Stormwater Biofilters as Barriers against Campylobacter jejuni, Cryptosporidium Oocysts and Adenoviruses; Results from a Laboratory Trial

Biofilters are a widely used stormwater treatment technology. However; other than some evidence regarding non-pathogenic indicator microorganisms; there are significant knowledge gaps in the capacity of stormwater biofilters to remove actual pathogens and how this removal is impacted by biofilter de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gayani Chandrasena, Ana Deletic, Anna Lintern, Rebekah Henry, David McCarthy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-12-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/9/12/949
id doaj-2e2e920d13ea44aba4bbe91443d5fde2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e2e920d13ea44aba4bbe91443d5fde22020-11-25T01:49:47ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412017-12-0191294910.3390/w9120949w9120949Stormwater Biofilters as Barriers against Campylobacter jejuni, Cryptosporidium Oocysts and Adenoviruses; Results from a Laboratory TrialGayani Chandrasena0Ana Deletic1Anna Lintern2Rebekah Henry3David McCarthy4Environmental and Public Health Microbiology Laboratory (EPHM Lab), Monash Water for Liveability, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria 3800, AustraliaEnvironmental and Public Health Microbiology Laboratory (EPHM Lab), Monash Water for Liveability, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria 3800, AustraliaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria 3800, AustraliaEnvironmental and Public Health Microbiology Laboratory (EPHM Lab), Monash Water for Liveability, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria 3800, AustraliaEnvironmental and Public Health Microbiology Laboratory (EPHM Lab), Monash Water for Liveability, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria 3800, AustraliaBiofilters are a widely used stormwater treatment technology. However; other than some evidence regarding non-pathogenic indicator microorganisms; there are significant knowledge gaps in the capacity of stormwater biofilters to remove actual pathogens and how this removal is impacted by biofilter design elements and operational conditions. In this study; we explored the capacity of stormwater biofilters to remove three reference pathogens (Campylobacter spp.; adenovirus and Cryptosporidium oocysts) and compared these to commonly used indicator microorganisms (E. coli; FRNA coliphages and Clostridium perfringens). Two different biofilter designs; each having a submerged zone (SZ); were tested under extended dry weather periods (up to 4 weeks) and different event volumes (the equivalent of 1–2 pore volumes) in a laboratory trial. These systems were able to consistently reduce the concentrations of all tested reference pathogens (average log reduction in Campylobacter spp. = 0.7; adenovirus = 1.0 and Cryptosporidium oocysts = 1.7) and two of the indicators (average log reduction in E. coli = 1.2 and C. perfringens = 2.1). However; none of the tested indicators consistently mimicked the removal performance of their corresponding reference pathogens after extended dry weather periods and during larger simulated storm events. This indicates that the behaviour of these pathogens in stormwater biofilters are not adequately represented by their corresponding indicator microorganisms and that to optimise biofilter designs for pathogen removal it is critical to further study pathogen removal processes in these systems.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/9/12/949adenovirusesCampylobacterCryptosporidium oocystsrain gardenstormwater harvestingstormwater management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gayani Chandrasena
Ana Deletic
Anna Lintern
Rebekah Henry
David McCarthy
spellingShingle Gayani Chandrasena
Ana Deletic
Anna Lintern
Rebekah Henry
David McCarthy
Stormwater Biofilters as Barriers against Campylobacter jejuni, Cryptosporidium Oocysts and Adenoviruses; Results from a Laboratory Trial
Water
adenoviruses
Campylobacter
Cryptosporidium oocysts
rain garden
stormwater harvesting
stormwater management
author_facet Gayani Chandrasena
Ana Deletic
Anna Lintern
Rebekah Henry
David McCarthy
author_sort Gayani Chandrasena
title Stormwater Biofilters as Barriers against Campylobacter jejuni, Cryptosporidium Oocysts and Adenoviruses; Results from a Laboratory Trial
title_short Stormwater Biofilters as Barriers against Campylobacter jejuni, Cryptosporidium Oocysts and Adenoviruses; Results from a Laboratory Trial
title_full Stormwater Biofilters as Barriers against Campylobacter jejuni, Cryptosporidium Oocysts and Adenoviruses; Results from a Laboratory Trial
title_fullStr Stormwater Biofilters as Barriers against Campylobacter jejuni, Cryptosporidium Oocysts and Adenoviruses; Results from a Laboratory Trial
title_full_unstemmed Stormwater Biofilters as Barriers against Campylobacter jejuni, Cryptosporidium Oocysts and Adenoviruses; Results from a Laboratory Trial
title_sort stormwater biofilters as barriers against campylobacter jejuni, cryptosporidium oocysts and adenoviruses; results from a laboratory trial
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Biofilters are a widely used stormwater treatment technology. However; other than some evidence regarding non-pathogenic indicator microorganisms; there are significant knowledge gaps in the capacity of stormwater biofilters to remove actual pathogens and how this removal is impacted by biofilter design elements and operational conditions. In this study; we explored the capacity of stormwater biofilters to remove three reference pathogens (Campylobacter spp.; adenovirus and Cryptosporidium oocysts) and compared these to commonly used indicator microorganisms (E. coli; FRNA coliphages and Clostridium perfringens). Two different biofilter designs; each having a submerged zone (SZ); were tested under extended dry weather periods (up to 4 weeks) and different event volumes (the equivalent of 1–2 pore volumes) in a laboratory trial. These systems were able to consistently reduce the concentrations of all tested reference pathogens (average log reduction in Campylobacter spp. = 0.7; adenovirus = 1.0 and Cryptosporidium oocysts = 1.7) and two of the indicators (average log reduction in E. coli = 1.2 and C. perfringens = 2.1). However; none of the tested indicators consistently mimicked the removal performance of their corresponding reference pathogens after extended dry weather periods and during larger simulated storm events. This indicates that the behaviour of these pathogens in stormwater biofilters are not adequately represented by their corresponding indicator microorganisms and that to optimise biofilter designs for pathogen removal it is critical to further study pathogen removal processes in these systems.
topic adenoviruses
Campylobacter
Cryptosporidium oocysts
rain garden
stormwater harvesting
stormwater management
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/9/12/949
work_keys_str_mv AT gayanichandrasena stormwaterbiofiltersasbarriersagainstcampylobacterjejunicryptosporidiumoocystsandadenovirusesresultsfromalaboratorytrial
AT anadeletic stormwaterbiofiltersasbarriersagainstcampylobacterjejunicryptosporidiumoocystsandadenovirusesresultsfromalaboratorytrial
AT annalintern stormwaterbiofiltersasbarriersagainstcampylobacterjejunicryptosporidiumoocystsandadenovirusesresultsfromalaboratorytrial
AT rebekahhenry stormwaterbiofiltersasbarriersagainstcampylobacterjejunicryptosporidiumoocystsandadenovirusesresultsfromalaboratorytrial
AT davidmccarthy stormwaterbiofiltersasbarriersagainstcampylobacterjejunicryptosporidiumoocystsandadenovirusesresultsfromalaboratorytrial
_version_ 1725005060293787648