Verantwortung angesichts humanbiologischer Herausforderungen

With the advancement of the new biotechnologies the problem of responsibility is becoming particularly acute. Instead of giving an own definition of responsibility, the author proposes to take it as a heuristic concept based on some Husserlian ideas developed in the Krisis. This ideas, which have so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Antje Kapust
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Axia Academic Publishers 2016-09-01
Series:Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.axiapublishers.com/ojs/index.php/labyrinth/article/view/38
id doaj-2facb3d2b9d749f6939976fad5bdcae9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2facb3d2b9d749f6939976fad5bdcae92021-03-02T08:47:56ZdeuAxia Academic PublishersLabyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics2410-48171561-89272016-09-0118111412910.25180/lj.v18i1.3835Verantwortung angesichts humanbiologischer HerausforderungenAntje Kapust0Ruhr-Universität BochumWith the advancement of the new biotechnologies the problem of responsibility is becoming particularly acute. Instead of giving an own definition of responsibility, the author proposes to take it as a heuristic concept based on some Husserlian ideas developed in the Krisis. This ideas, which have some similarity with Jonas' principle of responsibility, are: first, responsibility as care for the vulnerable, second, responsibility in the context of a horizon of possibilities, and, third, responsibility for the own prerequisites as human being. By applying the hermeneutics of suspicion to some current issues, the author argues that the biotechnological revolution comes along with a shift of the cultures of recognition onto cultures of consumption. On the base of different arguments used in the biotechnological debates (arguments of status, of action relevance, of moral and right), three types of responsibility are revealed: the aporetic, the consecutive, and the quasi-hermeneutical responsibility, which enables a final controversy about their deficiency.http://www.axiapublishers.com/ojs/index.php/labyrinth/article/view/38Edmund Husserl, phenomenology, hermeneutics, biotechnology, bioethics, genome, responsibility
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antje Kapust
spellingShingle Antje Kapust
Verantwortung angesichts humanbiologischer Herausforderungen
Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics
Edmund Husserl, phenomenology, hermeneutics, biotechnology, bioethics, genome, responsibility
author_facet Antje Kapust
author_sort Antje Kapust
title Verantwortung angesichts humanbiologischer Herausforderungen
title_short Verantwortung angesichts humanbiologischer Herausforderungen
title_full Verantwortung angesichts humanbiologischer Herausforderungen
title_fullStr Verantwortung angesichts humanbiologischer Herausforderungen
title_full_unstemmed Verantwortung angesichts humanbiologischer Herausforderungen
title_sort verantwortung angesichts humanbiologischer herausforderungen
publisher Axia Academic Publishers
series Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics
issn 2410-4817
1561-8927
publishDate 2016-09-01
description With the advancement of the new biotechnologies the problem of responsibility is becoming particularly acute. Instead of giving an own definition of responsibility, the author proposes to take it as a heuristic concept based on some Husserlian ideas developed in the Krisis. This ideas, which have some similarity with Jonas' principle of responsibility, are: first, responsibility as care for the vulnerable, second, responsibility in the context of a horizon of possibilities, and, third, responsibility for the own prerequisites as human being. By applying the hermeneutics of suspicion to some current issues, the author argues that the biotechnological revolution comes along with a shift of the cultures of recognition onto cultures of consumption. On the base of different arguments used in the biotechnological debates (arguments of status, of action relevance, of moral and right), three types of responsibility are revealed: the aporetic, the consecutive, and the quasi-hermeneutical responsibility, which enables a final controversy about their deficiency.
topic Edmund Husserl, phenomenology, hermeneutics, biotechnology, bioethics, genome, responsibility
url http://www.axiapublishers.com/ojs/index.php/labyrinth/article/view/38
work_keys_str_mv AT antjekapust verantwortungangesichtshumanbiologischerherausforderungen
_version_ 1724240378632077312