Response of Drip Irrigation and Fertigation on Cumin Yield, Quality, and Water-Use Efficiency Grown under Arid Climatic Conditions

A three-year field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station of Mandor, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, under arid climatic conditions in the rabi season of 2016–2019 with the objectives of evaluating the effect of drip irrigation and fertigation levels on cumin plant growth, yield, oil cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moti Lal Mehriya, Neelam Geat, Sarita, Hari Singh, Mohamed A. Mattar, Hosam O. Elansary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
WUE
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/11/1711
id doaj-2e9486b4c6e946eba6e5e978ec9d58c0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e9486b4c6e946eba6e5e978ec9d58c02021-04-02T13:15:01ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952020-11-01101711171110.3390/agronomy10111711Response of Drip Irrigation and Fertigation on Cumin Yield, Quality, and Water-Use Efficiency Grown under Arid Climatic ConditionsMoti Lal Mehriya0Neelam Geat1Sarita2Hari Singh3Mohamed A. Mattar4Hosam O. Elansary5Agricultural Research Station, Mandor, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342304, Rajasthan, IndiaAgricultural Research Station, Mandor, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342304, Rajasthan, IndiaCollege of Agriculture, Jodhpur, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342304, Rajasthan, IndiaKrishi Vigyan Kendra, Sirohi, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342304, Rajasthan, IndiaDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi ArabiaPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi ArabiaA three-year field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station of Mandor, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, under arid climatic conditions in the rabi season of 2016–2019 with the objectives of evaluating the effect of drip irrigation and fertigation levels on cumin plant growth, yield, oil content, water-use efficiency, and water productivity. The pooled data revealed that the drip irrigation at 0.6 cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) recorded significantly higher plant height (31.4 cm), umbels plant<sup>−1</sup> (50.4), umbellates umbel<sup>−1</sup> (5.07), seeds umbel<sup>−1</sup> (5.34), test weight (4.60 g), seed yield (1063 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), gross return (₹ 172,600 ha<sup>−1</sup>), net return (₹ 113,500 ha<sup>−1</sup>) and benefit, and cost ratio (2.9) over drip fertigation at 0.4 CPE and surface irrigation with 0.8 CPE. The fertigation with 80% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) being at par with 100% RDF recorded a significantly higher number of umbels plant<sup>−1</sup> (50.0), umbellates umbel<sup>−1</sup> (5.03), seeds umbellate<sup>−1</sup> (5.24), test weight (4.67 g), seed yield (1052 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), gross return (₹ 170,900 ha<sup>−1</sup>), net return (₹ 111,700 ha<sup>−1</sup>), and benefit cost ratio (2.9) over fertigation with 60% RDF and control. Maximum water-use efficiency (5.7 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> mm<sup>−1</sup>) and water saving (39.04%) was observed under drip irrigation at 0.4 CPE followed by 0.6 CPE (4.8 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> mm<sup>−1</sup> and 18.86%, respectively).https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/11/1711cumindrip irrigationfertigationnet returnWUEyield
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Moti Lal Mehriya
Neelam Geat
Sarita
Hari Singh
Mohamed A. Mattar
Hosam O. Elansary
spellingShingle Moti Lal Mehriya
Neelam Geat
Sarita
Hari Singh
Mohamed A. Mattar
Hosam O. Elansary
Response of Drip Irrigation and Fertigation on Cumin Yield, Quality, and Water-Use Efficiency Grown under Arid Climatic Conditions
Agronomy
cumin
drip irrigation
fertigation
net return
WUE
yield
author_facet Moti Lal Mehriya
Neelam Geat
Sarita
Hari Singh
Mohamed A. Mattar
Hosam O. Elansary
author_sort Moti Lal Mehriya
title Response of Drip Irrigation and Fertigation on Cumin Yield, Quality, and Water-Use Efficiency Grown under Arid Climatic Conditions
title_short Response of Drip Irrigation and Fertigation on Cumin Yield, Quality, and Water-Use Efficiency Grown under Arid Climatic Conditions
title_full Response of Drip Irrigation and Fertigation on Cumin Yield, Quality, and Water-Use Efficiency Grown under Arid Climatic Conditions
title_fullStr Response of Drip Irrigation and Fertigation on Cumin Yield, Quality, and Water-Use Efficiency Grown under Arid Climatic Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Response of Drip Irrigation and Fertigation on Cumin Yield, Quality, and Water-Use Efficiency Grown under Arid Climatic Conditions
title_sort response of drip irrigation and fertigation on cumin yield, quality, and water-use efficiency grown under arid climatic conditions
publisher MDPI AG
series Agronomy
issn 2073-4395
publishDate 2020-11-01
description A three-year field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station of Mandor, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, under arid climatic conditions in the rabi season of 2016–2019 with the objectives of evaluating the effect of drip irrigation and fertigation levels on cumin plant growth, yield, oil content, water-use efficiency, and water productivity. The pooled data revealed that the drip irrigation at 0.6 cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) recorded significantly higher plant height (31.4 cm), umbels plant<sup>−1</sup> (50.4), umbellates umbel<sup>−1</sup> (5.07), seeds umbel<sup>−1</sup> (5.34), test weight (4.60 g), seed yield (1063 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), gross return (₹ 172,600 ha<sup>−1</sup>), net return (₹ 113,500 ha<sup>−1</sup>) and benefit, and cost ratio (2.9) over drip fertigation at 0.4 CPE and surface irrigation with 0.8 CPE. The fertigation with 80% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) being at par with 100% RDF recorded a significantly higher number of umbels plant<sup>−1</sup> (50.0), umbellates umbel<sup>−1</sup> (5.03), seeds umbellate<sup>−1</sup> (5.24), test weight (4.67 g), seed yield (1052 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), gross return (₹ 170,900 ha<sup>−1</sup>), net return (₹ 111,700 ha<sup>−1</sup>), and benefit cost ratio (2.9) over fertigation with 60% RDF and control. Maximum water-use efficiency (5.7 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> mm<sup>−1</sup>) and water saving (39.04%) was observed under drip irrigation at 0.4 CPE followed by 0.6 CPE (4.8 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> mm<sup>−1</sup> and 18.86%, respectively).
topic cumin
drip irrigation
fertigation
net return
WUE
yield
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/11/1711
work_keys_str_mv AT motilalmehriya responseofdripirrigationandfertigationoncuminyieldqualityandwateruseefficiencygrownunderaridclimaticconditions
AT neelamgeat responseofdripirrigationandfertigationoncuminyieldqualityandwateruseefficiencygrownunderaridclimaticconditions
AT sarita responseofdripirrigationandfertigationoncuminyieldqualityandwateruseefficiencygrownunderaridclimaticconditions
AT harisingh responseofdripirrigationandfertigationoncuminyieldqualityandwateruseefficiencygrownunderaridclimaticconditions
AT mohamedamattar responseofdripirrigationandfertigationoncuminyieldqualityandwateruseefficiencygrownunderaridclimaticconditions
AT hosamoelansary responseofdripirrigationandfertigationoncuminyieldqualityandwateruseefficiencygrownunderaridclimaticconditions
_version_ 1721565670220496896