Legislative framework of in-house procurement

The article “Legislative Framework of In-house Procurement” examines the importance of the concept of the in-house transactions in Public Procurement. The purpose of the work is to analyse the Legislative Framework from the perspective of the principle of free competition. The study of free competit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Krivins Anatolijs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/09/shsconf_shw2019_01026.pdf
id doaj-2f1c228e91bd450aa7187b3529d2a8e8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2f1c228e91bd450aa7187b3529d2a8e82021-02-02T05:40:18ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242019-01-01680102610.1051/shsconf/20196801026shsconf_shw2019_01026Legislative framework of in-house procurementKrivins AnatolijsThe article “Legislative Framework of In-house Procurement” examines the importance of the concept of the in-house transactions in Public Procurement. The purpose of the work is to analyse the Legislative Framework from the perspective of the principle of free competition. The study of free competition is based on works and the main ideas of the following authors: Adam Smith, Jean-Baptiste Say, David Ricardo, Thomas Robert Malthus, John Stuart Mill, John Maynard Keynes, Friedrich August von Hayek and Milton Friedman. Having done the analysis of the EU directives and regulations concerning In-house Procurement (Directive 2014/24/EU; Directive 2014/25/EU; Directive 2013/34/EU; Case C-107/98, Case C-26/03, Case C-84/03, Case C-295/05, Case C-480/06, Case C-324/07, Case C-573/07, Case C-196/08, Case C182/11 and C183/11), as well as normative regulations of several countries, the author made a conclusion, that In-house Procurement contains considerable threats to the principle of free competition in Public Procurement. In-house Procurement contains considerable threats to the principle of free competition in Public Procurement. The data obtained confirm this hypothesis. The results obtained allow us to develop recommendations for the Legislative Framework of In-house Procurement. The results of the research can be used by procurement theoreticians and practitioners.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/09/shsconf_shw2019_01026.pdflegislative frameworkin-house procurementfree competition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Krivins Anatolijs
spellingShingle Krivins Anatolijs
Legislative framework of in-house procurement
SHS Web of Conferences
legislative framework
in-house procurement
free competition
author_facet Krivins Anatolijs
author_sort Krivins Anatolijs
title Legislative framework of in-house procurement
title_short Legislative framework of in-house procurement
title_full Legislative framework of in-house procurement
title_fullStr Legislative framework of in-house procurement
title_full_unstemmed Legislative framework of in-house procurement
title_sort legislative framework of in-house procurement
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The article “Legislative Framework of In-house Procurement” examines the importance of the concept of the in-house transactions in Public Procurement. The purpose of the work is to analyse the Legislative Framework from the perspective of the principle of free competition. The study of free competition is based on works and the main ideas of the following authors: Adam Smith, Jean-Baptiste Say, David Ricardo, Thomas Robert Malthus, John Stuart Mill, John Maynard Keynes, Friedrich August von Hayek and Milton Friedman. Having done the analysis of the EU directives and regulations concerning In-house Procurement (Directive 2014/24/EU; Directive 2014/25/EU; Directive 2013/34/EU; Case C-107/98, Case C-26/03, Case C-84/03, Case C-295/05, Case C-480/06, Case C-324/07, Case C-573/07, Case C-196/08, Case C182/11 and C183/11), as well as normative regulations of several countries, the author made a conclusion, that In-house Procurement contains considerable threats to the principle of free competition in Public Procurement. In-house Procurement contains considerable threats to the principle of free competition in Public Procurement. The data obtained confirm this hypothesis. The results obtained allow us to develop recommendations for the Legislative Framework of In-house Procurement. The results of the research can be used by procurement theoreticians and practitioners.
topic legislative framework
in-house procurement
free competition
url https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/09/shsconf_shw2019_01026.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT krivinsanatolijs legislativeframeworkofinhouseprocurement
_version_ 1724303025626939392