Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific versus Off-the-Shelf Knee Implants: A Systematic Review

Customised, patient-specific implants (PSI) manufactured based on computed tomography data are intended to improve the clinical outcome by restoring more natural knee kinematics as well as providing a better fit and a more precise positioning. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Céline Saphena Moret, Benjamin Luca Schelker, Michael Tobias Hirschmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/7/590
id doaj-2edf104caa8742c3943e5644be8da1cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2edf104caa8742c3943e5644be8da1cb2021-07-23T13:49:19ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262021-06-011159059010.3390/jpm11070590Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific versus Off-the-Shelf Knee Implants: A Systematic ReviewCéline Saphena Moret0Benjamin Luca Schelker1Michael Tobias Hirschmann2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland (Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen), CH-4101 Bruderholz, SwitzerlandDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland (Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen), CH-4101 Bruderholz, SwitzerlandDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland (Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen), CH-4101 Bruderholz, SwitzerlandCustomised, patient-specific implants (PSI) manufactured based on computed tomography data are intended to improve the clinical outcome by restoring more natural knee kinematics as well as providing a better fit and a more precise positioning. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effect of these PSI on the clinical and radiological outcome compared to standard, off-the-shelf (OTS) implants. Thirteen comparative studies including a total of 2127 knee implants were identified. No significant differences in clinical outcome assessed with the range of motion, the Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) were found between PSI and OTS implants. PSI showed fewer outliers from the neutral limb axis and a better implant fit and positioning. Whether these radiological differences lead to long-term advantages in terms of implant survival cannot be answered based on the current data. Patients receiving PSI could be discharged home earlier at the same or at an even lower total cost. The effective overall superiority of PSI has yet to be proven in long-term studies.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/7/590total knee arthroplastycustomisedpatient specificpersonalisedknee replacement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Céline Saphena Moret
Benjamin Luca Schelker
Michael Tobias Hirschmann
spellingShingle Céline Saphena Moret
Benjamin Luca Schelker
Michael Tobias Hirschmann
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific versus Off-the-Shelf Knee Implants: A Systematic Review
Journal of Personalized Medicine
total knee arthroplasty
customised
patient specific
personalised
knee replacement
author_facet Céline Saphena Moret
Benjamin Luca Schelker
Michael Tobias Hirschmann
author_sort Céline Saphena Moret
title Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific versus Off-the-Shelf Knee Implants: A Systematic Review
title_short Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific versus Off-the-Shelf Knee Implants: A Systematic Review
title_full Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific versus Off-the-Shelf Knee Implants: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific versus Off-the-Shelf Knee Implants: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific versus Off-the-Shelf Knee Implants: A Systematic Review
title_sort clinical and radiological outcomes after knee arthroplasty with patient-specific versus off-the-shelf knee implants: a systematic review
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
issn 2075-4426
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Customised, patient-specific implants (PSI) manufactured based on computed tomography data are intended to improve the clinical outcome by restoring more natural knee kinematics as well as providing a better fit and a more precise positioning. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effect of these PSI on the clinical and radiological outcome compared to standard, off-the-shelf (OTS) implants. Thirteen comparative studies including a total of 2127 knee implants were identified. No significant differences in clinical outcome assessed with the range of motion, the Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) were found between PSI and OTS implants. PSI showed fewer outliers from the neutral limb axis and a better implant fit and positioning. Whether these radiological differences lead to long-term advantages in terms of implant survival cannot be answered based on the current data. Patients receiving PSI could be discharged home earlier at the same or at an even lower total cost. The effective overall superiority of PSI has yet to be proven in long-term studies.
topic total knee arthroplasty
customised
patient specific
personalised
knee replacement
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/7/590
work_keys_str_mv AT celinesaphenamoret clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesafterkneearthroplastywithpatientspecificversusofftheshelfkneeimplantsasystematicreview
AT benjaminlucaschelker clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesafterkneearthroplastywithpatientspecificversusofftheshelfkneeimplantsasystematicreview
AT michaeltobiashirschmann clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesafterkneearthroplastywithpatientspecificversusofftheshelfkneeimplantsasystematicreview
_version_ 1721287545429426176