately one‐third of NRT use was associated with concomitant smoking, with 10% of NRT use being associated with little or no reduction in reported daily cigarette consumption. Only 41.8% of NRT users reported a doctor had recommended using the product. Conclusions: Despite the small size of the sample, the data suggest a level of inappropriate use of NRT products in the community. Implications: Wider use and effective provision of support and advice to NRT users in the community must be addressed if this product is to achieve its optimal potential in aiding smoking cessation.
url https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00820.x
work_keys_str_mv AT christinelpaul nicotinereplacementtherapyproductsoverthecounterreallifeuseintheaustraliancommunity
AT raoulawalsh nicotinereplacementtherapyproductsoverthecounterreallifeuseintheaustraliancommunity
AT afafgirgis nicotinereplacementtherapyproductsoverthecounterreallifeuseintheaustraliancommunity
_version_ 1725753387533729792