Neighborhood disadvantage and longitudinal brain-predicted-age trajectory during adolescence

Neighborhood disadvantage has consistently been linked to alterations in brain structure; however, positive environmental (e.g., positive parenting) and psychological factors (e.g., temperament) may buffer these effects. We aimed to investigate associations between neighborhood disadvantage and devi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Divyangana Rakesh, Vanessa Cropley, Andrew Zalesky, Nandita Vijayakumar, Nicholas B. Allen, Sarah Whittle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-10-01
Series:Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Subjects:
MRI
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187892932100092X
id doaj-2f50b03ea32d4195a57fd931b214d67c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2f50b03ea32d4195a57fd931b214d67c2021-08-18T04:21:43ZengElsevierDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience1878-92932021-10-0151101002Neighborhood disadvantage and longitudinal brain-predicted-age trajectory during adolescenceDivyangana Rakesh0Vanessa Cropley1Andrew Zalesky2Nandita Vijayakumar3Nicholas B. Allen4Sarah Whittle5Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Corresponding authors at: Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Alan Gilbert Building (level 3), 161 Barry Street, 3053 VIC, Melbourne, Australia.Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, AustraliaMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AustraliaSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, AustraliaDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, USAMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Corresponding authors at: Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Alan Gilbert Building (level 3), 161 Barry Street, 3053 VIC, Melbourne, Australia.Neighborhood disadvantage has consistently been linked to alterations in brain structure; however, positive environmental (e.g., positive parenting) and psychological factors (e.g., temperament) may buffer these effects. We aimed to investigate associations between neighborhood disadvantage and deviations from typical neurodevelopmental trajectories during adolescence, and examine the moderating role of positive parenting and temperamental effortful control (EC). Using a large dataset (n = 1313), a normative model of brain morphology was established, which was then used to predict the age of youth from a longitudinal dataset (n = 166, three time-points at age 12, 16, and 19). Using linear mixed models, we investigated whether trajectories of the difference between brain-predicted-age and chronological age (brainAGE) were associated with neighborhood disadvantage, and whether positive parenting (positive behavior during a problem-solving task) and EC moderated these associations. We found that neighborhood disadvantage was associated with positive brainAGE during early adolescence and a deceleration (decreasing brainAGE) thereafter. EC moderated this association such that in disadvantaged adolescents, low EC was associated with delayed development (negative brainAGE) during late adolescence. Findings provide evidence for complex associations between environmental and psychological factors, and brain maturation. They suggest that neighborhood disadvantage may have long-term effects on neurodevelopment during adolescence, but high EC could buffer these effects.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187892932100092Xadolescencesocioeconomic statustemperamental effortful controlparentinglongitudinalMRI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Divyangana Rakesh
Vanessa Cropley
Andrew Zalesky
Nandita Vijayakumar
Nicholas B. Allen
Sarah Whittle
spellingShingle Divyangana Rakesh
Vanessa Cropley
Andrew Zalesky
Nandita Vijayakumar
Nicholas B. Allen
Sarah Whittle
Neighborhood disadvantage and longitudinal brain-predicted-age trajectory during adolescence
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
adolescence
socioeconomic status
temperamental effortful control
parenting
longitudinal
MRI
author_facet Divyangana Rakesh
Vanessa Cropley
Andrew Zalesky
Nandita Vijayakumar
Nicholas B. Allen
Sarah Whittle
author_sort Divyangana Rakesh
title Neighborhood disadvantage and longitudinal brain-predicted-age trajectory during adolescence
title_short Neighborhood disadvantage and longitudinal brain-predicted-age trajectory during adolescence
title_full Neighborhood disadvantage and longitudinal brain-predicted-age trajectory during adolescence
title_fullStr Neighborhood disadvantage and longitudinal brain-predicted-age trajectory during adolescence
title_full_unstemmed Neighborhood disadvantage and longitudinal brain-predicted-age trajectory during adolescence
title_sort neighborhood disadvantage and longitudinal brain-predicted-age trajectory during adolescence
publisher Elsevier
series Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
issn 1878-9293
publishDate 2021-10-01
description Neighborhood disadvantage has consistently been linked to alterations in brain structure; however, positive environmental (e.g., positive parenting) and psychological factors (e.g., temperament) may buffer these effects. We aimed to investigate associations between neighborhood disadvantage and deviations from typical neurodevelopmental trajectories during adolescence, and examine the moderating role of positive parenting and temperamental effortful control (EC). Using a large dataset (n = 1313), a normative model of brain morphology was established, which was then used to predict the age of youth from a longitudinal dataset (n = 166, three time-points at age 12, 16, and 19). Using linear mixed models, we investigated whether trajectories of the difference between brain-predicted-age and chronological age (brainAGE) were associated with neighborhood disadvantage, and whether positive parenting (positive behavior during a problem-solving task) and EC moderated these associations. We found that neighborhood disadvantage was associated with positive brainAGE during early adolescence and a deceleration (decreasing brainAGE) thereafter. EC moderated this association such that in disadvantaged adolescents, low EC was associated with delayed development (negative brainAGE) during late adolescence. Findings provide evidence for complex associations between environmental and psychological factors, and brain maturation. They suggest that neighborhood disadvantage may have long-term effects on neurodevelopment during adolescence, but high EC could buffer these effects.
topic adolescence
socioeconomic status
temperamental effortful control
parenting
longitudinal
MRI
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187892932100092X
work_keys_str_mv AT divyanganarakesh neighborhooddisadvantageandlongitudinalbrainpredictedagetrajectoryduringadolescence
AT vanessacropley neighborhooddisadvantageandlongitudinalbrainpredictedagetrajectoryduringadolescence
AT andrewzalesky neighborhooddisadvantageandlongitudinalbrainpredictedagetrajectoryduringadolescence
AT nanditavijayakumar neighborhooddisadvantageandlongitudinalbrainpredictedagetrajectoryduringadolescence
AT nicholasballen neighborhooddisadvantageandlongitudinalbrainpredictedagetrajectoryduringadolescence
AT sarahwhittle neighborhooddisadvantageandlongitudinalbrainpredictedagetrajectoryduringadolescence
_version_ 1721203629407338496