The glial response to intracerebrally delivered therapies for neurodegenerative disorders: Is this a critical issue?

The role of glial cells in the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative conditions of the central nervous system (CNS) is now well established (as is discussed in other reviews in this special issue of Frontiers in Neuropharmacology). What is less clear is whether there are changes in these same cells...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesca eCicchetti, Roger A Barker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphar.2014.00139/full
id doaj-2f684a393bb44cb0b65c7f35410a5493
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2f684a393bb44cb0b65c7f35410a54932020-11-24T21:47:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122014-07-01510.3389/fphar.2014.0013992338The glial response to intracerebrally delivered therapies for neurodegenerative disorders: Is this a critical issue?Francesca eCicchetti0Roger A Barker1Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec (CHUL)/Université LavalCambridge Center for Brain RepairThe role of glial cells in the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative conditions of the central nervous system (CNS) is now well established (as is discussed in other reviews in this special issue of Frontiers in Neuropharmacology). What is less clear is whether there are changes in these same cells in terms of their behaviour and function in response to invasive experimental therapeutic interventions for these diseases. This has, and will continue to, become more of an issue as we enter a new era of novel treatments which require the agent to be directly placed/infused into the CNS such as deep brain stimulation, cell transplants, gene therapies and growth factor infusions. To date, all of these treatments have produced variable outcomes and the reasons for this have been widely debated but the host astrocytic and/or microglial response induced by such invasively delivered agents has not been discussed in any detail. In this review, we have attempted to summarise the limited published data on this, in particular we discuss the small number of human post-mortem studies reported in this field. By so doing, we hope to provide a better description and understanding of the extent and nature of both the astrocytic and microglial response, which in turn could lead to modifications in the way these therapeutic interventions are delivered.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphar.2014.00139/fullAstrocytesCell TransplantationDeep Brain StimulationMicrogliaAlzheimer's diseaseParkinson's disease
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francesca eCicchetti
Roger A Barker
spellingShingle Francesca eCicchetti
Roger A Barker
The glial response to intracerebrally delivered therapies for neurodegenerative disorders: Is this a critical issue?
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Astrocytes
Cell Transplantation
Deep Brain Stimulation
Microglia
Alzheimer's disease
Parkinson's disease
author_facet Francesca eCicchetti
Roger A Barker
author_sort Francesca eCicchetti
title The glial response to intracerebrally delivered therapies for neurodegenerative disorders: Is this a critical issue?
title_short The glial response to intracerebrally delivered therapies for neurodegenerative disorders: Is this a critical issue?
title_full The glial response to intracerebrally delivered therapies for neurodegenerative disorders: Is this a critical issue?
title_fullStr The glial response to intracerebrally delivered therapies for neurodegenerative disorders: Is this a critical issue?
title_full_unstemmed The glial response to intracerebrally delivered therapies for neurodegenerative disorders: Is this a critical issue?
title_sort glial response to intracerebrally delivered therapies for neurodegenerative disorders: is this a critical issue?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
issn 1663-9812
publishDate 2014-07-01
description The role of glial cells in the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative conditions of the central nervous system (CNS) is now well established (as is discussed in other reviews in this special issue of Frontiers in Neuropharmacology). What is less clear is whether there are changes in these same cells in terms of their behaviour and function in response to invasive experimental therapeutic interventions for these diseases. This has, and will continue to, become more of an issue as we enter a new era of novel treatments which require the agent to be directly placed/infused into the CNS such as deep brain stimulation, cell transplants, gene therapies and growth factor infusions. To date, all of these treatments have produced variable outcomes and the reasons for this have been widely debated but the host astrocytic and/or microglial response induced by such invasively delivered agents has not been discussed in any detail. In this review, we have attempted to summarise the limited published data on this, in particular we discuss the small number of human post-mortem studies reported in this field. By so doing, we hope to provide a better description and understanding of the extent and nature of both the astrocytic and microglial response, which in turn could lead to modifications in the way these therapeutic interventions are delivered.
topic Astrocytes
Cell Transplantation
Deep Brain Stimulation
Microglia
Alzheimer's disease
Parkinson's disease
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphar.2014.00139/full
work_keys_str_mv AT francescaecicchetti theglialresponsetointracerebrallydeliveredtherapiesforneurodegenerativedisordersisthisacriticalissue
AT rogerabarker theglialresponsetointracerebrallydeliveredtherapiesforneurodegenerativedisordersisthisacriticalissue
AT francescaecicchetti glialresponsetointracerebrallydeliveredtherapiesforneurodegenerativedisordersisthisacriticalissue
AT rogerabarker glialresponsetointracerebrallydeliveredtherapiesforneurodegenerativedisordersisthisacriticalissue
_version_ 1725895154136514560